Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

B-2 Spirit Stealth Bomber

B-2 Spirit Bomber In Action!!!


 


More Videos...


B-1 B-2 & B-52 Doing Heavy Carpet Bombing
The B-52 Stratofortress ,B-1 Lancer & B-2 Spirit Dropping tons & tons of bombs & Carpet Bombing destroying everything in their path.





Top 6 Bombers In The World
Top 6 Bombers In The World plz sub rate and comment 1.Tu-160 2.B2 3.B1 4.B52 5.Tu-95 6.Tu-22m





Top 10 Air Forces Of The World
Top 10 Air Forces Of The World are based on the countries plane quality and pilot Knowledge. China and India are not included because of thier old, out of service, depended to other nation's and lack of pilot training. No mather how good the plane is the pilot has an important rule in combat. Music by Enya (wild child)





USS Nimitz Catapult Takeoff Grumman C-2A
Video taken from the bridge of the USS Nimitz showing Grumman C-2A wings unfolding and catapult takeoff.





USS Independence (Littoral Combat Ship) LCS-2
One of the US Navy's new Littoral Combat Ships, the USS Independence LCS-2. Stealthy, trimaran, x-boat....nice! It has a twin too. If you don't like the music, scroll down through the comments for an explanation.





Refueling a B-2 over Scotland
The return leg of an OIF combat sortie getting gas as they pass over northern Scotland.





Trck trial Drnovice 09 -7
Ural 6x6 -tentokrát úspěšný





A-10 Warthog (Thunderbolt II) bombing run
***I disabled comments because I'm sick of people telling everyone that the explosions are rigged. We all know that they are rigged. I never implied that they weren't rigged. The commentator at the airshow, and on the movie's audio, says that the explosions are rigged. Comments in the video itself say that they are rigged. TL;DR I got tired of rampant stupidity and disabled comments.*** Low Quality Video. This is video from the 2006 Cleveland National Airshow hosted at Burke-Lakefront Airport in Cleveland Ohio.The explosions are rigged, but it's cool none-the-less.





