2006-2009 Honda Civic Crash Test

Honda Civic Crash Test

More Videos...

Low-Speed Crash Test 2007 Honda Civic
Pruebas de impacto a baja velocidad al Honda Civic 2007 para analizar su reparabilidad, costos y disponibilidad de refacciones (Cesvi México no emite calificaciones de sus pruebas). Low-speed crash test to 2007 Honda Civic for analyzing its reparability, costs and parts availability (Cesvi Mexico does not rate its test).

2017 Honda Civic Hatchback - Crash Test
Euro NCAP Frontal Impact takes place at 64 Km/h, 40% of the width of the car striking a deformable barrier. In the Full Width test, 100% of the width of the car impacts a rigid barrier at 50 Km/h. In the side impact, a mobile deformable barrier impacts the driver's door at 50 km/h. In the pole test, the car tested is propelled sideways at 32 km/h into a rigid pole. ADULT OCCUPANT Comments The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Honda showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good or adequate. However, for the rear passenger, dummy readings of chest compression indicated a weak level of protection for this part of the body. For the side barrier and side pole tests, the Civic scored maximum points with good protection of all critical body areas. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. However, a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated poor whiplash protection in those positions. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds typical of city driving at which many whiplash injuries are caused, with collisions avoided at all test speeds. CHILD OCCUPANT Comments In the frontal offset test, dummy readings of neck tensions indicated marginal protection for both the 6 and the 10 year dummy. In the 10 year dummy, chest deceleration also indicated weak protection of this part of the chest. In the side barrier test, the head of the 10 year dummy (on the impacted side) 'bottomed out' the curtain airbag and a hard contact was recorded. This hard contact and the head injury values it generated indicated poor head protection. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. Nevertheless, universal restraints failed the installation test on the front passenger seat owing to the position of the buckle. Otherwise, all restraint types for which the Civic is designed could be installed and accommodated in the car. PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION Comments The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian but weak and poor results were recorded along the base of the windscreen and along the stiff windscreen pillars. The protection provided by the bumper to pedestrians' legs was good at all test locations and maximum points were scored. Protection of the pelvis was also good. The autonomous emergency braking system can detect pedestrians as well as other vehicles. In tests, the system performed well with impacts avoided or mitigated at all test speeds. SAFETY ASSIST Comments The autonomous emergency braking system performed well in the tests of its functionality at highways speeds, with collisions avoided or mitigated at all test speeds. The Civic has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. Also standard is an intelligent speed limiter. This indicates the local speed limit to the driver, who can then choose to set the limiter appropriately. A lane keep assistance system alerts the driver when the car is drifting out of lane and gently steers the car away from the lane marking. interior New 2016 2017 Test Drive "SUBSCRIBE NOW"

[CRASH TEST] 2017 Honda Civic vs Toyota Corolla
2017 Honda Civic vs Toyota Corolla. 2017 Honda Civic vs Toyota Corolla Crash Test. 2016 Honda Civic vs Mazda 3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1-nc3UgzbE 2016 Honda Civic Coupe vs Honda Accord Coupe https://youtu.be/AdkaFWp6Nys Top 10 Best Compact SUV 2016/2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGWTTj6uSoY Top 10 Luxury Mid-Size SUV 2016/2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BjftG6AQoc Top 9 Best Full-Size SUV 2016/2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBG7dTaHDFQ Crash Test 2016 Ford Mustang vs 2016 Chevrolet Camaro https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pd_-hzV1Lcc 2017 McLaren 570GT vs 2017 Audi R8 V10 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFg2RIdcKsA Thanks for watching! Subscribe My Channel For More Video: http://www.youtube.com/c/BetterCar -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Follow us on: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BetterCarChannel Twitter: https://twitter.com/BetterCar_TV G+: https://plus.google.com/+BetterCar ******************** Idiot Drivers Compilation Channel: https://goo.gl/15aW0j Supercar Videos: https://goo.gl/jWTx10

Top 10 Worst Vehicle Crash Tests
Top 10 Worst Performing Vehicles in Crash Testing