Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

Audi A7 review - can it match rivals from BMW and Mercedes?

Full review: http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/carreviews/firstdrives/256879/audi_a7_30_tdi.html Is there such a thing as too much choice? Audi clearly doesn't think so. The German firm's range already consists of 20 different body styles, and now there's a new one to choose from -- the new, Mercedes CLS-rivalling A7 Sportback.


 


More Videos...


Audi A7 v Mercedes CLS v Porsche Panamera review - Auto Express
For more videos visit: http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/videos/ It's the car that takes Audi into yet another niche, but has the A7 got what it takes to outmanoeuvre quirky rivals like the Mercedes CLS and Porsche Panamera? Watch our group test video above to find out.





BMW M6 Gran Coupe vs Audi RS7 - Auto Express
BMW M6 Gran Coupe review: http://bit.ly/INJFcP Audi RS7 review: http://bit.ly/1bU3Tif Subscribe to our YouTube channel http://bit.ly/11Ad1j1 Subscribe to the mag http://subscribe.autoexpress.co.uk/yt This is the new Audi RS7 and its arch-rival, the BMW M6 Gran Coupe. Both are powered by turbocharged V8 engines and have over 500bhp -but do they really justify their nearly £100,000 price tags? Watch our video review to find out. The BMW M6 costs just under £98,000 and features a 4.4-litre twin-turbo V8 with 552bhp and 680Nm of torque. It'll sprint from 0-60 in just 4.2 seconds before hitting a limited top speed of 155mph. The Audi has a 4.0-litre twin-turbo V8 yet despite being down on capacity compared to the BMW it produces the same bhp and has even more torque with a huge 700Nm. Once again top speed is limited to 155mph, but it hits 60 in just 3.9 seconds. So, what's the Audi like to drive? Well, the first thing is that it's so hard to use the performance on the road - it's just so fast that it's impossible to put it into use. The one thing the Audi does have is quattro all-wheel drive and a clever sport differential - that means it doesn't have any of the traction issues that you get in the M6, and it doesn't work it's stability control as hard. There's lots of grip, but the problem is it's just a bit inert - there's not a lot of feel in the steering. Also, the suspension is a bit odd. The ride isn't great - in fact it's pretty awful - and all in all it's not a particularly engaging car despite its speed. It's quite hard to love this car despite the fact that the engine is so great. So how does the BMW compare? If anything the BMW engine has a little bit more character than the Audi engine and there's certainly more fizz to the driving experience. It's not perfect and it troubles the traction control quite a lot on a wet road, though. The biggest problem for this car in a way, though isn't the Audi - it's the M6's sister car, the M5. This car is substantially more expensive than the M5 - about £25,000 more than an M5 - and it doesn't offer a huge amount more in terms of driving. So the BMW is the best to drive but it's also the nicest to sit in, with its stylish interior and sporty wrap-around cockpit. The Audi's still feels posh and is loaded with gadgets but it lacks the BMW's wow factor. However with its hatchback boot the Audi is the more practical of the pair. It might cost a lot more money than the BMW M5 but we'd go for the M6 Gran Coupe - it looks great, sounds fantastic and most importantly it's more fun to drive than the Audi RS7.





New Mercedes S-Class vs Audi A8 vs Range Rover - Auto Express
Mercedes S-Class vs Audi A8 vs Range Rover full review: http://bit.ly/17fG17C Mercedes S-Class review: http://bit.ly/16kkEfg Subscribe to our YouTube channel http://bit.ly/11Ad1j1 Subscribe to the mag http://subscribe.autoexpress.co.uk/yt Ever since the first Mercedes S-Class arrived in 1972 it has dominated the Luxury car sector -- until the excellent Range Rover came along recently. So can this new one regain its crown? The Range Rover sets the benchmark for the Mercedes to beat. And starting at around £70,000, this TDV6 Vogue is our pick of the range. By comparison the long wheelbase A8 3.0-litre TDI SE seems a bit of a bargain. At less than £64,000 it's the least expensive car here. The Mercedes S350 L SE costs two thousand pounds more than the Audi, but the S-Class is undoubtedly the most luxurious. The Range Rover comes and impressive second though, with the A8 third. The S-Class is offered with range of seating options. This one has the £4000 Executive Seat package but can pay even more to make them recline up to 43.5 degrees -- that's more than in any other car. The Audi doesn't have such versatile seats but in the back it's no less spacious than the Mercedes. It may be big on the outside but the Range Rover has 80mm less rear legroom than the two Germans. Bearing in mind that these cars are comfy cruisers, the Mercedes is the best to drive, followed by the Range Rover and finally the Audi -- on account of its sporty edge. Both the Audi A8 and the Range Rover are gadget-laden. You can get posh stereos, high tech screens, surround cameras and huge sunroofs in those cars, but being the newest the Mercedes has an advantage. It gets the latest displays, most advanced nigh vision system and even hot stone massage seats. So the S-Class leads the field for technology as well as being the most luxurious plus the best to drive and to be driven in. But there's just one last thing we need to consider. The S-Class's boot capacity is a respectable 510-litres, which is the same as the Audi A8. However, the Range Rover has a 909-litre capacity and, with the seats folded, can swallow 2,030 litres. That means the Range Rover is the most practical and overall it's a better luxury car than the Audi A8. The thing is though, the Mercedes S-Class is even better.