RARE VIDEO Russian Air Force Su-24 on bombing mission.
Russian air force bomber aircraft The Sukhoi Su-24 (NATO reporting name: Fencer) is a supersonic, all-weather attack aircraft developed in the Soviet Union. This variable-sweep wing, twin-engined side-by-side two-seater carried the USSR's first integrated digital navigation/attack system.[1] It remains in service with former Soviet air forces and various air forces to which it was exported. Design The Su-24 has a shoulder-mounted variable geometry wing outboard of a relatively small fixed wing glove, swept at 69°. The wing has four sweep settings: 16° for take-off and landing, 35° and 45° for cruise at different altitudes, and 69° for minimum aspect ratio and wing area in low-level dashes. The variable geometry wing provides excellent STOL performance, allowing a landing speed of 230 km/h (143 mph), even lower than the Sukhoi Su-17 despite substantially greater take-off weight. Its high wing loading provides a stable low-level ride and minimal gust response. The Su-24 has two Saturn/Lyulka AL-21F-3A afterburning turbojet engines with 109.8 kN (24,700 lbf) thrust each, fed with air from two rectangular side mounted intakes with splitter plates/boundary-layer diverters. In early Su-24 ("Fencer A" according to NATO) aircraft these intakes had variable ramps, allowing a maximum speed of 2,320 km/h (1,440 mph), Mach 2.18, at altitude and a ceiling of some 17,500 m (57,400 ft). Because the Su-24 is used almost exclusively for low-level missions, the actuators for the variable intakes were deleted to reduce weight and maintenance. This has no effect on low-level performance, but absolute maximum speed and altitude are cut to Mach 1.35 and 11,000 m (36,100 ft).[5] The earliest Su-24 had a box-like rear fuselage, which was shortly changed in production to a rear Exhaust shroud more closely shaped around the engines in order to reduce drag. The revised aircraft also gained three side-by-side antenna fairings in the nose, a repositioned braking chute, and a new ram-air inlet at the base of the tail fin. The revised aircraft were dubbed "Fencer-B" by NATO, but did not merit a new Soviet designation. The Su-24's fixed armament is a single fast-firing GSh-6-23 cannon with 500 rounds of ammunition, mounted in the fuselage underside. The gun is covered with an eyelid shutter when not in use. The warload includes various nuclear weapons. Two or four R-60 (NATO AA-8 'Aphid') infrared missiles are usually carried for self-defense by the Su-24M/24MK.[6] Initial Su-24s had basic electronic countermeasures (ECM) equipment, with many Su-24s limited to the old Sirena radar-warning receiver with no integral jamming system. Later-production Su-24s had more comprehensive radar warning, missile-launch warning, and active ECM equipment, with triangular antennas on the sides of the intakes and the tip of the vertical fin. This earned the NATO designation "Fencer-C", although again it did not have a separate Soviet designation. Some "Fencer-C" and later Su-24M ("Fencer-D" by NATO) have large wing fence/pylons on the wing glove portion with integral chaff/flare dispensers; others have such launchers scabbed onto either side of the tail fin. Syrian civil war[edit] During the escalation of the Syrian Civil War, starting in November 2012, around four months after the first air raids from different fixed wing aircraft started, and after 18 months since the beginning, the first Su-24 medium bombers were filmed dropping their heavy payload on the rebels.[21] The first and to date only Su-24 loss, an upgraded MK2 version, was downed by an Igla sufrace-to-air missile fired by the insurgency already on 28 November near the town Darat Izza in the Aleppo Governorate. One of the pilots, Col. Ziad Daud Ali, was injured and was filmed being taken to a rebel field hospital.[22][23][24] Furthermore, Syrian Fencers have reportedly been involved in near-encounters with NATO warplanes. The first of such incidents occurred in early September 2013, when Syrian Fencers of the 819th Squadron (launched from Tiyas airbase) flew low over the Mediterranean and approached the 14-mile air exclusion zone surrounding the British airbase in Akrotiri, Cyprus. The jets turned back before reaching the area due to two RAF Eurofighter Typhoons being scrambled to intercept them. Turkey also sent two F-16s. The Fencers were possibly testing the air defenses of the base (and their reaction time) in preparation for a possible military strike by the U.S, the United Kingdom and France in the aftermath of the chemical weapons attack in Ghouta, Damascus allegedly committed by the Syrian government.[25][26] Upgrades Surviving Su-24M models have gone through a life-extension and updating program, with GLONASS, upgraded cockpit with multi-function displays (MFDs), HUD, digital moving-map generator, Shchel helmet-mounted sights, and provision for the latest guided weapons, including R-73 (AA-11 'Archer') air-to-air missiles.





F22 Raptor Take-off at RIAT 2010
Buy tickets at www.airtattoo.com. This is the F22s first take-off from RIAT 2010!





