Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

Chevy Tahoe (2007) - JRS Test

Here is a Jordan Rollover System (JRS) test on a 2007 Chevy Tahoe to measure the roof strength. This Video Contains both roll 1 and roll 2 of the same vehicle to simulate the actual event of a rollover (rollover accidents usually involve more than one roll). As you will see the A and B pillar both undergo significant roof crush.


 


More Videos...


2012 Chevrolet Suburban/GMC Yukon XL/ Cadillac Escalade ESV NHTSA Side Impact
Driver-***** Passenger-***** Overall-***** (NHTSA Five Star Car)





2007 Ford Expedition 30 Mp/h Dynamic Rollover Test (Two Complete Rolls)
Go here for after-test photos: http://www.facebook.com/pages/CarPro1993/100338693365163 Test #6956 Dummy Information: Driver-Passenger-Rear Passenger HIC 52-60-34 Neck Tension (Flex) 458-451-492 Neck Compression 6605*-1968-3623 *Limit 4000 TEST INFORMATION: The OEM belts and buckles were replaced in all positions. The driver and left rear positions were equipped with a motorized retractor and a pretension buckle system. The right front position was equipped with a non pretension 3-PT belt system. The pretensioners were fired manually at 300ms into the event and the motorized retractors were manually activated prior to launch.





Rollover and side impact crash tests done by a human dummy - Carmageddon Show Pilot
In this pilot episode of Carmageddon Show you will see: - what does it really take to roll a minivan over? - two crash tests with a real life "dummy" Alex. - And a car jump, ending with a crash and rollover. www.carmageddonshow.com





2007 Ford Expedition | Dynamic Rollover Test by NHTSA | CrashNet1
This dynamic rollover crash test was conducted to investigate the dynamics of belted occupants during rollover crashes. This test was conducted with a modified 2007 Ford Expedition on the FMVSS 208 rollover cart moving at 48.1 km/h (29.9 mph), releasing the vehicle with its roll axis perpendicular to the direction of rollover cart motion, and first contacting the passenger's side. The vehicle was modified by replacing the rear seat with a modified front seat to simulate similar characteristics in both seating positions. The center console was also removed. The air bags were disabled for this test condition. The OEM belts and buckles were replaced in all positions. The driver and left rear seats were replaced with a seat with integrated 3-Point belts without pretensioners. The right front position was equipped with a motorized retractor and a pretension buckle system1. The pretensioner was fired manually at 300ms into the event and the motorized retractor was manually activated prior to launch. Thumbs up for the crash test dummies! New crash test videos every week. Favorite this video and subscribe to CrashNet1! Subscribe: http://www.youtube.com/c/CrashNet1 FB: http://www.facebook.com/CrashNet1 G+: http://www.google.com/+CrashNet1 Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/CrashNet1 On the web: http://www.CrashNet1.com





2007 tahoe z71 plaing in sand
tahoe z71 limited edistion





1992 S-10 Rollover Test 1
This is an old 92 S-10 that i sold to a neighbor of mine. he worked for a Crash Test company and this is them rolling my truck!! Found it on my old harddrive and thought i'd put it up here! Enjoy.





2012 Chevrolet Suburban/GMC Yukon XL/ Cadillac Escalade ESV NHTSA Frontal Impact
Driver-***** Passenger-***** Overall-***** (NHTSA Five Star Car)





Crash Test 2011 - 20** Chevrolet Tahoe / GMC Yukon / Cadillac Escalade (Side Pole Test) NHTSA
Stars Awarded : Driver Front Seat / Female : 5 Stars





Volvo XC90 2005
Jordan Rollover System (JRS) Test of the 2005 Volvo XC90. With a roof FMVSS 216 SWR (Strength to Weight Ratio) of 4.6, in this test you will see that even after roll 2 the Volvo's roof withstands the impact at 24 mph and 10 degrees of pitch.





Jeep Grand Cherokee (2007)
Jordan Rollover System (JRS) Test of Jeep Grand Cherokee. This Test included 2 rolls. First we tested the Jeep at 24 mph and 5 deg of pitch, second we tested the same Jeep at the same speed but at an increase degree of pitch (10 deg) simulating a real event of a roll over.





Al Millions corvette rollover
Bob at Al Millions rolling over a yellow Z06 corvette in warminster township.





