5.0 Mustang "bare-knuckled" LX vs 5.7 Camaro Z28 (Mustang-Town Showdown)

www.Mustang-Town.com features another Mustang-Town Showdown featuring a classic Camaro vs Mustang street match-up... The 1993 LT1 Camaro is a fairly stock but "loaded" down with options automatic and couple bolt-on mods, and the 1989 Mustang 5.0 is a "bare-knuckled" stripper 5-speed with full Exhaust, gears and a few minor bolt-ons... a very stripped down version, light and low "bare-bones" optioned LX, with gutted interior panels, No passenger seat or back seat, and probably weighs around 700 lbs under the Camaro. I'm sure the LT1 guys will leave a few comments on this one, lol.... so easy fellas, it's all American Iron, lol. Produced by nedaCFilms / Mustang-Town

More Videos...


408 LSX/Big Compression Mustang vs. 408/Spray camaro
damn racecars





3rd Gen Camaro - Fox-body Mustang (the good, bad and the ugly)
Most car guys don't know the difference between the 230hp G92 optioned models, or the 5-speed and automatic models, or the 170hp lackluster TBI versions (not to be confused with TPI versions)... Mustang guys smoke the 170hp TBI models, as well as the "run of the mill" TPI automatic models, and believe they can do this to any and all. Well, not all 3rd Gen F-bodies are created equal. Optioned from the factory with the 230hp TPI (not TBI) engine, manual 5-speed tranny and 3.42 gears, these 3rd Gen F-body sleepers gave 5.0 Mustangs absolute hell. In 1990 the G92 option code became a full performance package rather than simply a rear axle option as in previous model years... GM also offered an answer to the Saleen Mustangs by way of option 1LE, which consisted of the G92 optioned without A/C and other creature comforts, and the addition of Corvette brakes and other road racing equipment. About the only way an IROC-Z Camaro could take out a 5.0L Mustang from this era was with the Tuned Port Induction and addition of these performance options: G92, 1LE, L98 or B4C. The TBI powered Camaro were not at all in the same league as the performance version TPI Camaro, or 5.0 Mustang, these 170hp TBI models were GM's economy de-tuned versions and were around 50-60 less horsepower versus the performance optioned TPI models. These non-performing models gave the 3rd Gen F-bodies a bad rep on the street... many think that these were the example of 3rd Gen F-bodies, when in fact, and unlike Ford, GM offered many models, with many engines, camshafts and rear-gear ratios... For more info on these rare optioned Camaro & Firebird, check out http://www.V8ponycars.com or the Mustang guys can check out http://www.Mustang-Town.com Produced by nedaCFilms For more details on the G92-optioned F-Bodies, check out: http://nedacfilms.hubpages.com/hub/Camaro-VS-Mustang-Revisited





Chevrolet Camaro SS 6.2 vs Ford Mustang 5.0 - Acceleration 0-150mph
Car comparison test of Chevrolet Camaro SS 6.2 vs Ford Mustang 5.0 . We compare Chevrolet Camaro SS 6.2 vs Ford Mustang 5.0 sounds, revs, acceleration 0-170mph , power, sprint and Exhaust sound. Send me your car videos here: slizo3310@gmail.com We do NOT own the video materials and all credits belong to respectful owners. In case of copyright issues, please contact us immediately for further credits or clip delete. DISCLAIMER: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing." The materials are used for illustrative and exemplification reasons, also quoting in order to recombine elements to make a new work.





Fast Mustang.... 800 Horsepower.
Pulling out the 800HP Beast.




Follow