Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

2013 annd 2014 Nissan Juke Nismo Review and Road Test

Let's get one thing sorted. The picture above is not, I repeat not, the wasabi-snorting-485-horsepower-3.7-second-to-60 Juke that Nissan has been teasing. Instead, this is the Nismo treated Juke we saw at the Chicago Auto Show in February. If you're disappointed, or if the unusual confluence of shapes that is the Juke has made you throw up a little in your mouth, don't watch. Calling the Juke's styling "not everyone's cup of tea" (as one person I met put it) or even "polarizing" hardly begins to describe what's going on here. My week with Nissan's smallest crossover in America was filled with awkward stares, gaping mouths and looks of revulsion. But that's not the whole story. For every 10 people that wanted to run the Juke out-of-town like villagers wielding pitchforks, there were two or three that thought it was fantastic looking. No, cross that, they wanted to bear the Juke's children. That's how far they went. This makes the Juke the most polarizing car design I have seen. Yes, I'm including the unholy Aztec and Rendezvous. However you feel about the Juke's design, you have to admit it took some brass balls to design it, produce it, and then keep selling it. Because the base Juke wears a starting MSRP of $18,990, my expectations were low. If you keep your expectations at a similarly realistic level, you'll be pleasantly surprised. For $22,990 the Nismo version adds heavily bolstered Alcantara sport seats, a leather and Alcantara wrapped steering wheel, center arm rest, red tachometer, plenty of Nismo badges and red-stitching galore. Unfortunately, the standard hard plastic dashboard and the world's least attractive headliner remain. Seriously, this has to be the same material the trunk liner in a Versa is crafted from, how much would it have cost for something out of the Altima? On the flip side, you have to keep reminding yourself that 27-large is as expensive as any Juke gets and the Nismo tops out at $26,460 with navigation, the CVT and AWD. That's well below the average new car transaction price in America. The Alcantara thrones are some of the most attractive (and best bolstered) seats you can find for under $30,000, but they still ride on the same 6-way manual driver's and 4-way passenger's seat frames as the regular Juke. This means the range of motion is limited and lumbar support is non-existent. Still, one must have perspective and you'll find the same situation in most cars this price. I was disappointed to find that the Juke's steering wheel doesn't telescope making it hard for me to find an idea driving position. Before the Juke arrived I had spent a week in the 2013 BMW X6M (our reviews are obviously out of order). Having the Nismo and an X6M back to back may sound like a real let down, but there's another side. Obviously the Juke doesn't handle or accelerate like an M, but there is something of the personality that struck me. No, I'm not just talking about the X6 being similarly polarizing in the style department, I'm talking on the road personality. They are similarly "eager." In this way, the Juke reminded me of a small dog that thinks it's a big dog. It even has a chihuahua's eyes. Is that good or bad? Good seeing as the Juke costs about 1/4th the price. I managed a 7.45 second 0-60 dash in the 6-speed manual model, let's just say the X6M didn't get there in 1/4th the time. It gets a bit more complicated. You see, the Juke is two kinds of animal. If you get the 6-speed manual transmission you get plenty of torque steer, slick shifts and a more engaging ride. (And for some reason torque steer makes me smile when it's on a small-scale like this.) If you get the AWD Nismo, you're stuck with Nissan's CVT. I'm no CVT hater but even I have to admit the CVT dulls the Juke's personality. On the flip side, the torque vectoring AWD system makes the CVT/AWD Nismo the faster car on the track by a reasonable margin. If you have an oddly shaped place in your heart for Nissan's over-styled crossover, you have a difficult decision on your hands. Either way the Juke is destined to be one of the rarer vehicles on American roads and I get the impression that's just how lovers and haters of the Juke like it. Statistics powered by ChannelMeter http://channelmeter.com


 


More Videos...


Ford Focus ST v VW Golf R v Nissan Juke Nismo 0-60 MPH Mashup Review
( http://www.TFLcar.com ) The 2013 Ford Focus ST and the VW Golf R and Nissan Juke Nismo are three of the newest and sportiest hatchback cars that you can buy today. The 2013 Ford Focus ST represents a best of Ford's American and European performance team while the Golf R is the top Golf that you can buy in America. And while the 2013 Nissan Juke Nismo is just a little bit more powerful than the regular Juke it also represents the sportiest 5 door car that Nissan currently builds. So of course we wanted to know which of these hot hatchbacks is the fastest from 0-60 MPH at a mile above sea level. In another fun and informative TFLcar mashup review...we get the entire TFLcar team together to test the cars and crown a winner. Check us out on: Facebook: ( https://www.facebook.com/tflcar ) Twitter: ( https://www.twitter.com/tflcar ) and now even Truck Videos on YouTube at: The Fast Lane Truck ( http://www.youtube.com/user/tflcar )





