Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

► All-New 2012 Mercedes M-Class CRASH TEST

http://www.youcar.tv


 

More Videos...


2010 Mercedes S-Class CRASH TEST
► http://www.facebook.com/youcarpress





► 2012 Mercedes-Benz ACTROS on the road
► http://www.facebook.com/youcarpress





2012 Mercedes-Benz M-Class - Technics
http://www.youcar.tv





► ALL NEW 2012 Mercedes C-Class facelift
http://www.youcarpress.com





CRASH TEST SLS AMG
http://www.youcar.tv





Mercedes G class crashes Police Car
Black Mercedes G class Russian Mafia Car





Mercedes Benz ML Crash test
http://www.mercedes-wiki.com/wiki/Mercedes_Benz_S_Class





2012 Mercedes-Benz M-Class Test Drive
Mercedes-Benz is elated to keep luxury SUV buyers happy with a reformed 2012 M-Class model that appropriated the strengths of its forerunner and improved on performance, efficiency, safety and modern technological conveniences. On sale in September, M-B will offer two all-wheel drive models to the American market: the direct-injection ML350 4MATIC and the clean diesel ML350 BlueTEC 4MATIC.





Crash test chez Renault
Renault a décidé de faire un crash test collectif de sa gamme. Un ballet de véhicules assez harmonieux et surtout très sympa





Classic Mercedes Crash Tests
Crash test with 100 km/h against side of a bus.





2012 Mercedes M-Class CRASH TEST
http://www.youcar.tv The rating of the Mercedes-Benz M-Class has been upgraded from 2011 to 2012. The car is unchanged and test results have been carried over from the previous year. The 2012 rating reflects the performance of the M-Class against Euro NCAP's latest requirements. Adult occupant The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection for the knees and femurs of both driver and front passenger. Mercedes Benz showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and those sat in different positions. The M Class scored maximum points in the side barrier test. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was adequate and that of all other body areas was good. The front seats and head restraints provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear impact. Child occupant Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both child dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the risk of dangerous head contact. The front passenger airbag can be disabled only by child restraints equipped with Mercedes Benz's automtic sensor system, known as CPOD. As there is no way of disabling the airbag for other rearward-facing restraints, the system was not rewarded by Euro NCAP. Permanently attached labels provided clear warnings of the dangers of using that seating position without first disabling the airbag. Pedestrian The M Class has an 'active' bonnet. Sensors in the bumper detect when a pedestrian has been struck and actuators lift the rear of the bonnet to provide greater clearance to hard structures underneath. Mercedes demonstrated that the system would deploy correctly for a wide range of pedestrian statures, and over a broad speed range. In all areas likely to be struck by the head of an adult, the bonnet provided good protection. In the areas likely to be struck by a child's head, protection was mixed, with areas of good, marginal and poor performance. The protection offered by the front edge of the bonnet to pedestrians was poor.





2012 Mercedes-Benz ML350 BlueTEC HD Video Review
http://drivencarreviews.com/ The 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML350 gets an evolutionary design and some serious improvements to the chassis and cabin. If you're on the fence about buying a diesel, the BlueTEC V6 is a good, strong, torquey reason to take the plunge. Tom Voelk checks out MB's third generation of the M-Class.





Mercedes-Benz 2012 ML350 Interior Special Trailer
Special Interior Info Video - The New 2012 M-Class .............................................. TA :Mercedes-Benz 2012 M-Class SUV GL-Class R-class Ml 300 CDI ML 350 CDI Ml 420 CDI ML 500 Ml 63 AMG Facelift 420 CDI 2011 2013 2014 history Advertisting Commercial Ad Luxury Passion Road Interior Road Star Karl Benz Gottlieb Daimler Das Beste Oder Nichts The best or nothing Germany Car Auto Video Movie V8 v6 AMG Daimler AG High-performance





Mercedes 2012 ML250 4MATIC BlueTEC Trailer
Mercedes-Benz 2012 ML250 4MATIC BlueTEC Desert And Mountain Test Trailer ................................................................................................................................. TA :Mercedes-Benz 2012 M-Class SUV GL-Class R-class Ml 300 CDI ML 350 CDI Ml 420 CDI ML 500 Ml 63 AMG Facelift 420 CDI 2011 2013 2014 history Advertisting Commercial Ad Luxury Passion Road Interior Road Star Karl Benz Gottlieb Daimler Das Beste Oder Nichts The best or nothing Germany Car Auto Video Movie V8 v6 AMG Daimler AG High-performance