MONSTER TRUCK US military Ultra Heavy Lift Amphibious Connector
New concept for the US Marine Corps A potential replacement for the Marines' 20-year-old air cushioned ship-to-shore craft has foam runners and a massive payload. Officials with the Marine Corps Warfighting Lab, in conjunction with the Office of Naval Research, conducted a technical assessment earlier this month with a half-scale version of the Ultra Heavy-Lift Amphibious Connector, a high-tech craft being developed as an option to replace the Landing Craft Air Cushioned as a vehicle to bring troops, vehicles and gear ashore. The UHAC has also been discussed as a replacement for the Landing Craft Utility, another Navy ship-to-shore connector, but Warfighting Lab officials said they were especially interested in how the UHAC stacked up against the LCAC. The Navy's LCACs traditionally deploy with and operate from amphibious well deck ships and often transport Marines to and from shore as part of training or Marine Expeditionary Unit deployments. Unlike the LCAC, which acts as a hovercraft with an inflatable skirt, the UHAC has air-filled tracks made out of foam that can propel it through the water and on land. The footprint of the UHAC is significantly larger: 2,500 square feet of deck area to the LCAC's 1,800. But this means the UHAC can handle a much larger payload. While the LCAC can carry 65 tons of gear, the UHAC can handle 150 tons, or 190 with an overload payload. Capt. James Pineiro, Ground Combat Element branch head for the Warfighting Lab's Science and Technology Division, said the UHAC would be able to carry three main battle tanks ashore, at some 60 tons apiece. Another advantage to the UHAC, Pineiro said, is its range: 200 nautical miles to the LCAC's 86. And unlike the LCAC, when the UHAC arrives onshore, it can keep on going, thanks to low pressure captive air cells in the tracks. At about a pound per square inch, the UHAC can cross mud flats and tidal marsh areas. And the tracks can crawl over a sea wall of up to 10 feet, he said — all important features during a beach assault. "You could look at the amphibious invasion of Inchon, during the Korean War," Pineiro said. "there were significant mud flats there, and a 26-foot tide difference. At low tide it went a couple of miles out. That was a problem during the invasion of Inchon." Where the UHAC does come up short is in water speed. Because of the drag created by the foam tracks, it can only travel at 20 knots, half the speed of the LCAC. But Pineiro said he anticipated that mission commanders would be able to work around this drawback. "When you get into planning ops, you kind of plan for your capability," he said. Officials with the project said the concept for the UHAC originated in 2008, with a goal to design an amphibious vehicle with low PSI. The Office of Naval Research accepted a concept design for the vehicle from the company Navatek, Inc., and the project has been in development since then, with the construction of a half-scale demonstrator and an at-sea demonstration in 2012. The half-scale model is still massive at 42 feet long, 26 feet wide and 17 feet high. It was in Honolulu in early March to complete a limited technical assessment to demonstrate its capabilities. The test, Pineiro said, involved launching the UHAC from a simulated ship's well deck with an internally transported vehicle aboard. The UHAC brought the vehicle to the shore and then returned to the ship, he said. The assessment is preparation for a larger demonstration of the UHAC's abilities at the Advanced Warfighting Experiment, also in Hawaii, that will take place in conjunction with the international exercise Rim of the Pacific 2014 this summer. "We want to make sure the UHAC can perform," Pineiro said. Future steps following this summer's experiment remain unclear as testing continues. But according to the Marines Seabasing Required Capabilities Annual Report for 2013, published in December, product managers with ONR are working with Defense Department agencies to secure funding for continued development. "Development of a full-scale technology demonstrator is a possibility," the report said. Amid budget cutbacks, one feature is sure to catch the eye of acquisition officials: because of the technology involved in constructing and operating a UHAC, ONR estimates per-unit production and maintenance costs would be less than half that of an LCAC, officials with the project said. The Navy began purchasing its 91 LCACs in the early 1980s at per-unit costs ranging from $22 million to $32 million, or between $45 and $75 million with inflation adjusted.