2014 Nissan Juke NISMO (200hp) - DRIVE & SOUND (1080p FULL HD)
The full Country Road and Autobahn Drive with the 2013/2014 Nissan Juke Nismo with its 1.6 turbo (200hp; 250Nm) FWD and 6-speed manual transmission. You can argue about the styling of the regular Juke but I think this NISMO model doesn't look to bad. Everything else, as engine, suspension and steering is very good, so the engineers at Nissan knew what to do to give this car a sporty feel. Two things to describe how this car feels are "lightness" and "pulltrhough". Since this FWD version only weighs 1.300 kg and gear ratio is short you can really irritate some much more potent cars on the Autobahn. In everything to 160 km/h this car is really quick, almost Mini-like. The interior quality is a improvement to the "standard" Juke as well, since many parts are wrapped in alcantara, which does feel good. I am looking forward to hear your COMMENTS and make sure to LIKE / COMMENT / SUBSCRIBE !





Nissan Juke-R Test Drive - Fifth Gear
Jason gets his hand on the extremely powerful 485bhp Nissan Juke-R prototype for a test drive. For more fantastic car reviews, shoot-outs and all your favourite Fifth Gear moments, subscribe to our Official Channel - https://www.youtube.com/user/fifthgearuk





700 HP Nissan Juke R vs. 900 HP Porsche 911 Turbo. Unlim 500+
Nissan Juke R - 700+ bhp Built by Shpilli Villi Motorsport VS. Porsche 911(997) Mk.1 turbo Switzer | Protomotive - 900 bhp 1 Mile Race Unlim 500+ 9.2012 Enjoy!





Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?




Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1997 Ski-Doo 700 : 10.080 @ 128.000
Craig, Engine: ROTAX,


1997 Ski-Doo 700 Mach 1: 10.180 @ 127.930
Craig Blower, Engine: Iantomassi Rotax,


1994 Saab 900 2.5T: 10.410 @ 142.800
Robert Uhr, Engine: 2.5t, Supercharger: no Turbos: GTBB 35 special Tires: M/H STREET 26* 10.5 -15


1995 Saab 900 SE 2.3: 10.596 @ 138.570
John Williams, Engine: B234R, 2.3 litre, Supercharger: na Turbos: Holset Super 40 Tires: M&H 26x10.5


1988 Porsche 911 Carrera Turbo: 10.760 @ 135.440
JR, Engine: Porsche 3.2, Supercharger: n/a Turbos: Single Tires: Michelins


1995 Saab 900 SE 2.0T: 11.068 @ 124.860
Nick Taliaferro, Engine: 2.0 B205, Turbos: Gt3071R .64 Tires: 24.5x 8.5 MH


2014 Porsche 911 GT3 : 11.310 @ 123.410
RAT, Engine: rear- engine,RWD 3.8 liter H-6 475 hp,


1986 Porsche 911 Carrera: 11.460 @ 118.000
M.R., Engine: 3.3, Supercharger: no Turbos: twin t3/t4 Tires: bf goodrich


2005 Porsche 911 997 Carrera S VF-E Supercharged: 11.680 @ 116.170
D. Sleat, Engine: 3.8L F6, Supercharger: Vortech V2 T-Trim Tires: Michelin Pilot Super Sport


2007 Porsche 911 GT3: 12.010 @ 118.020
NA,


2013 Porsche 911 S: 12.010 @ 116.790
TTF, Engine: 3.8L H6: 400HP,


2012 Porsche 911 991 Carrera S: 12.012 @ 116.790
991, Engine: Flat 6: 400HP,


2009 Porsche 911 Carrera 4S: 12.030 @ 115.070
kouzman, Tires: Michelin Super Sport


2005 Porsche 911 Carrera S Coupe: 12.310 @ 114.810
NA,


1999 Porsche 911 996 C2: 12.360 @ 116.450
PJ Alexandre, Engine: 3.6L swap, Tires: Hoosier R6


2000 Porsche 911 : 12.388 @ 114.050
Antony Oseitutu,


2008 Porsche 911 GT3 RS: 12.410 @ 116.020
NA, Engine: flat-6, Tires: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup


2009 Porsche 911 Carrera: 12.510 @ 113.030
NA, Engine: Flat 6 345HP,


2009 Porsche 911 Carrera 4S: 12.510 @ 113.020
NA, Engine: Flat-6, 385HP,


2005 Porsche 911 Carrera S: 12.610 @ 112.210
NA,


 


©2015 DragTimes - Disclaimer - Contact Us