Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

Turbocombustion Green-Engine Technology See How It Works

Development of the TCEngine is halted in favor of a superior clean energy technology.


 


More Videos...


STARGATE MOTOR FULL DEMO
Easy way to make a motor perform to a huge variety of speed or torque settings without having to waste time and money on a custom manufactured order that can't replicate it. Check out my other videos showing this little enhanced motor under load at PMMG4HYBRID. By precise placement of powerful neo magnets to alter the internal permanent magnetic stator field of this DC motor, the flux saturation or desaturation will create an adjustable supermotor from the ordinary. Factory spec output speed and well beyond or higher torque with lower rpm will then be obtained due to modified magnetic fields. http://quantamagnetics.com/





Bourke Engine
The most efficient engine ever built.





Induction Forge - Show and tell
A look at a 15 KW induction forge supplied by Off-Center Products of Washington State





PAUT MOTOR-REVOLUTIONARY ENGINE.wmv
PAUT ENGINE - Prototype 2 is performed as an engine with two-sided pistons, positioned at 90° to each other, in combination with PAUT two-stroke cycles (fig 1). Such construction provides an engine containing less assembling parts, having smaller mass to power and overall-dimensions to power ratios, which are the presumptions for a successful product to be accomplished and for low cost production/exploitation to be expected. Smaller mass, compared to the prior art engines, derives from the fact that PAUT engine contains considerably less assembling parts lacking elements such as: rods, camshafts, camshaft's driving parts, some valves, large heads. The very construction of the two-sided piston (fig 3) has more advantages. Contact area between two-sided piston and cylinder is considerably larger compared to prior art pistons. Hence, specific pressures are lower and since the two-sided piston is lubricated under the pressure, the friction is considerably smaller, the more so as we know that normal force Fn in the engine center equals zero (fig 2a). All these results with less wear of the piston and the cylinder. Such a two-sided piston has considerably smaller mass compared to the prior art assembly it replaces, consisting of two pistons with their prison-shafts and two belonging rods, resulting in lessening of linear motion inertial forces. This construction has still more advantages as compared to prior art engines such as: - better controlled cooling of cylinders not being adjoined to each other - smaller friction inside the engine due to less moving parts - increasing the capacity of this engine, though considerably, results in overall dimensions to increase only slightly - gravity center is posted lower (it is in the engine center) - better forces configuration in the very engine, while negative forces and torques nullify each other completely (fig 2b) - it is possible to dismount pistons and cylinders without entire dismounting of the engine - no special tools nor machines were used to produce this engine - there is less noise due to the design of the two-sided piston - though the cycle is of two-strokes, the lubrication is performed as if it was four-strokes The objections on this construction should be as follows: - due to the compressed construction , the starter should be mounted on the gear box, but with some endeavour it is possible to mount it on the very engine - the force on the output journal of the crankshaft (fig 2a) is twice compared to the one at prior art engines, but this problem becomes negligible with a proper design of the journal and of the operating shaft bearings - there is no oil sump at this engine, hence an additional oil-pump is needed - since it is a two-stroke cycle engine, the engine cylinders are submited to higher mechanical and thermical load comparing to four-strike cycle Prototype 2 - characteristics (technical data): • Two-stroke engine • Engine-block measurments with heads mounted 500mm x 440mm x 440mm • Engine two-sided piston diameter 100 mm • Compressor two-sided piston diameter 120 mm • Two-sided piston stroke 88 mm • Capacity 7000 cm3 • Number of chambers 4(engine) + 4(compressor) • Number of two-sided pistons 2(engine) + 2(compressor) • Weight 135 kg • Power, torque and specific consumption have not been measured as yet.





Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?




Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1979 Chevrolet Caprice Classic Coupe: 9.625 @ 147.000
Peter, Engine: BB Chevy 496 td, Tires: MH


1971 Chevrolet Caprice : 10.400 @ 127.600
Andy Warren, Engine: 427ci Small Block N/A, Tires: Mickey Thompson 28x10.5


1984 Chevrolet Caprice 2dr: 10.768 @ 124.740
YEPPER, Engine: 434 SBC, Tires: HOOSIER


2003 Mercedes-Benz SL55 AMG Convertible : 10.774 @ 130.290
Cnterline, Engine: 5.5 amg, Supercharger: Stock


1971 Chevrolet Caprice 2 Door 406 SBC: 10.800 @ 123.600
Andy Warren, Engine: 406 SBC All Motor, Tires: Front: ET Drag 27x4.5, Rear ET Drag (radial slick)


2003 Mercedes-Benz SL55 AMG Convertible: 10.807 @ 129.990
Cnterline, Engine: 5.5, Supercharger: Stock


2003 Mercedes-Benz SL55 AMG Convertible : 10.887 @ 129.180
Cnterline , Engine: 5.5, Supercharger: Stock Tires: 235/55 19 front M/T 265/40 18 D/R


2003 Mercedes-Benz SL55 AMG Hyevon Motors: 10.898 @ 127.510
URnext,


1984 Chevrolet Caprice 2dr Coupe: 11.085 @ 120.710
YEPPER, Engine: 434ci Small Block Chevy, Tires: BF Goodrich / Hoosier


1971 Chevrolet Caprice : 11.226 @ 116.860
Andy Warren, Engine: 406ci Small Block Chevrolet, Tires: M/T


2003 Mercedes-Benz SL55 AMG VRP 600+: 11.270 @ 124.940
URnext, Engine: VRP,


2011 Chevrolet Caprice PPV: 11.350 @ 119.000
Cop Car Kevin Sullivan, Engine: 6.0 l77, Supercharger: Procharger D1sc


2003 Mercedes-Benz SL55 AMG VRP VR600+: 11.382 @ 123.860
URnext, Tires: BF Drag


2003 Mercedes-Benz SL55 AMG ECU Tune Pulley: 11.421 @ 121.230
jmf003,


2003 Mercedes-Benz SL55 AMG AMG: 11.433 @ 121.590
Kustom2k1, Engine: Stock, Supercharger: stock Tires: Nitto 305/18 DR


2004 Mercedes-Benz SL55 AMG evosport evo3+: 11.496 @ 126.350
Gary K, Engine: evosport evo3+,


2003 Mercedes-Benz SL55 AMG VRP: 11.623 @ 126.010
jmf003,


1977 Chevrolet Caprice : 11.695 @ 113.990
Rich Schneer, Engine: 400 SB Chevy, Supercharger: - Turbos: - Tires: Hoosier Q/T Pro/Moroso Frnt.Runners


2004 Mercedes-Benz SL55 AMG : 11.862 @ 119.340
Mike Scott,


2003 Mercedes-Benz SL55 AMG Pulley Tune Headers: 11.862 @ 121.310
cal1,


 


©2015 DragTimes - Disclaimer - Contact Us