Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

Battle of the Crossover SUV's: Honda v Mazda v Toyota

LEARN MORE ABOUT CROSSOVERS: http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/Comparos/articleId=128367?tid=edmunds.il.home.photopanel..3.* We keep a couple seven-passenger crossover SUVs in our long-term test fleet and they're indispensable for carting around kids, terriers and lawn furniture. Of course, we still crack the obvious jokes. We'll tell you that these are minivans with hinged doors, SUVs trail-rated for the Starbucks drive-thru, tall wagons that think they're too good to be called tall wagons. But there's nothing superficial or irrational about crossover SUVs like the 2009 Honda Pilot, 2008 Mazda CX-9 or 2008 Toyota Highlander. All three make good on the crossover promise of a vast interior, easy maneuverability and decent fuel economy. Maybe you're aghast that anyone would need three rows of seating, but maybe you've never tried to cram three toddlers in Britax car seats into a Honda Accord. We have. You need that third row. But if that third row were in a minivan, you might find yourself filling a prescription for antidepressants. This leaves you to consider a crossover SUV of medium-to-large proportions. Just about any current-day crossover will accomplish the basics, but the diversity of this vehicle genre might catch you off guard. Even though the 2009 Honda Pilot, 2008 Mazda CX-9 and 2008 Toyota Highlander seem to match one another airbag for airbag, their personalities are so different that you can't drive them without taking sides.


 


More Videos...


Civic v Corolla v Mazda 3 Consumer Comparison by Edmunds.com
http://www.edmunds.com/apps/vdpcontainers/do/vdp/articleId=126610/pageNumbe r=1?flushCache=true As so many Hollywood blockbusters have proven, if something works once, why not try it again? Last year, we decided to try something completely different by inviting six regular consumers to do a comparison test of three popular midsize sedans — without the sponsorship of a specific manufacturer. They poked and prodded each car using the same criteria Edmunds editors use when evaluating a vehicle. The result was an enlightening experience for the consumers involved, the Edmunds.com editors and, judging by feedback, the readers at home. For the sequel, we rounded up three economy sedans: the two best-selling models (Toyota Corolla and Honda Civic) and the one we consider to be the best (Mazda 3). We also invited a fourth dark-horse contender to the party, but the Mitsubishi Lancer that showed up featured a fancy stereo, a sunroof and a $3,000-higher price tag. It was disqualified before the test started for being too far out of the price range. As such, the remaining three contenders were priced within $479 of each other, giving our testers the chance to see how much equipment each brand provides for basically the same amount of dough. Each car was also right off the boat (or train), with miles in the low hundreds or less. In other words, nothing was given an undue advantage. Here's a rundown of the cars.





Toyota vs...Toyota? Camry Hybrid takes on the Prius
LEARN MORE ABOUT TOYOTA HYBRIDS: http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/Comparos/articleId=127826 Guy walks into a Toyota dealer — sounds like a joke so far, right? Not quite. Guy walks into a Toyota dealer looking for a 2008 Toyota Prius. He's heard about hybrids for awhile now, and the Prius is one he knows by name. He vaguely recalls some celebrity bragging about taking one to the Academy Awards instead of a limo, and then there was that South Park episode, "Smug Alert" a couple of years back. And didn't Al Gore's own son make headlines for getting busted doing 100 mph in his Prius? Something like that. Beyond the hype, Guy's never really given hybrid cars much thought, much less gone looking for one. And even though he can afford a decent-size car or SUV, the price of gasoline has him looking for fuel economy in a serious way. And there on the showroom floor, Guy sees a 2008 Toyota Camry Hybrid for almost the same amount of money as a Prius. Now what?





2009 Chevrolet Traverse Full Test
LEARN MORE ABOUT THE CHEVY TRAVERSE: http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/FullTests/articleId=132113?tid= edmunds.il.home.photopanel..1.* If the large, traditional SUV you're giving up represents trans fat, the 2009 Chevrolet Traverse you're replacing it with is unsalted, organic butter churned from the milk of grass-fed cows. This is not a low-fat crossover SUV. Along with its siblings built on GM's Lambda platform architecture, the 2009 Chevy Traverse is the longest and tallest crossover on the market. Yes, it even beats the ungainly Mercedes-Benz R-Class. It's also longer than a Honda Odyssey or Dodge Grand Caravan. If you wanted a bigger family vehicle, you'd have to go back to driving a Chevy Suburban or Ford Expedition EL. And yet just like the sort of large, placid Holstein cow you see on family farms, our 2009 Chevrolet Traverse 2LT AWD is amazingly friendly for something with such a large footprint. It does everything to make sure it doesn't step on you. You start to back up and a built-in camera display takes over the left side of the rearview mirror, while the sonar goes nuts if you get within 10 feet of anything shaped like a toddler. Then you glance to your right and realize you have the choice of looking in the regular side mirror or a built-in blind-spot viewer. All the standard visibility aids on our Chevy Traverse 2LT tester can be overwhelming at first, but the car just wants to help you out. In doing so, though, it reminds you that you're not really downsizing when you get into a seven-passenger crossover. Rather, you're driving an SUV with the safety on.





