Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

Crash Test 2008 - Saturn (Discontinued) / Opel / Holden Astra (Side Impact) IIHS

Saturn Astra 2008 models SIDE IMPACT TEST WITH STANDARD SIDE AIRBAGS OVERALL EVALUATION: Marginal Injury measures Head protection Structure/safety cage Head/neck Torso Pelvis/leg Driver Good Acceptable Good Good Acceptable Rear passenger Good Poor Acceptable Good Important: Side impact crash test ratings can be compared across vehicle type and weight categories. Test details: The Saturn Astra was introduced in the 2008 model year. Injury measures: Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that rib fractures and/or internal organ injuries would be possible in a crash of this severity. The risk of significant injuries to other body regions is low. Rear passenger — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that rib fractures and/or internal organ injuries as well as a left femur fracture would be possible in a crash of this severity. In addition, loading to the shoulder was excessive. Head protection: Driver — The dummys head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof and a side airbag that deployed from the seat. Rear passenger — The dummys head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.


 


More Videos...


2008 Saturn Astra moderate overlap IIHS crash test
2008 Saturn Astra 40 mph moderate overlap IIHS crash test Overall evaluation: Good Full rating at http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=1038&seriesid=650





Crash Test 2009 Subaru Impreza (Full Test) EuroNcap
Specifications Tested model Subaru Impreza 2.0R, RHD Body type 5 door hatchback Year of publication 2009 Kerb weight 1370kg VIN from which rating applies applies to Imprezas ordered from February 18 onwards Class SMALL FAMILY Safety equipment Front seatbelt pretensioners Front seatbelt load limiters Driver frontal airbag single stage Front passenger frontal airbag single stage Side body airbags Side head airbags Comments Adult occupant The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal test, the windscreen pillar moving rearward by only 3mm. The knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger were well protected. Subaru showed that occupants of different sizes, or those sat in different positions, would be similarly well protected. High rib deflections indicated poor protection of the chest in the side pole test. Inspection of the car after the side barrier impact revealed that the rear door on the struck side was prevented from opening fully only by the secondary latch, for which the car was penalised. The protection offered against whiplash injury was rated as marginal. Child occupant Based on dummy readings alone, the Impreza scored maximum points for protection of the 3 year old in the front and side impacts. The passenger airbag cannot be disabled so a rearward facing child restraint should not be used in that seating position. The label warning of the dangers of doing so was not available in the languages of all the countries in which the car is sold and was not rewarded. The presence of ISOFIX anchorages in the rear outboard seats was not clearly marked. Pedestrian The bumper scored maximum points for the protection offered to pedestrian's legs. The bonnet offered good protection in most areas likely to be hit by a child's head. Safety assist As a result of Euro NCAP's new rating scheme, Subaru have made electronic stability control more widely available. From the middle of February 2009, Subaru Vehicle Dynamics Control is available as standard on most Impreza variants and as an option on all others throughout Europe. Consumers should be aware that some cars in stock may not be equipped with Vehicle Dynamics Control and Euro NCAP encourages them to choose those which are. The car has a seatbelt reminder system for the driver's seat.





ADAC crash test sperimentale offset 20% [SUB-ITA]
http://www.sicurauto.it - Crash test effettuato da ADAC per verificare e migliorare la protezione negli impatti con poca sovrapposizione del frontale. Test offset 20% a 64 km/h. Sottotitoli in italiano a cura di SicurAUTO.it





2008 Saturn Astra side IIHS crash test
2008 Saturn Astra 31 mph side IIHS crash test Overall evaluation: Marginal Full rating at http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=1039





Opel Astra GTC
Opel Astra GTC Diesel





Auto Crash Test - Autogas Crash und Brand





Crash Test 2008 - Discontinued (Saturn) / Holden / Opel Astra (Frontal Impact) IIHS
Saturn Astra 2008 models FRONTAL OFFSET TEST OVERALL EVALUATION: Good Structure/safety cage Injury measures Restraints/dummy kinematics Head/neck Chest Leg/foot, left Leg/foot, right Good Good Good Good Good Acceptable Important: Frontal crash test ratings can be compared only among vehicles of similar weight. Test details: The Saturn Astra was introduced in the 2008 model year. Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement was reasonably well controlled. During rebound, the dummy's head leaned partway out the open side window and hit the top and rear portions of the window frame. Injury measures — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity. Head accelerations from the window frame hits were low.





Euro NCAP | Opel/Vauxhall Astra | 2004 | Crash test
http://www.euroncap.com/tests/opel_vauxhall_astra_2004/185.aspx Frontal Impact takes place at 64 Km/h, 40% of the width of the car striking a deformable barrier. In the side impact, a mobile deformable barrier impacts the driver's door at 50 km/h. In the pole test, the car tested is propelled sideways at 29km/h into a rigid pole.