NEW CHALLENGER to Leopard 2 and Abrams Tanks Russian T 90MS Main Battle Tank
Great tank for Russian military be interesting to see it against the leopard 2 and Abrams tanks The T-90 is a Russian third-generation main battle tank that is essentially a modernisation of the T-72B, incorporating many features of the T-80U (it was originally to be called the T-72BU, later renamed to T-90). It is currently the most modern tank in service with the Russian Ground Forces and Naval Infantry. Although a development of the T-72, the T-90 uses a 125mm 2A46 smoothbore tank gun, 1G46 gunner sights, a new engine, and thermal sights. Standard protective measures include a blend of steel, composite armour, smoke mortars, Kontakt-5 explosive-reactive armor, laser warning receivers, Nakidka camouflage and the Shtora infrared ATGM jamming system. The EMT-7 electromagnetic pulse (EMP) creator has been used in testing but not fitted to T-90s in active service.[3] It is designed and built by Uralvagonzavod, in Nizhny Tagil, Russia. Since 2011, the Russian armed forces have ceased ordering the T-90, and are instead waiting for the development of the Universal Combat Platform T-99 that is expected to enter service in 2020.[4] The performance characteristics of the T-90MS "Tagil" Combat weight, t 48 Crew - 3 Length with gun forward, mm 9530 Length, mm 6860 Overall width, 3460 mm 125-mm cannon 2A46M-5 Ammunition, 40 rounds Guided weapons 9K119M "Reflex-M" Coaxial machine gun 7.62 mm 6P7K Ammunition, shot in 2000 Anti-aircraft machine gun 7.62 mm 6P7K with UDP (T05BV-1) Ammunition, 800 rounds Relic armor Engine In-92S2F2, 1130, p. a. Fuel tank capacity, l 1 200 400 Power density, n. a. / t 24 Maximum speed, km / h 60 Cruising on the highway, 500 km Ground pressure, kgf / cm 0.98 Attention The new 2011 made T-90MS "Tagil" the worlds best tank currently hands down. This tank was named T-90MS on purpose to mislead NATO to believe that its "just an upgraded T-90". While T-90 was upgraded already in 1999 the T-90A "Vladimir" that is current Russian MBT and T-90MS "Tagil" hopefully will be next to enter service soon. This has completely new turret and it is so radically modified and upgraded that it is completely new tank compared to the normal modernized T-90A it has very little in common anymore with the normal T-90 that was made few examples in 1991 or 1993. Anyway, during second Chechen campaign T-90A got hit up to 7 times with different RPGs, modern and old ones and it remained in action. No T-90A tank has ever been destroyed and that is current Russian MBT, it has the longest range of all tanks due to its capability to launch laser guided missiles trough its 125mm smoothbore gun up to 5-6km. Just some few of the new features: T-90MS is production version featuring new explosive reactive armor (ERA) Relikt, new 1,250 PS (920 kW) engine, new improved turret and composite armor, new gun, new thermal imaging Catherine-FC from Thales, an enhanced environmental control system for providing cooled air to the fighting compartment, integrated tactical system, satellite navigation and others. DSHK with IR camera, and PNM Sosna-U gunner view, 7.62mm turret UDP T05BV-1 RWS, GLONASS+inertial navigation, explosive reactive armor (ERA) Relikt and ammunition is now mounted in rear of the turret for improved crew safety and using an improved faster autoloader, the list could go on...etc etc etc. So really its not a "T-90" anymore even...its a whole new different 3.5 generation tank. Design The T-90's main armament is the 2A46M 125 mm smoothbore tank gun. This is a highly modified version of the Sprut anti-tank gun, and is the same gun used as the main armament on the T-80-series tanks. It can be replaced without dismantling the inner turret and is capable of firing armour-piercing fin-stabilized discarding sabot (APFSDS), high-explosive anti-tank (HEAT-FS), and high explosive fragmentation (HE-FRAG) ammunition, as well as 9M119M Refleks anti-tank guided missiles. The Refleks missile has semi-automatic laser beam-riding guidance and a tandem hollow-charge HEAT warhead. It has an effective range of 100 m to 6 km, and takes 17.5 seconds to reach maximum range. Refleks can penetrate about 950 millimetres (37 in) of steel armour and can also engage low-flying air targets such as helicopters.[5] The NSV 12.7mm (12.7x108) remotely controlled anti-aircraft Heavy machine gun can be operated from within the tank by the commander and has a range of 2 km and a cyclic rate of fire of 700--800 rounds per minute with 300 rounds available (the NSV was replaced by the Kord heavy machine gun in the late 1990s). The PKMT 7.62mm (7.62x54mm R) coaxial machine gun weighs about 10.5 kg while the ammunition box carries 250 rounds (7000 rounds carried) and weighs an additional 9.5 kg.[5] Like other modern Russian tanks the 2A46M in the T-90 is fed by an automatic loader which removes the need for a manual loader in the tank and reduces the crew to 3 (commander, gunner, and driver). The autoloader can carry 22





Dayton Air Show 2007 Stealth Bomber Fighter Aircraft Jet
Dayton Air Show 2007 Stealth Bomber Fighter Aircraft Jet





Lamborghini Murcielago vs. Fiat 500 cinquecento
ITALY Mugello Motor Fest 2010 A "simply" chareged Fiat... Stock engine with a "few" mods https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-cP4LtrTH2Y8/UYmBstRq6bI/AAAAAAAADRY/qDqs 7Gzr_hQ/w564-h845-no/IMG_1690.JPG mounting this one... https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/75159_1693970227648_ 6214465_n.jpg





B 52 Bombing Iraq 1991
1991 Gulf War




Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?





Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1979 AMC Spirit : 9.350 @ 143.500
MIKE THERBER, Engine: AMC 401, Supercharger: NA Turbos: NA Tires: HOOSIER


1980 AMC Spirit AMX: 9.420 @ 143.580
James Landis, Engine: 401, Tires: M/T


1975 MG B GT V8: 9.620 @ 137.370
Perry Stephenson, Engine: Rover 3.9 litre modified, Supercharger: GMC 4/71 0 Tires: 28 x 9 x 14 ET Drag


1993 Dodge Stealth Dynamic Racing DR1000: 9.736 @ 151.390
Matt Monett, Turbos: T3/T4 Hybrid


1975 MG B GT V8: 9.810 @ 138.620
Perry Stephenson, Engine: Rover V8 4.9 litre, Supercharger: GMC 4/71 Turbos: none


1975 MG B GT V8: 9.960 @ 136.130
Perry Stephenson, Engine: Rover V8, Supercharger: GMC 4/71


1975 MG B GT V8: 10.290 @ 131.390
Perry Stephenson, Engine: Rover V8 4.6 litre (280 ci), Supercharger: GM 4/71 Tires: MT ET Drag 28x9x15


1996 Dodge Stealth R/T TwinTurbo: 10.396 @ 138.940
Trevor James, Turbos: TD05-7cm2 EVO3 16G's Tires: 275/35/18 BFG G-Force DR's


1975 MG B GT V8: 10.410 @ 129.550
perry stephenson,


1979 AMC Spirit amc spirit: 10.640 @ 124.000
Randy Booker, Engine: 1970/390, Tires: 28.5/10.5/15


1975 MG B GT V8: 10.660 @ 126.510
Perry Stephenson, Engine: 4.6 litre, Supercharger: no Turbos: no Tires: Toyo prox + M/T ET Drags


1982 AMC Spirit gt: 10.860 @ 122.000
Corey, Engine: 408 chevy, Tires: MT Drag Slicks


1983 AMC Spirit GT: 10.916 @ 121.680
Darrel Bible, Engine: AMC 390 bored 20 over, Tires: Goodyear 28x11x15 slicks


1980 AMC Spirit : 11.120 @ 114.000
Mike Miller, Engine: 360, Supercharger: no Turbos: no Tires: M/T-Moroso


1979 AMC Spirit Robbie Carrico: 11.170 @ 119.260
Robbie Carrico,


1979 AMC Spirit : 11.280 @ 119.990
Mike Miller, Engine: 360, Supercharger: no Turbos: no Tires: M/T 10X26


1975 MG B GT V8: 11.560 @ 117.810
Perry Stephenson, Engine: Rover 4.6, 0 0 Tires: Toyo and MT Streets


1979 AMC Spirit Hatchback: 11.590 @ 120.530
Tom Diehl, Engine: 401, Supercharger: no Turbos: no Tires: 26X11.5X15 M/T ET Street


1991 Dodge Stealth R/T Twin Turbo: 11.590 @ 119.680
Chris Turman aka Mellon, Engine: 3.0L V6 stock heads, cams, IC etc.., Supercharger: none Turbos: DR-650R Tires: Nitto 555


1991 Dodge Spirit R/T: 11.680 @ 120.890
Wallace White, Engine: 2.2 DOHC, Turbos: Turbonetics T3T4 50 trim stage 2


 


©2014 DragTimes - Disclaimer