Crash Test of 2004 - 2008 Nissan Maxima (Frontal Offset) IIHS
FRONTAL OFFSET TEST
OVERALL EVALUATION: Structure/safety cage Injury measures Restraints/dummy
Head/neck Chest Leg/foot, left Leg/foot, right
Important: Frontal crash test ratings can be compared only among vehicles
of similar weight.
Good Acceptable Marginal Poor
The Nissan Maxima was redesigned for the 2004 model year.
Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement was well controlled. During
rebound, the dummy's head hit the inflated side curtain airbag. The dummy
continued to rebound into the seat without its head coming close to any
stiff structure that could cause injury.
Injury measures — Measures taken from the head, neck, chest, and both
legs indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this
2009 Chevy Malibu vs 1959 Bel Air Crash Test
This crash test between a modern sedan and the classic 1959 Chevrolet Bel
Air shows just how far passenger protection has come in the last fifty
years. The Institute for Highway Safety staged the test to commemorate its
50th anniversary. Find more crash tests on our web site:
TOP 10 WORST CRASH TESTS
Thanks For Watching! Make Sure You Leave A Like!
And Make Sure You Subscribe To Me And Others!
Mr Geoclay :
Hi!, It's Regan :
exL Aquas :
Make Sure You Like My friends Facebook Page:
DEADLY Crashes: 2013 IIHS Crash Tests
DEADLY Crashes: 2013 IIHS Crash Tests
DEADLY Сбои: 2013 IIHS краш-тестов
ÖLÜMCÜL Çöküyor: 2013 IIHS Crash Testleri
DEADLY Crashes: 2013 IIHS Crash Tests IIHS news release
New crash tests: Underride guards on most big rigs leave passenger vehicle
occupants at risk in certain crashes
Modern semitrailers for the most part do a good job of keeping passenger
vehicles from sliding underneath them, greatly increasing the chances of
surviving a crash into the back of a large truck, recent tests by the
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) show. But in crashes
involving only a small portion of the truck's rear, most trailers fail to
prevent potentially deadly underride.
Full text of release at:
►THANKS for taking the time to visit, I hope you SUBSCRIBE and enjoy the
I'm an italian petrolhead and cars & motorbikes are my passion which I want
to share with all the petrolheads around the world by taking these videos.
►If You like, PLEASE SUBSCRIBE NOW for More videos: http://bit.ly/12ULPud
►Gommeblog.it, Portale dedicato alla Tecnica e Performance di Auto e
Moto. Al Suo interno potrai trovare sezioni dedicate a Supercar, Video Test
di tutte le più importanti case e bran come Alfa Romeo. Audi, Abarth, BMW,
Mercedes, Ferrari, Lamborghini, MTM, AMG, Porsche, Aston Martin,
Koenigsegg, Gumpert (solo per citarne alcune) e interssanti video
recensioni su gomme Michelin, Pirelli, Dunlop, Goodyear, Continental ...
►Non perderti le Ultime NEWS Video: ISCRIVITI ADESSO AL CANALE:
►If you like this video Please rate and comment!
►Se questo video ti è piaciuto, Clicca mi Piace o Lascia un commento
►Follow Us on Social Network:
►Google +: https://plus.google.com/101792401712738693835/
Bumper Crash Test: 2007 Ford Fusion
Go to MYRIDE.COM for more car videos.
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Bumper Performance in Low-Speed
Crash Tests: 2007 Ford Fusion.
Bumper tests of midsize sedans
IIHS news release • August 6, 2009
Bumpers on 4 of 6 midsize sedans improve; none earns good rating in
ARLINGTON, VA — Bumpers on 2009 models of the Honda Accord, Hyundai
Sonata, Mazda 6, and Nissan Maxima performed better than their 2007
predecessors in low-speed crash tests conducted by the Insurance Institute
for Highway Safety. Bumpers on the 2009 Chevrolet Malibu and 2010 Ford
Fusion did worse than earlier models. None of the 6 popular midsize sedans
earns the top rating of good in a recent series of tests designed to assess
and compare how well bumpers resist damage in everyday fender-benders. The
Mazda 6 improves to acceptable from marginal, with an average repair cost
of less than $900 after 4 tests at 3 and 6 mph. The Accord and Sonata
improve to marginal from poor. The Fusion slips to poor from marginal, and
the Maxima and Malibu remain poor.
Full text of release at: http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr080609.html