Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

Crash Test: 2007 Hyundai Accent/Kia Rio

Go to MYRIDE.COM for more car videos. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Crash Test: 2007 Hyundai Accent/ Kia Rio.


 


More Videos...


Crash Test: 2008 Smart Car ForTwo
Get more info on the Smartcar http://www.autobytel.com/new-cars/smart/?id=32973 In recent Insurance Institute for Highway Safety tests, the 2008 Smart Fortwo, the smallest car for sale in the US market, earned the top rating of good for front and side crash protection. Its seat/head restraints earned the second highest rating of acceptable for protection against whiplash in rear impacts. Smart Fortwo is classified a microcar, meaning it's smaller even than minicars. Weighing about 1,800 pounds, the Smart is more than 3 feet shorter and almost 700 pounds lighter than a Mini Cooper.





Review: 2007 Hummer H2
Go to MYRIDE.COM for more car videos. Driving around in a Hummer H2 during these times of environmental awareness and oil industry uncertainty can make you feel a little uncomfortable, but does the Hummer really deserve the scourge of the greenies?





Review: 2006 Hyundai Accent
Go to MYRIDE.COM for more car videos. Over the years, Hyundai has transformed from a company that offered one inferior small car into a powerhouse that sells near-luxury cars like the Azera and capable SUVs such as the Santa Fe and Tucson. There's also the 2006 Accent, the company's entry-level small car, a totally redesigned model that best demonstrates Hyundai's continued commitment to one of its main goals -- offering customers capable cars that are well-backed and affordably priced.





Crash Test: 2006 Mini Cooper
Go to MYRIDE.COM for more car videos. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Crash Test: 2006 Mini Cooper.





Crash Test Month: Van vs. Car
Welcome to Fifth Gear Crash Test Month! In our eighth video, we see the effects of a head on collision involving a typical van and a car. For more fantastic car reviews, shoot-outs and all your favourite Fifth Gear moments, subscribe to our Official Channel - https://www.youtube.com/user/fifthgearuk





2009 Chevy Malibu vs 1959 Bel Air Crash Test
This crash test between a modern sedan and the classic 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air shows just how far passenger protection has come in the last fifty years. The Institute for Highway Safety staged the test to commemorate its 50th anniversary. Find more crash tests on our web site: http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/video-hub/cars/iihs-crash-tests/67619540 5001/?EXTKEY=I93YT01&CMP=OTC-YUTBE





2010 Hyundai Accent GS 3-Door Start Up, Engine, and In Depth Tour/Review
In this video I give a full in depth tour of the 2010 Hyundai Accent GS 3-door. I take viewers on a close look through the interior and exterior of this car while showing details, over viewing of features, and noting unique styling cues to the vehicle itself. I also show the engine and the details of it, start it up and see how it sounds under acceleration. A thorough tour/review of this car designed to give others a greater overall appreciation of the vehicle.





SMART car crash (TEST)





2013-2015 New Crash Test Audi A4 BMW Mazda 6
2013-2015 New Crash Test Audi A4 BMW Mazda 6,





Hyundai Accent | 2012 | Pole Crash Test | High Speed Camera | NHTSA HD
2012 2013 Hyundai Accent 4 DR FWD 현대 엑센트 Hyundai Verna Overall: 4 Stars Frontal: 4 Stars Side: 4 Stars Rollover: 4 Stars A small-sized adult female crash test dummy is placed in the driver's seat and is secured with a seat belt. The test vehicle, angled at 75 degrees, is then pulled sideways at 20 mph into a 25-cm diameter pole at the driver's seating location. This test mimics a side impact crash involving a narrow, fixed object like a utility pole or tree. -- Thumbs up for the crash dummies! Do you think this vehicle is safe when compared to others in the same class? Please comment. More crash tests every week: Favorite this video and Subscribe to CrashNet1! http://youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=ikea55