Chevrolet Tahoe | 2013 | Frontal Crash Test | NHTSA High Speed Camera | CrashNet1
Thumbs up for the crash dummies! Do you think this vehicle is safe when compared to others in the same class? Please comment. Crash test dummies representing an average-sized adult male and a small-sized adult female are placed in the driver and front passenger seats, respectively, and are secured with seat belts. Vehicles are crashed into a fixed barrier at 35 mph (56.3km/h), which is equivalent to a head-on collision between two similar vehicles each moving at 35 mph. Chevy Tahoe LS 4WD 2011 Chevy Tahoe LS 4WD 2012 Chevy Tahoe LS 4WD 2013 Vehicle Test Weight: 5678 lbs. Overall: 4 Stars Frontal: 5 Stars Side: 5 Stars Rollover: 3 Stars -- Thumbs up for the crash test dummies! Do you think this vehicle is safe? Do you like the test result? More crash tests coming up every week. Favorite this video and subscribe to CrashNet1! Subscribe: http://youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=ikea55 fb: http://www.facebook.com/CrashNet1 g+: http://plus.google.com/104919524738137564116 On the web: http://www.CrashNet1.com





SUVs and pickups pose less risk to people in crashes
IIHS news release • September 28, 2011 Effort to make SUVs, pickups less deadly to car occupants in crashes is paying off ARLINGTON, VA - Today's SUVs and pickups pose far less risk to people in cars and minivans than previous generations, a new study from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety shows. Until recently, SUVs and pickups were more likely than cars or minivans of the same weight to be involved in crashes that killed occupants of other cars or minivans. That's no longer the case for SUVs, and for pickups the higher risk is much less pronounced than it had been. Full text of release at http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr092811.html





2011 Chevrolet Tahoe/GMC Yukon/Cadillac Escalade NHTSA Frontal Impact
Driver-***** Passenger-**** Earned ***** Overall





Review: 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe
Go to MYRIDE.COM for more car videos. Driving the 2007 Chevy Tahoe along Virginia's winding two-lanes hooked us. After leaving behind the traffic and congestion of the Washington Beltway, the rural countryside revealed the superior driving dynamics of a conveyance mired in the social consciousness of size, fuel economy and crash compatibility. Thanks to a complete redesign, the 2007 Tahoe is space efficient, gets better fuel economy, and is engineered to be more crash-compatible with traditional passengers cars. Suddenly, out there cruising the Virginia back country, the completely redesigned 2007 Tahoe made all the sense in the world.





Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?




Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1964 Chevrolet Chevy 2: 10.610 @ 117.000
, Engine: 355, Tires: firestone


1991 Chevrolet Chevy S10: 11.526 @ 115.370
Jason Miller, Engine: 350, Tires: micky thomson 32-14.5-15


2003 Chevrolet Tahoe LT: 12.503 @ 105.490
David Bryan, Engine: Stock 5.3, Supercharger: P-1SC Procharger


2005 Chevrolet Chevy Corvette C6: 12.557 @ 110.860
James, Engine: LS2, Tires: Stock non Z51 run flats


1955 Chevrolet Chevy : 12.720 @ 109.500
Ken Abbott, Engine: 454 Chevy, Tires: 28.5 Slicks on rear


1996 Chevrolet Tahoe 4-door: 14.480 @ 93.000
D. Carter, Engine: 5.7 vortec, Supercharger: N/A Turbos: N/A Tires: Drag radials


2015 Chevrolet Tahoe LTZ: 15.210 @ 92.100
CAD, Engine: pushrod 16-valve V-8 325 cu in (5327 cc),


1998 Chevrolet Tahoe LS: 15.600 @ 86.000
Mel, Engine: 5.7, Supercharger: n/a Turbos: n/a Tires: 275/45


2008 Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid: 16.310 @ 88.050
NA, Engine: V8 hybrid, Tires: Bridgestone Dueler H/T


2007 Chevrolet Tahoe LTZ: 16.510 @ 84.110
NA,


2004 Chevrolet Tahoe Z71: 16.700 @ 82.000
NA,


1996 Chevrolet Tahoe 5.7L: 16.800 @ 82.000
Logan, Engine: 5.7L V8, Tires: offroading


 


©2015 DragTimes - Disclaimer - Contact Us