Volkswagen Tiguan v Honda CR-V v Toyota RAV4
CHECK OUT THE CUTE-UTE SMACKDOWN: http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/Comparos/articleId=131851?tid=e dmunds.il.home.photopanel..1.* We get it already — fuel prices suck. And while we pity the poor sod who bought a new full-size SUV a few years ago and is now stuck with a fuel bill that has doubled and a vehicle whose residual value makes manure futures look appealing, everyone wants solutions. Sympathy won't heal a hemorrhaging wallet. So what's a utility-lovin' small family to do? Downsize. Full-size SUVs provide unmatched capability but their thirst may make you reassess your needs. Think compact utility vehicle. Think crossover. This doesn't mean you have to downsize your expectations, though. The three compact SUVs we've assembled here — the brand-new 2009 Volkswagen Tiguan and the 2008 Honda CR-V and 2008 Toyota RAV4 — are based on car platforms, a strategy that helps create an efficient utilization of interior space in a relatively lightweight, fuel-efficient package. Simply put, you can pack more stuff inside these compact SUVs than you might think. And being car-based, these compact crossovers offer easier entry and exit and better driving maneuverability than truck-based ones, something you really appreciate when you're running errands around town. Of course, car-based SUVs lack the rough-road capability of their bigger brethren, and you can forget about serious towing. For everyday use, though, a compact ute just makes more sense. We tested a 2008 Honda CR-V AWD EX-L with navigation, a 2008 Toyota RAV4 4x4 Limited and a 2009 Volkswagen Tiguan SEL 4Motion. Each one represents a different take on the cute-ute concept and carry distinct strengths and weaknesses but the three turned out to be surprisingly well-matched. Indeed, when the dust settled, we had a tie for 2nd place, and just 4.2 points separate them from the winner. These are no penalty boxes either, as all three tested — the top trim level available — are equipped with all-wheel drive, stability control, leather and heated seats. Two of them have navigation systems with back-up cameras and satellite radio.





Top 4 Brand New Small AWD Crossovers Driven, Tested & Reviewed
( http://www.TFLcar.com ) What's the best Brand new small off-road worthy Crossover that you can buy? In other words, what's the best all-wheel-drive brand new Crossover this year? We at The Fast Lane Car are lucky to drive a different car every week so we've had the chance to drive many (if not most) of the best top new all-wheel-drive Crossovers on the market. So without further delay here are the top 4 new Crossovers that we've driven in 2012 that we think are best off-road worthy new rides to buy this year.





Top 5 small off-road worthy Crossovers reviewed
( http://www.TFLcar.com ) Wikipedia says, "a crossover is a vehicle built on a car platform and combining, in highly variable degrees, features of a sport utility vehicle (SUV) with features from a passenger vehicle, especially those of a station wagon or hatchback." We simply like to say that the crossover is the new family truckster. Here are the Top 5 off-road worthy crossovers that we've driven in 2011.





2011 Toyota Highlander Limited 4x4
A study in how just fine can be just fine.





Little Luxuries - Lux SUVs Comparison
Big on amenities, not in size - We test the hottest lux SUVs from Audi's Q5 to Volvo's XC60. Read the story here: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/112_0907_audi_q5_lexus_rx_350_merc edes_benz_glk350_volvo_xc60/index.html





King Of The Crossovers - Cadillac SRX Vs Lexus RX350
Cadillac's redesigned crossover SRX takes aim at the gold standard in the segment, the Lexus RX350. Read the story here: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/112_0906_cadillac_srx_lexus_rx_350 _comparison_test/index.html





Lux SUVs - Diesel Vs Hybrid Comparo - Part 2
We finally pick a winner in our Diesel Vs Hybrid Luxury SUV comparison test. Part 2 of 2





2011 Mazda CX-9 - Drive Time Review
Drive Time review of the 2011 Mazda CX-9 Grand Touring AWD by auto critic Steve Hammes





Five Gear - best4x4 drive SUV
what's the best 4x4 family car amid theese 10 suv?





Mazda CX-9 Review - Kelley Blue Book
FOR PRICING & SPECS ON THIS CAR VISIT: http://www.kbb.com/KBB/NewCars/Mazda_CX-9.aspx Mazda CX-9. SUVs and sports cars serve very different purposes. One carries people and payload in a roomy, comfortable package; the other delivers a visceral driving experience. You might think trying to combine these traits into one vehicle would be an exercise in futility but thats exactly what Mazda has attempted with the CX-9. Welcome to our comprehensive Kelley Blue Book review of the Mazda CX-9. Mazda is known for infusing a sports car spirit into its lineup. Doing so with a seven-passenger crossover SUV, without sacrificing most of its usability is a tall order. Yet, the CX-9 largely succeeds in balancing these seemingly contrary goals. For more new car reviews, interviews and automotive news visit http://www.kbb.com today.