2015 Honda City Vs Hyundai Verna I Comparison Video I CarDekho.com
Watch Honda City vs Hyundai Verna Comparison by CarDekho. Know more about City at : http://www.cardekho.com/carmodels/Honda/Honda_City and about Verna at http://www.cardekho.com/carmodels/Hyundai/Hyundai_Verna Video review : Hyundai Verna VS Honda City The video gives an in depth comparison between Honda City and Hyundai Verna 4S. It lets you make a better choice by projecting the different fields where Verna and City excel. The comparison starts with the exteriors of both cars, on the front side the nose of Verna looks better with its twin slated chrome grill that makes more sense over City’s fat single piece grill. Moving towards the side both cars have distinct character and shoulder line but City is a new car as Verna with its facelift only got changes at front and rear, while the sides are unchanged. The wheels of both cars attract equally as the diamond cut alloys of Verna look apart , City’s dynamic 5-spoke make a statement of their own. At the rear City stands as a clear winner with its wide angular taillight joined by a sleek dash of chrome. Dimensionally, Verna and City gets LxWxH as 4375x1700x1475mm and 4440x1695x1495 respectively. While the wheelbase stands at 2600 mm for Honda and 2570 mm for Verna. And mechanically, City gets 1.5 litre i-DTEC that produces 100 PS of power and 200 Nm of Torque. Verna gets a 1.6 litre CRDi motor that produces 128 PS of power and 260 Nm of torque. Both have good fuel economy, but Verna puts out a figure of 23.6 kmpl while City gets an edge with its 26 kmpl. Performance-wise, Verna gets a strong diesel that helps it pull strongly after 1900 rpms - turbo lag interferes before that - but once it crosses the 1900 mark it gets very active. The City, on the other hand manages the lag in a better way and is smooth to pull. The cabin noise is lesser in Verna than the City. City’s drive is much more composed than that of Verna as it stays grounded and the weight transfer to the steering is just fine. And comparatively the suspension of Honda is on the stiffer side but that too inspires confidence. The road noise filters inside more in comparison to the Verna. Inside of these two are in tandem with the time but Honda seems to have an edge as Verna’s cabin is the same as the old car. Honda’s infotainment system gets a better touchscreen with Sat Nav, it also gets sun/moon roof that is absent in Verna. Also, the interior space of City is far better than that of Verna, at the rear City can comfortably accommodate a tall person of over 6 ft height while in case of Verna it is a very tight fit. The boot compartment of Honda might be 510 litre over Verna’s 460 litres but the latter fits luggage more neatly. On the price perspective both are priced very competitively, Honda City falls in a bracket of Rs. 7.5 to 11.8 lacs while Verna falls in Rs. 7.7 to 12.1 lacs (all prices ex-showroom delhi). Verdict : Honda City will be a better choice if your preference is to give equal luxury to every passenger as it is a better family car with more space and comfort. And if you are a person that usually drive alone and prefer performance over mileage and comfort you should go for Hyundai Verna.





TOP 10 WORST CRASH TESTS
UPDATED VERSION: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRyAB1aC0bw Thanks For Watching! Make Sure You Leave A Like! And Make Sure You Subscribe To Me And Others! Twitter: https://twitter.com/rp01ful https://twitter.com/RP01fulYoutube RP01ful : http://www.youtube.com/user/RP01ful Mr Geoclay : http://www.youtube.com/user/MrGeoclay Hi!, It's Regan : http://www.youtube.com/channel/UClVzxtLAINUdDv-JIP7XB0A exL Aquas : http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbo0RvMR7MAfo4KOHlNDlyg Theawsomegamer: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZ-pj2aAST-0FMr96hsyrxg Make Sure You Like My friends Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/snapsaplenty





Hyundai Accent | 2012 | Frontal Crash Test | High Speed Camera | NHTSA HD
NHTSA Frontal test 2012 2013 Hyundai Accent 4 DR FWD (Hyundai Verna) (Dodge Attitude) The 2012 Hyundai Accent was tested by the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and received the following: Overall: 4 Stars* Frontal: 4 Stars Side: 4 Stars* Rollover: 4 Stars *Due to the intrusion of the left rear door during the side impact test, the interior door panel struck the torso of the rear passenger dummy, causing a high lower spine acceleration. High lower spine accelerations, in excess of 82 g's, indicate a higher likelihood of thoracic injury. Note: Although not included in the star rating, the rear passenger's abdominal rib deflection was elevated. The 2012 Hyundai Accent was tested by the IIHS and received a "Good" rating in the frontal offset test, an "Acceptable" rating in the side impact test, and a "Good" rating in the roof strength test. It also received a "Good" rating in the rear crash protection (head restraint) test. Awesome crash test!!!





