Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

Jeep Grand Cherokee 4.7 HO vs BMW X5 4.4i from a roll

My Grand Cherokee racing a friend's BMW from a rolling start.


 


More Videos...


Jeep Grand Cherokee WJ & Toyota Surf at Woodhill
Build thread: http://www.offroadexpress.co.nz/Forums/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=32504 Taken the Jeep out at the first time. 2" BB for the 31"s. Have owned a similar Surf for years (see previous videos :) it was interesting to see the difference. As stated, there is no good or bad, they are two very different trucks! Sound quality isn't the best.





Jeep Grand Cherokee 4.7 WG vs Audi Q7 3.0TDI
0-130





Grand Cherokee 4.7L 01 VS Grand Cherokee 5.7L 06
5.7 hemi with K&N and hypertech chip vs 4.7 with K&N and superchips, 3.73 gear.... 5.7 and 4.7 straight Exhaust





98 Jeep Grand Cherokee 5.2 vs BMW X5 4.4i
98 Grand Cherokee modded 5.2 vs BMW X5 4.4i v8 from 0-110mph and 60-108mph.





Jeep in mud - Grand Cherokee and Cherokee XJ - HD
Brilliant trip with our fellows from Polish Jeep Forum - more details later.





Jeep grand cherokee 4.7 V8 sprint Tunning party 6





JEEP ROLLOVER Compilation 2014
Like/Share/Subscribe I do not own any of these videos and respect everybody in them. Check out the Original owners Channels





5.9 vs 4.7 Jeep Grand Cherokee shoot out Hemi Killers GoPro
We test the ZJ 5.9 limited vs the WJ 4.7 overland in the sand dunes, drag race and hill climb.





4.7L HO Overland 3" Side Exhaust
3" Thunderbolt Catalytic Converter, 3" Borla XR-1, 3" to 2.5" Y pipe, 3" Cherry Bomb dual wall tips Exhaust Pros-Brainerd, MN





BMW Z8 vs Grand Cherokee SRT8 stroke
400 BMW Z8 vs Grand Cherokee SRT8 stroke dereiter racing





2000 HORSEPOWER FARM JEEP
Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/MadRam11 Instagram at http://instagram.com/madram11 Check Out BlueFire Outdoors for all your off road Lighting. http://bluefire-lights.com SUPER ATV http://www.superatv.com The Farm Jeep driven by Kenny Miller is one badass machine. This jeep makes around 2000 horsepower and has 5 ton axles, and some monster size tires on it. It has the be one of the baddest jeeps around.





BMW M5 vs BMW M6 & Jeep SRT-8 vs BMW X6M.AVI





2015 BMW X5 vs. 2015 Range Rover Sport
Head-to-head: 2014 Range Rover Sport vs. 2014 BMW X5 Today’s luxury SUVs are essentially luxury sedans on stilts, withal all the prestige and performance you could want. But not all of these Lux-u-vees are created equal, so we compare two of the very best, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport and the BMW X5. Both are all-new and massively improved for 2014. But which one wins? LED lighting in the front and rear, a chunky fender vent, and a chiseled shape make the 2014 Range Rover Sport a delight to look at. When it comes to testing two premium luxury SUVs that can push their price-tags into six figures, one thing is certain: neither is going to stink up the place. That’s why comparing the all-new 2014 BMW X5 and just-as-new Land Rover Range Rover Sport is like deciding between crème brûlée and crème caramel…they’re both delicious (and highly caloric). But alas, they have very different characters. Style Statements If you can only drive one at a time, and if it was my money, I’d go with the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Why? The 2014 BMW X5’s new exterior is dowdier than before, with slab sides and a blunter nose. We wouldn’t say the X5 is unattractive, but its design relies on things like nifty LED lights and various decorative ornaments on the fasciae and body-sides to dress up the styling. Like flat-front khakis and a pastel polo shirt; the X5 is country-club correct, if not terribly interesting. The Range Rover Sport has plenty of decoration on the exterior too. This includes sleek LED lighting at the front and rear, as well as a chunky fender vent. The chiseled shape is simply more distinctive than the BMW. Range Rover also offers countless customization opportunities, including an available contrast-color roof treatment. The clear fashion-statement winner here is definitely the Rover. The 2014 BMW X5 may not be the hottest looking thing, but it does the trick. Cabin Comfort Both of these vehicles have opulent cabins, with even more premium materials and features on the options lists. But the Bimmer bests the Range Rover Sport in two key areas: space (there’s more of it, with room for up to seven passengers) and the control interface. BMW has worked for years to perfect its hockey-puck-and-screen iDrive infotainment system, and now it works brilliantly. The Range Rover Sport can only seat five, and for infotainment, it uses a touch screen interface that can’t multitask terribly well and is annoyingly slow to respond to inputs. That said, the seats are wonderful (as they are in the Bimmer, to be fair), and Rover’s boxy interior design is quite regal and British in character. The 2014 BMW X5 may not be the hottest looking thing, but it does the trick. Cabin Comfort Both of these vehicles have opulent cabins, with even more premium materials and features on the options lists. But the Bimmer bests the Range Rover Sport in two key areas: space (there’s more of it, with room for up to seven passengers) and the control interface. BMW has worked for years to perfect its hockey-puck-and-screen iDrive infotainment system, and now it works brilliantly. The Range Rover Sport can only seat five, and for infotainment, it uses a touch screen interface that can’t multitask terribly well and is annoyingly slow to respond to inputs. That said, the seats are wonderful (as they are in the Bimmer, to be fair), and Rover’s boxy interior design is quite regal and British in character. By contrast, the X5’s cabin is modern and sleek – but its business-like sterility can also work against it. In terms of luxury and style, this contest is a draw. Deciding between these luxury sport utilities comes down to an emotional connection to the vehicle. After all, that’s something a person ought to have when plunking down $60K—$100K for a vehicle. Did we find ourselves more excited about hopping into the cool and functional X5, or the character-rich Range Rover Sport? In terms of overall character, the Range Rover Sport is the winner. 2015 Lexus NX vs. 2015 Audi Q5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoIx3NqZ1zk 2014 Audi Q5 vs. 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK 250 BlueTEC http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c98GbcfHa1E 2015 Range Rover Sport vs. 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee 2015 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2014 AUDİ Q5 vs. 2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvFuYpAWP2I 2014 Infiniti QX70 2014 Porsche Cayenne





