Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

► Historic IIHS Frontal Crash Tests - Car to Car Crashes

More Crash Test on http://www.youcarpress.com


 


More Videos...


► Fiat 500 vs Audi Q7 - CRASH TEST
► http://www.facebook.com/youcarpress





► 2008 Renault Laguna - CRASH TEST
More Crash Test on http://www.youcarpress.com





► 2009 BMW X6 - CRASH TEST
► http://www.facebook.com/youcarpress





Mercedes C-Class VS Chevrolet Malibu - CRASH TEST





OLD Crash Test Chevrolet the first one CRASH TEST
Crash test chevrolet Crash test of Cars , Mobile Phones, Yacht, Motorbike, and ALL......Things !!!





1971 VW Beetle vs 1972 Chevy Malibu Classic | Car-To-Car Crash Test by NHTSA | CrashNet1
Volkswagen at 35mph Chevrolet Malibu at 17mph -- Thumbs up for the crash test dummies! Do you think this vehicle is safe? Do you like the test result? More crash tests coming up every week. Favorite this video and subscribe to CrashNet1! Subscribe: http://youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=ikea55 fb: http://www.facebook.com/CrashNet1 g+: http://plus.google.com/104919524738137564116 twitter http://twitter.com/CrashNet1 On the web: http://www.CrashNet1.com





Best Vintage Crash Compilation





More Old School Crash Tests--





SMART car crash (TEST)





Crash test autobusu
Už ste niekedy videli crash testy autobusu ? Teraz máte jedinečnú príležitosť..





Classic Mercedes Crash Tests
Crash test with 100 km/h against side of a bus.





2009 Chevy Malibu vs 1959 Bel Air Crash Test
This crash test between a modern sedan and the classic 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air shows just how far passenger protection has come in the last fifty years. The Institute for Highway Safety staged the test to commemorate its 50th anniversary. Find more crash tests on our web site: http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/video-hub/cars/iihs-crash-tests/67619540 5001/?EXTKEY=I93YT01&CMP=OTC-YUTBE





Smart Car Crash Test - Fifth Gear
Here is a classic Fifth Gear clip, the gang decide to crash test the Smart Car. With an NCAP rating of 3 out of 5 stars can the little compact withstand a 70mph crash into re-enforced concrete barriers? For more fantastic car reviews, shoot-outs and all your favourite Fifth Gear moments, subscribe to our Official Channel - https://www.youtube.com/user/fifthgearuk





DEADLY Crashes: TRUCK vs CARS - Crash Test
DEADLY Crashes: TRUCK vs CARS - Crash Tests - They are among the most serious types of accidents: trucks that go unchecked into the jam-end. Remedy could bring "emergency brake", which for all new trucks are true to the instructions, but do not exploit the technical possibilities. Which leads to fatal consequences, a collision of 70 km / h, shows the ADAC test. This accident will now be defused with vigor by an EU regulation. The technology in the form of an "emergency brake" is already available for it - the only question is, must meet the requirements of electronic aids. The EU proposal of an autonomous reduction of speed by 10 km / h before hitting a stationary obstacle is not the ADAC far enough. The existing technical possibilities will be not even so. The ADAC crash: To make the shortcoming of the upcoming regulation clearly, the ADAC has simulates a classic truck collision in the system crash. A five-ton under truck points clearly meets a lightweight, with a to 70 km / h reduced speed to a jam-end with two passenger cars to another truck shown in practice. Our film sequences clearly demonstrate: the truck pushes the first car on the front standing second. In a split second car number one is deformed until the middle of the vehicle. By the truck involved energy is enough slack to create a more extensive scenario of the worst kind: Cars one sliding under cars Two, which plunges to the front under the front of it another truck - and then perpendicular to the rear sets up! One car has now formed into a laminated core. Not only professionals come here to realize that the chances of survival for all car occupants would approach zero. Optimized systems are available: Which is not necessarily when the ADAC Initiative for the better assistant technology comes into play. Running tests has been demonstrated that optimized systems can clearly do more than required by law. Technically it is possible to achieve a reduction in speed of around 40 km / h (to stationary objects) and to avoid an accident with the car in front completely. Basically: Drive focused, do not allow any distraction Keep sufficient distance Adjust speed to the weather conditions and the traffic volume Requirements: Real accidents show how necessary is the introduction of a sufficiently effective "emergency brake" for trucks. This was confirmed by the corresponding ADAC crash. The technology is available: For driving tests with emergency brake, the truck was at speeds up to 55 km / h (on moving and stationary objects) avoid the accident completely. Even at higher speeds, it would have to be represented, the collision speed limit to a maximum of 40 km / h speed difference to the other party. As the result has been a vehicle of just 5-ton gross weight, this is far too little. Long-term goal must be a reduction to zero in front of a stationary obstacle. Technically, it is already possible, the impact speed at all speeds, as well as stationary obstacles to about 40 km / h limit. Method: In the experiment, an accident is shown in which the driver of a truck with a total weight of 5.55 t recognize the standing traffic jam too late and may reduce his speed due to short braking distance of only 80 km / h to 70 km / h. The simulated jam-end is formed by two cars and a truck rear. The experiment is carried out in accordance with the U.S. Standard FMVSS three hundred and first Constellation (from right to left): Auffahrender Trucks / Cars Related 1 + 2 and rear area of ​​a stationary also) trucks. More info: http://www.adac.de/infotestrat/tests/crash-test/lkw_crash/default.aspx?Comp onentId=82103&SourcePageId=31799 ►THANKS for taking the time to visit, I hope you SUBSCRIBE and enjoy the upcoming videos! I'm an italian petrolhead and cars & motorbikes are my passion which I want to share with all the petrolheads around the world by taking these videos. ►If You like, PLEASE SUBSCRIBE NOW for More videos: http://bit.ly/12ULPud ►Gommeblog.it, Portale dedicato alla Tecnica e Performance di Auto e Moto. Al Suo interno potrai trovare sezioni dedicate a Supercar, Video Test di tutte le più importanti case e bran come Alfa Romeo. Audi, Abarth, BMW, Mercedes, Ferrari, Lamborghini, MTM, AMG, Porsche, Aston Martin, Koenigsegg, Gumpert (solo per citarne alcune) e interssanti video recensioni su gomme Michelin, Pirelli, Dunlop, Goodyear, Continental ... ►Non perderti le Ultime NEWS Video: ISCRIVITI ADESSO AL CANALE: http://bit.ly/12ULPud ►If you like this video Please rate and comment! ►Se questo video ti è piaciuto, Clicca mi Piace o Lascia un commento ►Follow Us on Social Network: ►Google +: https://plus.google.com/101792401712738693835/ ►Facebook: http://facebook.com/gommeblog ►Twitter: https://twitter.com/gommeblog ►Website: http://www.gommeblog.it