The New face-lifted Hyundai VERNA 4S 2015 INTERIOR REVIEW
The most awaited New Face lifted Hyundai fluidic VERNA 4S 2015 !!! wow awesome... New Verna 4S is more matured, but the style and design is not as appealing as the last edition. Although the features are hiked a little bit , some of them are removed.... The new Verna 4S 2015 is having a stunning interior and equipped with latest Korean electronic technologies. just see it and comment if you like.....!!! ----New Hyundai Verna 4S INTERIOR REVIEW------





2015 Hyundai Accent Start Up and Review 1.6 L 4-Cylinder
Like Us on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/pages/Camerons-Car-Reviews/349462695066112?ref=hl Follow Us on Instagram: cameronscarreviews Snapchat: camscarreviews Camerons Car Reviews Score: 4/5 Powertrain Options: 1.6 L 4-Cylinder with a 6-Speed Manual or Automatic FWD Engine & Performance BASE ENGINE SIZE 1.6 L CAM TYPE Double overhead cam (DOHC) CYLINDERS Inline 4 VALVES 16 VALVE TIMING Variable TORQUE 123 ft-lbs. @ 4850 rpm horsepower 137 hp @ 6300 rpm Weights and Capacities MAXIMUM PAYLOAD** 994 lbs. EPA INTERIOR VOLUME 111.3 cu.ft. GROSS WEIGHT 3549 lbs. CURB WEIGHT 2555 lbs. CARGO CAPACITY, ALL SEATS IN PLACE 21.2 cu.ft. MAXIMUM CARGO CAPACITY 47.5 cu.ft. Fuel ENGINE TYPE Gas FUEL TYPE Regular unleaded FUEL TANK CAPACITY 11.4 gal. RANGE IN MILES (CTY/HWY) 296.4/421.8 mi. EPA MILEAGE EST. (CTY/HWY) 26/37 mpg Competitors: Toyota Yaris, Ford Fiesta, Chevrolet Sonic, Honda Fit, Kia Rio





Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?




Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1997 Hyundai Accent gt: 9.610 @ 143.000
kurt garmendia, Engine: 2.0 liters, Supercharger: none Turbos: gt 35R Tires: 26 x 10


1998 Hyundai Accent : 11.060 @ 129.000
reno nunu malta, Engine: 1500, Turbos: turbonetics Tires: 23


1997 Hyundai Accent gs Turbo: 11.730 @ 118.000
jeffrey gonzales, Engine: 1.5 sohc, Turbos: to3 60 -.63 Tires: 24.5x8


1999 Hyundai Accent base: 13.889 @ 101.830
Denis, Engine: beta 2.0, Supercharger: none Turbos: none Tires: flaken 512 205/45/16


1997 Hyundai Accent : 15.200 @ 89.000
Brian H, Engine: 1.5l SOCH, Tires: firestone firehawk sh30 195 50's


1995 Hyundai Accent : 15.200 @ 90.000
alvin colon, Engine: 2.0 doch beta, Tires: bridgestone potenza


2003 Kia Rio : 15.471 @ 89.610
Matt, Engine: A6D, Turbos: Garrett GT1752


2002 Hyundai Accent L: 15.665 @ 83.480
Kenneth Bailey, Engine: 2.0L,


2000 Hyundai Accent Verna Turbo: 15.725 @ 85.000
Alfonso Quinones, Engine: 1.5 DOHC 12V, Turbos: Garret T3 Tires: 175/70/13


1998 Hyundai Accent L: 15.805 @ 87.730
luke, Engine: 1.5L sohc 12v, Turbos: T25 Tires: 185/60/14 performance all seasons


1997 Hyundai Accent GL: 16.220 @ 88.000
sleeper,


2002 Hyundai Accent GSI: 16.350 @ 83.320
pier-olivier lazure, Engine: 1.6L, Tires: exclaim UHP 15''


2012 Hyundai Accent SE: 16.400 @ 86.000
et, Engine: DOHC 16-valve inline-4, Tires: Kumho Solus KH25 P195/50R-16 83H


2009 Hyundai Accent Gl: 16.641 @ 80.740
Pier-Luc Boucher,


2002 Kia Rio : 16.774 @ 80.520
Judd,


2002 Kia Rio : 17.033 @ 78.016
David, Engine: 1.5L DOHC, Supercharger: none Turbos: none Tires: Kumho Ecsta 711 195/50R15


2012 Kia Rio 5 SX: 17.200 @ 81.000
et, Engine: DOHC 16- valve inline-4, Tires: Hankook Optimo H426 205/45R-17 94V


2003 Hyundai Accent GSI (GT): 17.313 @ 79.280
DT, Engine: 1.6L DOHC, Tires: 185/60R14 XGT Mitchelin


2004 Hyundai Accent : 17.792 @ 86.000
Edward Carr, Engine: 1.6l, Supercharger: none Turbos: none


2010 Hyundai Accent SE: 17.859 @ 76.250
Ray, Engine: 1.6, Supercharger: n/a Turbos: n/a


 


©2015 DragTimes - Disclaimer - Contact Us