Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

► Historic IIHS Frontal Crash Tests - Car to Car Crashes

More Crash Test on http://www.youcarpress.com


 


More Videos...


► 2008 Renault Laguna - CRASH TEST
More Crash Test on http://www.youcarpress.com





Mercedes C-Class VS Chevrolet Malibu - CRASH TEST





► Mercedes C300 VS Smart ForTwo - CRASH TEST
More Crash Test on http://www.youcarpress.com





► CRASH TEST Porsche Boxster
More Crash Test on http://www.youcarpress.com





1971 VW Beetle vs 1972 Chevy Malibu Classic | Car-To-Car Crash Test by NHTSA | CrashNet1
Volkswagen at 35mph Chevrolet Malibu at 17mph -- Thumbs up for the crash test dummies! Do you think this vehicle is safe? Do you like the test result? More crash tests coming up every week. Favorite this video and subscribe to CrashNet1! Subscribe: http://youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=ikea55 fb: http://www.facebook.com/CrashNet1 g+: http://plus.google.com/104919524738137564116 twitter http://twitter.com/CrashNet1 On the web: http://www.CrashNet1.com





Classic car crash 2
Enjoy





More Old School Crash Tests--





Best Vintage Crash Compilation





OLD Crash Test Chevrolet the first one CRASH TEST
Crash test chevrolet Crash test of Cars , Mobile Phones, Yacht, Motorbike, and ALL......Things !!!





Insurance Vehicle Ratings Chevy Malibu Car Crash into Big Rig Truck car and truck crash
Chevy Malibu Car Crash into Big Rig Truck Global Auto News. Car and truck crash between a Chevy Malibu and a Big Truck truck and car accident car insurance test insurance vehicle ratings.





Best Paint Touch-up Tricks: Mercedes G55
This is one of the worst key scratches I have ever seen. This car needed to be repainted, but I thought I would give it a shot...nothing to lose. It covered 3 separate door panels with varying depth levels. 98% of the 9 feet was through the clear coat, paint, base, and into the substrate. EXTREMELY bad scratch. In this episode, I discuss multiple ways to approach this type of paint damage. I want to be crystal clear: THIS CAR NEEDED TO BE REPAINTED FOR 90-100% satisfaction. My techniques here, with the understanding of the customer, had the best-case final results of 70% to 75% "better or touched-up" appearance. See how it turned out. Thx for watching! -L





2013-2014 New Crash Test Audi A4 BMW Mazda 6
2013 New Crash Test Audi A4 BMW Mazda 6,





DEADLY Crashes: TRUCK vs CARS - Crash Test
DEADLY Crashes: TRUCK vs CARS - Crash Tests - They are among the most serious types of accidents: trucks that go unchecked into the jam-end. Remedy could bring "emergency brake", which for all new trucks are true to the instructions, but do not exploit the technical possibilities. Which leads to fatal consequences, a collision of 70 km / h, shows the ADAC test. This accident will now be defused with vigor by an EU regulation. The technology in the form of an "emergency brake" is already available for it - the only question is, must meet the requirements of electronic aids. The EU proposal of an autonomous reduction of speed by 10 km / h before hitting a stationary obstacle is not the ADAC far enough. The existing technical possibilities will be not even so. The ADAC crash: To make the shortcoming of the upcoming regulation clearly, the ADAC has simulates a classic truck collision in the system crash. A five-ton under truck points clearly meets a lightweight, with a to 70 km / h reduced speed to a jam-end with two passenger cars to another truck shown in practice. Our film sequences clearly demonstrate: the truck pushes the first car on the front standing second. In a split second car number one is deformed until the middle of the vehicle. By the truck involved energy is enough slack to create a more extensive scenario of the worst kind: Cars one sliding under cars Two, which plunges to the front under the front of it another truck - and then perpendicular to the rear sets up! One car has now formed into a laminated core. Not only professionals come here to realize that the chances of survival for all car occupants would approach zero. Optimized systems are available: Which is not necessarily when the ADAC Initiative for the better assistant technology comes into play. Running tests has been demonstrated that optimized systems can clearly do more than required by law. Technically it is possible to achieve a reduction in speed of around 40 km / h (to stationary objects) and to avoid an accident with the car in front completely. Basically: Drive focused, do not allow any distraction Keep sufficient distance Adjust speed to the weather conditions and the traffic volume Requirements: Real accidents show how necessary is the introduction of a sufficiently effective "emergency brake" for trucks. This was confirmed by the corresponding ADAC crash. The technology is available: For driving tests with emergency brake, the truck was at speeds up to 55 km / h (on moving and stationary objects) avoid the accident completely. Even at higher speeds, it would have to be represented, the collision speed limit to a maximum of 40 km / h speed difference to the other party. As the result has been a vehicle of just 5-ton gross weight, this is far too little. Long-term goal must be a reduction to zero in front of a stationary obstacle. Technically, it is already possible, the impact speed at all speeds, as well as stationary obstacles to about 40 km / h limit. Method: In the experiment, an accident is shown in which the driver of a truck with a total weight of 5.55 t recognize the standing traffic jam too late and may reduce his speed due to short braking distance of only 80 km / h to 70 km / h. The simulated jam-end is formed by two cars and a truck rear. The experiment is carried out in accordance with the U.S. Standard FMVSS three hundred and first Constellation (from right to left): Auffahrender Trucks / Cars Related 1 + 2 and rear area of ​​a stationary also) trucks. More info: http://www.adac.de/infotestrat/tests/crash-test/lkw_crash/default.aspx?Comp onentId=82103&SourcePageId=31799 ►THANKS for taking the time to visit, I hope you SUBSCRIBE and enjoy the upcoming videos! I'm an italian petrolhead and cars & motorbikes are my passion which I want to share with all the petrolheads around the world by taking these videos. ►If You like, PLEASE SUBSCRIBE NOW for More videos: http://bit.ly/12ULPud ►Gommeblog.it, Portale dedicato alla Tecnica e Performance di Auto e Moto. Al Suo interno potrai trovare sezioni dedicate a Supercar, Video Test di tutte le più importanti case e bran come Alfa Romeo. Audi, Abarth, BMW, Mercedes, Ferrari, Lamborghini, MTM, AMG, Porsche, Aston Martin, Koenigsegg, Gumpert (solo per citarne alcune) e interssanti video recensioni su gomme Michelin, Pirelli, Dunlop, Goodyear, Continental ... ►Non perderti le Ultime NEWS Video: ISCRIVITI ADESSO AL CANALE: http://bit.ly/12ULPud ►If you like this video Please rate and comment! ►Se questo video ti è piaciuto, Clicca mi Piace o Lascia un commento ►Follow Us on Social Network: ►Google +: https://plus.google.com/101792401712738693835/ ►Facebook: http://facebook.com/gommeblog ►Twitter: https://twitter.com/gommeblog ►Website: http://www.gommeblog.it