1960s Crash Tests
A compilation of all the 1960s crash test clips.





Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?




Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

2008 Saab 9-3 9-3ss: 9.940 @ 142.290
Mikael Edstrand, Engine: 2,8t, Turbos: ct43 8079


1991 Audi 200 20v: 11.940 @ 115.110
Nick Sgambelluri, Engine: Stock, Turbos: Garrett GT3076r Tires: General UHP 225-45-17


2001 Saab 9-3 Viggen: 12.433 @ 114.470
Nick Taliaferro, Engine: 2.3, Turbos: Gt2871R .64 Tires: MH 24.5 /8.5 15"


2000 Saab 9-3 viggen: 12.871 @ 112.080
patrick zielinski, Engine: 2.3, Turbos: gtx3071 Tires: m+h 24.5/8.5/15


1998 Saab 9-3 SE 2.0t: 13.000 @ 112.000
Mike Tornberg, Engine: 4 cylindre 2,0 litre Turbo, Turbos: Precision SM32 Tires: Dunlop SP 9000 Sport 235/35-19


2000 Saab 9-3 viggen: 13.381 @ 110.120
Patrick Zielinski, Engine: 2.3 T7, Turbos: GT3071 Tires: M&H slicks 24.5-8.5-15


2007 Saab 9-3 Aero: 13.404 @ 107.950
Brian Blair (VTuner), Engine: 2.8T, Supercharger: NA Turbos: MHI TD04-HLB Super 19T Tires: General Exclaim UHPs 235/45-17s


2006 Saab 9-3 Aero: 13.531 @ 106.390
Aval, Turbos: 19T Tires: 235/45/17 winter tires


2000 Saab 9-3 Viggen: 13.689 @ 105.740
Drew, Engine: 2.3L, Turbos: TD04-19T 6cm^2 Tires: Hankook Ventus V12 Evo, 225/45/17


1999 Saab 9-3 2.0T: 13.780 @ 114.370
Charlotte Evaldsson, Turbos: GTBB28


1999 Saab 9-3 automatic convertible base but added a td04: 14.012 @ 101.720
Connor Rundle, Engine: 2.0 4cly, Supercharger: na Turbos: td04 Tires: toyo proxes 4s


2006 Saab 9-3 Aero: 14.018 @ 103.100
Brown Power aka G5 GXP aka Aval,


2006 Saab 9-3 V6 Aero: 14.049 @ 98.760
Kamil JZW TUNED, Engine: Stock, Supercharger: NA Turbos: Stock


2007 Saab 9-3 Aero: 14.093 @ 102.489
Brian Blair (VTuner), Engine: 2.8T, Supercharger: NA Turbos: MHI TD04-15K (stock) Tires: General Exclaim UHP 235/45-17


2006 Saab 9-3 Aero: 14.180 @ 100.500
Eric JZW-TUNED, Engine: Stock 2.8, Turbos: Stock


2007 Saab 9-3 V6 Aero: 14.182 @ 101.740
Hewad JZW TND, Engine: Stock, Turbos: Stock


2008 Saab 9-3 SS: 14.207 @ 102.850
Brian Blair (VTuner), Turbos: MHI TD04L-16XT Tires: Kelly GT


2001 Saab 9-3 SE: 14.263 @ 97.640
Drew, Engine: 2.0 HOT, Turbos: TD04 6cm Tires: 205's BFG all seasons


2007 Saab 9-3 Aero 2.8T: 14.300 @ 97.260
Juan Nieto, Engine: 2.8T, Turbos: TD04HL-15k Tires: 235/40/18 Falken ZE 912's


2007 Saab 9-3 Aero 2.8T: 14.319 @ 100.970
Max Cohen, Engine: stock, Supercharger: n/a Turbos: stock Tires: Continental Extreem Contact DW


 


©2014 DragTimes - Disclaimer