Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

2012 Chevrolet Aveo - ESC TEST

Electronic stability control is standard equipment across the Aveo range, and met Euro NCAP's test requirements. The driver, front passenger and rear seats are all covered by a standard-fit seatelt reminder. A warning is given if the vehicle speed exceeds a limit se by the driver, a system that was also rewarded by Euro NCAP.


 


More Videos...


2012 Chevrolet Orlando - ESC TEST
Electronic stability control is standard on the Orlando and met Euro NCAP's requirements. There is a seatbelt reminder system for the driver and passenger, but not for the rear seats. The Orlando is not available with a speed limitation device.





2012 Hyundai i40 CRASH TEST
The passenger compartment of the i40 remained stable in the frontal impact. A driver knee airbag is standard equipment and dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees, femurs and pelvis for both front seat occupants. The steering column was considered a potential risk but Hyundai demonstrated that other parts of the facia offered good protection. The i40 scored maximum points in the side barrier test and provided adequate chest protection in the more severe side pole impact. The seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive and both the 3 year and the 18 month dummies were properly contained in the side impact test. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position and the i40 provides clear information to the driver regarding the status of the airbag. A permanently attached label gives a clear warning of the dangers of using a rearward facing seat in the passenger seat without first disabling the airbag.





2012 VW Jetta CRASH TEST
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and front passenger. Volkswagen showed that a similar level of protection would be provided for occupants of different sizes and those sat in different positions. Rear seatbelt pretensioners and load- limiters are available as an option on the Jetta but were not fitted to the test car. The Jetta scored maximum points for its performance in the side barrier test. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of rib deflection. The seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.





2012 Chevrolet Aveo CRASH TEST
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection for the knees and femurs of both the driver and front passenger dummies and Chevrolet showed that a similar level of protection would be offered to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different seating positions. The Aveo scored maximum points in the side barrier test, all body regions being well protected. Even in the more severe pole test, the chest was adequately protected. The seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. Maximum points were scored in the dynamic tests for the protection of the 3 year infant. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded by Euro NCAP. Permanently attached labels also provide clear warnings that the passenger airbag should be disabled before a rearward facing child seat can be used in that position.





Electronic Stability Control (ESC) Revealed
The federal government estimates this new technology will save more lives than the airbag! ESC is so efficient in keeping your car on the road that Farmers Insurance even gives a discount on your auto policy if it is installed on your vehicle!





Euro NCAP | Volkswagen Scirocco | 2009 | ESC test
http://euroncap.com/results/escperf.aspx Euro NCAP carried out sine-with-dwell tests according to the ESC GTR global technical regulation, which is based on the US regulation FMVSS126. The testwere completed on all cars whose results were released in 2009. For cars that allowed the ESC system to be switched off, tests were carried out with ESC ON and OFF. Cars were tested by undergoing multiple runs, sometimes as much as 60 per car, each time increasing the steering angle and input. The clip shows the first ESC off test where the car span out. The ESC on test is the one with the same steering input.





Chevrolet Aveo 1,6l 16V LTZ explicit movie 3.avi
More details, pictures and videos: http://www.turatii.ro





Euro NCAP | BMW 5 Series | 2010 | ESC test
Euro NCAP carried out "sine-with-dwell" tests according to the ESC GTR global technical regulation, which is based on the US regulation FMVSS126. For cars that allowed the ESC system to be switched off, tests were carried out with ESC ON and OFF. Cars were tested by undergoing multiple runs, sometimes as much as 60 per car, each time increasing the steering angle and input. The clip shows the 'first ESC off test' where the car span out. The 'ESC on test' is the one with the same steering input.





Euro NCAP | Audi A4 | 2009 | ESC test
http://euroncap.com/results/escperf.aspx Euro NCAP carried out sine-with-dwell tests according to the ESC GTR global technical regulation, which is based on the US regulation FMVSS126. The testwere completed on all cars whose results were released in 2009. For cars that allowed the ESC system to be switched off, tests were carried out with ESC ON and OFF. Cars were tested by undergoing multiple runs, sometimes as much as 60 per car, each time increasing the steering angle and input. The clip shows the first ESC off test where the car span out. The ESC on test is the one with the same steering input.





Chevrolet Sonic Roadtrip
In May 2011, the Chevy engineers who designed the new 2012 Sonic took the car out for an extreme real-world road test from Colorado to California. See firsthand how it feels to see a car go from a blank piece of paper to full production and then drive it from summit to sea.





BMW Skidpad - Dynamic Stability Control Off vs On
We shot this during one of the driving events as part of our BMW Performance Center Delivery Experience (highly recomend!)





2012 Chevrolet Sonic side IIHS crash test
2012 Chevrolet Sonic 31 mph side IIHS crash test Overall evaluation: Good Full rating at http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=1563





Crash Test 2012 - Chevrolet Sonic / Aveo (Frontal Offset) IIHS
Chevrolet Sonic 2012 models 2012 Chevrolet Sonic: good performance in front, side, rollover, and rear tests and standard electronic stability control FRONTAL OFFSET TEST OVERALL EVALUATION: Structure/safety cage Injury measures Restraints/dummy kinematics Head/neck Chest Leg/foot, left Leg/foot, right Important: Frontal crash test ratings can be compared only among vehicles of similar weight. Good Acceptable Marginal Poor Test details: The Chevrolet Sonic was introduced in the 2012 model year as a replacement for the Chevrolet Aveo. Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement was well controlled. The driver side curtain airbag deployed during the crash. After the dummy moved forward into the frontal airbag, its head contacted the side curtain airbag. Injury measures — Measures taken from the neck, chest, and both legs indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity. A high head acceleration occurred when the dummy's head hit the steering wheel through the airbag, indicating that head injuries would be possible.





Euro NCAP | Suzuki Swift | 2010 | ESC test
Euro NCAP carried out "sine-with-dwell" tests according to the ESC GTR global technical regulation, which is based on the US regulation FMVSS126. For cars that allowed the ESC system to be switched off, tests were carried out with ESC ON and OFF. Cars were tested by undergoing multiple runs, sometimes as much as 60 per car, each time increasing the steering angle and input. The clip shows the 'first ESC off test' where the car span out. The 'ESC on test' is the one with the same steering input.





Тест-драйв: Chevrolet Aveo 4
Антон Казаков - Chevrolet Aveo 4





Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?




Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

2005 Chevrolet Aveo LS: 12.540 @ 115.000
Christian Nolen, Engine: 1.6 ecotec 2, Supercharger: n/a Turbos: garett t-4 turbo


2005 Chevrolet Aveo ls: 17.010 @ 81.000
justin kueneman, Engine: 1.6 ecotec,


2004 Chevrolet Aveo LS: 17.400 @ 79.000
NA,


2005 Chevrolet Aveo LT: 17.635 @ 78.500
Joseph D'Amato,


2007 Chevrolet Aveo LT: 18.110 @ 76.020
NA,


 


©2014 DragTimes - Disclaimer - Contact Us