Mercedes CLS review - Auto Express
Full review: http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/carreviews/firstdrives/257923/mercedes_cls_350 _blueefficiency.html It's the original four-door coupé -- and now, the CLS is back for its difficult second instalment! Since 2004, a total of 170,00 customers have been seduced by the big Mercedes' blend of luxury and striking good looks. And it's inspired the likes of the Porsche Panamera and Audi A7. So can the all-new CLS pick up where its predecessor left off?





Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?




Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1984 Pontiac Fiero : 9.744 @ 135.664
Fog, Engine: Buick Stage II V6 273cid, Turbos: PT88 Tires: Hoorier QTPro 14.5


1984 Pontiac Fiero 2M4: 9.898 @ 134.420
John Metric, Engine: Netgain Warp9 X 2, Tires: Eagle GT


1984 Pontiac Fiero 2M4 Electric: 10.439 @ 124.830
John Metric, Engine: Netgain Warp 9 & Transwarp9, Tires: BFG Drag Radials


1990 Yamaha FJ 1200: 10.971 @ 126.230
Andy Bailey, Engine: 1188cc, Tires: Bridgestone BT56


1989 Yamaha FJ FJ 1200: 11.148 @ 120.758
Rusty,


1984 Pontiac Fiero 2M4 Electric: 11.270 @ 106.510
John Metric, Engine: Warp9 and Transwarp9, Tires: BFG Drag Radial 255/60R16


2006 Superformance Coupe Brock: 11.900 @ 119.000
NA, Engine: Stock Roush 427ci V8, Tires: Kumho Ecsta V710: inflated to 24psi Rear: 315/35R1


1986 Pontiac Fiero GT: 11.975 @ 120.590
Justin Bartholomew, Engine: 3800 L67, Supercharger: M90 Tires: 225/50/15 BFG dr


1987 Pontiac Fiero GT: 12.000 @ 123.000
Jeremy Schermerhorn, Engine: 3.8 series II, Turbos: T4 Tires: Dunlop 205/55 - 225/50/16/SP8000


1988 Pontiac Fiero GT: 12.280 @ 111.000
Loyde Rascoe, Engine: 3800 SuperCharged, Supercharger: Eaton Modified


1986 Pontiac Fiero GT: 12.628 @ 107.940
Justin Bartholomew, Engine: 1998 l67, Tires: Good year all season tripple tread


2010 BMW X6 X6 50I V8TT Tune: 12.853 @ 107.040
Enes Hodzic, Turbos: V8TT 4.4


1986 Pontiac Fiero GT: 12.863 @ 103.830
Matthew Howard, Engine: 3800 Series II Supercharged, Supercharger: Eaton M90, Ported/Polished Turbos: None Tires: Firestone Precision Sport


1984 Pontiac Fiero Base: 12.881 @ 104.520
Jason Smith, Engine: 4.3 Chevy V6, Supercharger: Nope Turbos: Nope


1987 Pontiac Fiero : 12.920 @ 109.000
Travis Hall, Engine: 2.8l V6, Tires: Yokohama Parada


1986 Pontiac Fiero GT: 13.084 @ 102.310
Matthew Howard, Engine: 3800 Series II Supercharged, Supercharger: Eaton M90, Ported/Polished Turbos: None Tires: Firestone Precision Sport


1988 BMW 528e Turbo: 13.105 @ 108.388
turbodan, Engine: M20B27, Turbos: Garrett GT2871R .86 Tires: BF Goodrich G-Force Sport


1984 Pontiac Fiero : 13.200 @ 118.000
Steve Hamm, Engine: 2.9l v6, Turbos: Innovative T3/T4 Tires: 245 50zr 16


1986 Pontiac Fiero GT: 13.225 @ 102.400
Matthew Howard, Engine: 3800 Series II Supercharged, Supercharger: Eaton M90, Ported/Polished Turbos: None Tires: Firestone Precision Sport


2009 BMW X6 XI 50 Twin Turbo V8: 13.409 @ 102.320
k campbell, Engine: V8, Turbos: Twin Turbo


 


©2015 DragTimes - Disclaimer - Contact Us