Crash Testing the 2013 Volvo XC60! - The Downshift Episode 51
We visit Ruckersville, VA and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's Vehicle Research Center. IIHS is crash testing the 2013 Volvo XC60 in one of their newest tests - the small overlap front test. On this episode of The Downshift, learn why this kind of front overlap impact has such a reputation for killing cars and their passengers, and find out if the Volvo XC60 passes the test. The Downshift appears every other Tuesday on the new Motor Trend channel. http://www.youtube.com/motortrend Subscribe now to make sure you're in on all the action! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_c... Facebook - http://facebook.com/motortrendmag Twitter - http://twitter.com/motortrend Google+ - https://plus.google.com/1018679678590... Website - http://www.motortrend.com





Fifth Gear - Used Car Repaired with Severe Economic Restraint in Crash Test
Fifth Gear's Johnny Smith finds out how a Ford Focus previously involved in a frontal accident and repaired with severe economic restraint performs in a head-on crash test with a similar but non-accident Ford Focus.




Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?





Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1978 Chevrolet G Van Shorty: 9.915 @ 133.840
Dave Jarvis, Engine: 418 CI Small block Chevy!!!!, Tires: Slicks!


1972 Chevrolet G Van : 9.997 @ 134.770
Joe Cheek, Engine: yes, Supercharger: yes Turbos: no


1978 Chevrolet G Van Street Van: 11.001 @ 122.630
paul, Engine: 468, Supercharger: yes Tires: BF Goodrich


1979 Chevrolet G Van : 11.015 @ 114.920
Scott Allen,


1968 Chevrolet G Van 90: 11.193 @ 118.150
Tom Rock, Engine: 383 iron small block, Tires: hoosier 27 x 10.5


1979 Chevrolet G Van : 11.390 @ 119.000
John Karson, Engine: 468, Supercharger: BDS 671 Tires: Mickey Thomson


1970 Chevrolet G Van 90: 11.390 @ 116.980
Tom Evans, Engine: 427sbc, Supercharger: no Turbos: no Tires: 29x14.50x15prodrags


2007 Triumph Tiger 1050 ABS: 11.911 @ 117.085
Platypus,


1979 Chevrolet G Van 10 series: 13.670 @ 98.800
Tony Iggy, Engine: 383 Stroked, Supercharger: B&M High Eneregy low profile Blower Tires: low profile GoodRich


1983 Chevrolet G Van G20 Conversio: 15.927 @ 88.657
Chris, Engine: 1983 van 4 bolt main 305 bored .040, Supercharger: N/A(But is getting a whipple for TBI) Turbos: N/A Tires: P-275/60/R17 Front and P295/50/R17 Rear(Almost ide


1986 GMC Safari : 17.575 @ 75.500
Steven Martin, Engine: 350,


 


©2014 DragTimes - Disclaimer