Crash Test 2008 - 20** Mercedes Benz ML Class (Front , Side amd Pole Test) Euro NCAP
Safety equipment Front seatbelt pretensioners Front seatbelt load limiters Driver frontal airbag Front passenger frontal airbag Side body airbags Side head airbags Driver knee airbag Car details Tested modelMercedes Benz ML320 CDI Body typeLarge Off Road 4x4 Year of publication2008 Kerb weight2204kg VIN from which rating appliesWDC1641221A 441475 Comments Front impact The Mercedes ML-Class is fitted as standard with 'Pre-Safe'. This system senses when an accident is likely to happen and optimises occupant safety by priming the restraint system. In Euro NCAP's test, 'Pre-Safe' was not engaged so the results reflect the vehicle's performance using only its conventional restraint systems. The occupant compartment and footwell remained stable during the impact. The dummy results showed that the front seat occupants knees and femurs were well protected. Mercedes showed with the use of knee mapping that the driver knee airbag and passenger restraint system would provide similar protection to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different seating positions. Side impact The car scored maximum points for its performance in the side impact and pole tests. Child occupant The label warning of the risks associated with using a child seat on the front passenger seat and the passenger airbag status information that was presented to users wanting to install a child restraint on the front passenger seat were insufficient. A system is available as an option on the ML-Class which automatically recognises when a similarly equipped child restraint is fitted to the front passenger seat and disables the airbag. The system was not fitted to either the test vehicle or Mercedes branded child restraint. Without this equipment, a rearward facing child restraint should not be used in the front passenger seat as the airbag cannot be manually disabled. The presence of ISOFIX anchorages was not clearly marked. Pedestrian The bumper and bonnet leading edge offered only poor protection for a pedestrians' legs. The bonnet top was also rated as predominantly poor for the protection offered to a child's head. Courtesy EuroNCap




Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?




Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1996 Chevrolet Impala SS: 10.374 @ 130.520
Glen Koenig, Engine: 461 LS-6 BBC, Tires: Hoosier 10.5x29W rear, Morose DS2 28x4.5 front


1968 Chevrolet Impala SS 427: 11.339 @ 116.420
C. Moore, Engine: 496 Chevy self built, Tires: M&H rear BFG front


1964 Chevrolet Impala : 11.488 @ 116.620
Jeff, Engine: 406, Tires: MT Drag Radials


2003 Chevrolet Impala LS Turbo: 11.540 @ 120.230
jeffery klo, Engine: 3.8 v6, Turbos: 62-1 Tires: MT ET drags


1996 Chevrolet Impala SS: 11.647 @ 119.360
Glen Koenig, Engine: Stock 354 LT1, Tires: GY Front runners, Hoosier QTP 28x11.5


1996 Chevrolet Impala SS: 11.800 @ 112.000
Joe, Engine: 6.2 LS3, Supercharger: No Turbos: No Tires: Nitto 305/35/18


1996 Chevrolet Impala SS: 11.895 @ 116.650
Terry Kehne, Engine: 385 CID LT1, Tires: front: 275/75R17 Riken, rear 226x10.-15 MT ET Drag


1962 Chevrolet Impala sedan: 11.898 @ 113.067
tony, Engine: 454,


1995 Chevrolet Impala SS ATI ProCharger Supercharger: 11.940 @ 114.770
David Dickey, Engine: 396 Storker LT-1, Supercharger: ATI ProCharger D-1sc Tires: BFG Drag raisals Rear, BFG KDW's front


1970 Chevrolet Impala : 12.430 @ 110.890
GARY KETCH, Engine: 454, Tires: MICKEY THOMPSON SLICKS


1995 Chevrolet Impala SS: 12.853 @ 101.758
David Dickey, Engine: LT-1 converted to LT-4, Tires: BFG g-force comp T/A Drag Radials


1996 Chevrolet Impala SS: 13.100 @ 103.000
Mike Whitehouse, Engine: LT4, Tires: 285/40/17


1979 Chevrolet Impala Coupe: 13.290 @ 105.670
Phil Hunt, Engine: 454, Supercharger: none Turbos: none Tires: m/t I Tread


2004 Chevrolet Impala SS: 13.673 @ 103.130
Ron Mitchell, Engine: 3800 / L67, Supercharger: Gen V / Ported Tires: BFG G Force


2004 Chevrolet Impala SS: 13.674 @ 104.030
Eric, Engine: 3800 L67, Supercharger: Eaton M90


2004 Chevrolet Impala SS: 13.721 @ 100.310
James, Engine: 3800 L67 Supercharged, Supercharger: Eaton M90 Tires: Goodyear Eagle GT


1996 Chevrolet Impala SS: 13.780 @ 98.050
Tim Fiordaliso, Engine: stock, Tires: 275 BFG Drag radials


2009 Toyota Camry SE: 13.800 @ 103.640
SCOTT, Engine: 3.5 V6,


2004 Chevrolet Impala SS: 13.921 @ 99.090
David, Engine: 3800 Series 2 (L67), Supercharger: Eaton M90


2008 Toyota Camry LE: 14.090 @ 98.230
Chad Boren,


 


©2013 DragTimes - Disclaimer