Mazda CX-7 Review - Kelley Blue Book
FOR PRICING & SPECS ON THIS CAR VISIT: http://www.kbb.com/KBB/NewCars/Mazda_CX-7.aspx Mazda CX-7. With full-size Sport Utility Vehicles falling from public favor, many buyers are turning to a new breed of SUV, the crossover. With controlled ride and handling, a raised seating position and spacious cargo capacity, crossover SUVs combine many of the best features of cars and SUVs into one package. Mazda's CX-7 is a sleek, five-passenger crossover SUV with the heart of a sports car. Welcome our comprehensive Kelley Blue Book review of the Mazda CX-7. Designed to evoke the same sporty image as Mazda's flagship performance coupe, the RX-8, the CX-7 may be the sportiest crossover you can buy for under $25,000. For more new car reviews, interviews and automotive news visit http://www.kbb.com today.





New 2013 Mazda CX-9 0-60 MPH Drive and Review
( http://www.TFLcar.com ) The new 2013 Mazda CX-9 is a sporty family hauler that seats 7 and zips around corners like it has a healthy dose of of Mazda Miata DNA.Gone is the smiley face now replaced by a much more serious and more grown-up new front fascia. The car now looks almost mean and certainly determined as it eats up the corners of your favorite twisty road. In this exclusive TFLcar drive and review we not only see how fast the new 2013 Mazda CX-9 will go from 0-60 MPH but we also check out how the car serves as a family hauler.




Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?





Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1979 Chevrolet Luv : 8.420 @ 162.000
bobby robinson, Engine: 377 sbc, Tires: 28-10.5 m/t back 25/4.5 m/t sportsman front


1978 Chevrolet Luv : 8.460 @ 160.340
Joe Belcher, Engine: 383,


1976 Chevrolet Luv : 9.760 @ 139.190
Bryan Taylor, Engine: 355 ci chevy, Supercharger: B&M 420 MEGA BLOWER Tires: HOOSIER SLICKS


1985 Suzuki GSX GS1150ES: 10.300 @ 135.000
Luke, Engine: 1229cc 16v DOHC,


1972 Chevrolet Luv : 10.340 @ 130.200
Paul Lethlean, Engine: 400 Sbc, Tires: 28x11.5 et drag


1972 Chevrolet Luv : 10.630 @ 125.000
Paul Lethlean, Engine: 400 sbc, Tires: 28x10x15w


1972 Chevrolet Luv : 11.300 @ 118.000
Paul Lethlean, Engine: 410 cube small block chev, Tires: 26


1972 Chevrolet Luv v8: 11.356 @ 115.450
Joey Spitali, Engine: 360 sbc, Tires: hoosier


2007 Suzuki GSX 1400: 11.575 @ 116.420
Barry,


1981 Daihatsu Charade G10: 11.580 @ 119.000
Glen Greig, Engine: Subaru EJ20, Turbos: 2 x TD04


1983 Daihatsu Charade Turbo: 11.821 @ 112.800
Bobby MacPherswon, Engine: 13B Rotary, Turbos: Turbonectics T04E Tires: MH slicks 23.5x7.3x14


1994 Suzuki GSX katana 750f: 11.842 @ 114.760
scott, Tires: michelin pilot 160/ 60/ zr17


2002 Suzuki GSX 600F Katana: 11.892 @ 111.910
Jimmy Graves, Jr., Engine: Stock, Supercharger: N/A Turbos: N/A Tires: Maxxis 120/60-17 F, Bridgestone BT021 160/60-17 Re


1990 Suzuki GSX 750F: 11.977 @ 113.020
Ricky Cole, Engine: 749cc, Tires: Dunlop 208ZR 160/60-17


1997 Suzuki GSX Katana 600cc: 12.020 @ 110.830
Megan (Star Power), Engine: Stock,


2005 Suzuki GSX GSX600F-K5: 12.336 @ 106.200
Jared, Engine: 600cc, Tires: Metzeler Z6 Roadtec


2007 Suzuki GSX 1400: 12.408 @ 111.840
Mark,


1990 Daihatsu Charade GTti: 12.454 @ 109.950
Georg Payrits, Engine: stock, Turbos: T3 50 trim Tires: M&H 23/8/13


1990 Daihatsu Charade G112: 12.719 @ 107.950
Philipp Kruppi, Engine: 1,3 16V Turbo, Turbos: from Subaru


1988 Daihatsu Charade GTti: 13.241 @ 107.000
Georg Payrits, Turbos: VJ14


 


©2014 DragTimes - Disclaimer