Jeep Grand Cherokee 4.7 HO vs BMW X5 4.4i
4.7L HO vs 4.4i from a dig





Jeep Grand Cherokee 2011 - First drive
Der neue Jeep Grand Cherokee - auch im derben Gelände macht das elegante SUV eine hervorragende Figur. Die Vorstellung finden Sie unter: http://www.autochronisten.de





Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?




Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1986 Jeep Cherokee Laredo: 8.961 @ 152.970
Martin Blair, Engine: 440- .030 = 499 ci, Tires: 15x18.5 Hoiser quick time pros


1985 Jeep Cherokee : 12.509 @ 105.890
Linh Do, Engine: 350, Tires: 28 X 12.5 M/T


2010 BMW X5 : 12.880 @ 107.160
toMMy, Engine: 4.4l, Turbos: TwinTurbo


1995 Jeep Cherokee XJ-R: 12.989 @ 100.020
Greg Stewart, Engine: 4.0L w/ 243k miles, Turbos: 50 trim T3/T4


1998 Jeep Cherokee : 13.230 @ 100.000
Starlin Evans jr (Lee), Engine: 4.0,


2013 BMW X5 50i Dinan Stage 2: 13.490 @ 104.100
Gary Champagne, Engine: twin turbo v8 dinan stage 2,


2011 BMW X5 xDrive5 4.4 V8 Twin Turbo: 13.643 @ 101.910
macspeed, Engine: 4.4L V8 TwinPower Turbo,


2005 BMW X5 4.8is: 14.510 @ 96.210
NA,


2007 BMW X5 V8 4.8i: 14.580 @ 95.100
Joe Grand, Engine: 4.8 l 350 hp, Tires: dunlop


1989 Jeep Cherokee xj limited: 14.589 @ 94.200
glenn wall, Engine: 4.0l inline 6 bored to 4.5, Supercharger: no Turbos: no Tires: nitto drag radials


1992 Jeep Cherokee Laredo: 14.630 @ 94.400
Dino Savva, Engine: 4.6L Stroker, 0 0 Tires: 225/70R15H


1994 Jeep Cherokee 4.0 straight 6: 14.731 @ 91.190
russ s, Engine: i-6, Supercharger: no Turbos: no Tires: skinnys up frt m/t ET streets


2003 BMW X5 4.6is: 14.800 @ 93.600
NA, Engine: V8 DOHC 4-valve/cyl.; VANOS,


2004 BMW X5 4.4i: 14.900 @ 94.500
NA,


1992 Jeep Cherokee sport: 14.924 @ 93.000
Joey Houser, Engine: 4.0L IL 6, Tires: Arizonian


1989 Jeep Cherokee limited 4x4: 14.930 @ 95.600
glenn wall, Engine: straight 6 bored to 4.5L,


1998 Jeep Cherokee sport : 15.020 @ 91.000
Gabriel Rivera, Engine: 4.0L inline 6,


2003 BMW X5 4.4i: 15.200 @ 91.200
NA, Engine: V8 DOHC 4-valve/cyl.; VANOS,


1994 Jeep Cherokee Country: 15.210 @ 89.600
Brent,


1994 Jeep Cherokee SE: 15.300 @ 87.249
Lee Green, Engine: 4.0L HO I6, Tires: all terrain radials


 


©2015 DragTimes - Disclaimer - Contact Us