Crash Test 2009 Toyota iQ (Full Test) EuroNcap
Specifications Tested model Toyota iQ 1.0, LHD Body type 3 door hatchback Year of publication 2009 Kerb weight 886kg VIN from which rating applies applies to all iQs Seat tested Standard, cloth trim Class SUPERMINI Safety equipment Front seatbelt pretensioners Driver frontal airbag single stage Front passenger frontal airbag single stage Side body airbags Side head airbags Driver knee airbag Comments Adult occupant The passenger compartment remained stable during the frontal test. An airbag mounted under the steering wheel provides protection to the driver's knees and femurs. The passenger is restrained from forward movement by an underseat airbag as well by the conventional seatbelt. Both systems worked effectively, readings from the dummies' knees indicating good protection. Toyota showed that a similar level of protection would also be provided to occupants of different sizes and those sat in different positions. The car scored maximum points for protection of the passenger. In the pole test, rib deflections measured by the dummy led to the chest protection being rated as marginal. Marginal protection was provided against whiplash injuries. Child occupant In the first side barrier test, part of the ISOFIX attachment broke on the restraint containing the 3 year child. Toyota identified the problem as a change of material by Britax-Romer. Duo Plus child restraints ordered through Toyota dealers will now have an improved material specification. Toyota will contact the owners of all iQs and offer them a replacement restraint if they have already bought a Duo Plus for use in their car. On the basis of this action, Euro NCAP allowed a retest. In that re-test, Toyota's counter-measure proved effective and the child restraint remained properly attached to the ISOFIX anchorages. However, the head of the 3 year old was not contained by the side of the restraint and made contact with the seat of the 1½ year old. Britax-Roemer have improved the user's manual and labels of all Duo Plus child restraints to avoid the risk of adverse loading on the ISOFIX attachments as a result of incorrect child seat installation. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag did not meet Euro NCAP's requirements. However, there is a clear warning given of the dangers of using a rearward facing restraint in that position without first disabling the airbag. The presence of ISOFIX anchorages in the rear outboard seats is not clearly marked. Pedestrian The iQ scored maximum points for the protection offered to pedestrians' legs by the bumper. The bonnet provided mostly good protection in the areas likely to be struck by an adult's head but was predominantly poor for protection of a child's head. Safety assist Electronic stability control is standard equipment in all European countries. A seatbelt reminder system covering front and rear seats is also fitted as standard.





Crash Test 2009 Citroen C3 Picasso (Full Test) EuroNcap
Details of tested car Specifications Tested model Citroen C3 Picasso Confort HDi 90 Airdream, LHD Body type 5 door MPV Year of publication 2009 Kerb weight 1289kg VIN from which rating applies applies to all C3 Picassos Seat tested Standard, cloth trim Class SMALL MPV Safety equipment Front seatbelt pretensioners Double pretensioners Front seatbelt load limiters Driver frontal airbag single stage Front passenger frontal airbag single stage Side body airbags Side head airbags Comments Adult occupant The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Readings from the driver dummy's chest indicated a contact with the steering wheel and the car was penalised by one point. Protection of the knees, femurs and pelvis was good for both the driver and passenger. The car scored maximum points in side barrier impact. In the side pole test, protection of the chest was rated as marginal owing to the extent of rib deflection recorded by the dummy. Whiplash protection was poor, the seat scoring no points in two of the three dynamic tests and losing points for the poor position of the restraint when unadjusted (fully down and back). Child occupant Based only on the dummy responses in the tests, the car scored maximum points for protection of the 3 year infant. For the 1½ year old, Euro NCAP awards fewer points for a forward facing restraint than for a rearward facing one but the dummy readings were all good. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not sufficiently clear. The presence of ISOFIX anchorages in the rear outboard seats was not clearly marked. Pedestrian The car scored maximum points for the protection offered by the bumper. However, poor head protection was provided over most of the bonnet surface. Safety assist ESC is available on the C3 Picasso but it is not standard equipment on all variants. The star rating reflects a car without ESC as sales of the system are not expected to reach Euro NCAP's requirements. A driver-set speed limitation device is also available as standard or as an option. As Citroen expect to sell most vehicles with the limiter as standard equipment, its score has been included in the overall rating. The device allows drivers to set a speed to which the vehicle will then be limited. A seatbelt reminder is standard equipment for the driver's seat and standard or optional for the passenger and rear seats. Sales of the passenger SBR are expected to reach Euro NCAP's requirements; sales of the rear seat system will not. Therefore, the overall rating incorporates the scores from the driver and passenger systems.





Holden Astra Ad - 'Transformers' Style
New Holden Astra ad, with inspiration from Transformers.





Crash Test New Opel Astra 2010 Euro NCAP
Crash Test New Opel Astra 2010 Euro NCAP





► 2011 Opel Astra - CRASH TEST
Encore plus de vidéos sur http://www.youcarpress.com





2015 Volkswagen GTI small overlap IIHS crash test
2015 Volkswagen GTI small overlap 40 mph IIHS crash test Overall evaluation: Good Full rating at http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings/vehicle/v/volkswagen/gti/2015





Crash test Opel Corsa vs Mercedes
http://www.sicurauto.it - Crash test compatibilità Opel Corsa vs Mercedes. Approfondisci: http://www.sicurauto.it/crash-test-video/test-speciali/compatibilita-opel-c orsa-contro-mercedes-classe-s|video.htm





Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?




Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1991 Vauxhall Astra gte: 10.900 @ 127.000
robert (jay) johnston, Engine: 2.0 8v, Turbos: big one


1996 Opel Astra GSi: 12.860 @ 106.890
Kneet, Engine: C20LET, Supercharger: no Turbos: KKK K16 Tires: 225-45-16


1993 Opel Astra gsi: 14.530 @ 98.000
jassie1,


2008 Vauxhall Astra 1.9cdti: 15.015 @ 91.780
vinny, Engine: 1.9cdti with a dtuk box, Turbos: yes


1992 Opel Astra GSI: 15.020 @ 0.000
RedKiller,


2003 Vauxhall Astra GSi: 15.200 @ 94.010
NA,


2008 Saturn Astra : 16.610 @ 83.910
NA, Engine: DOHC 16 valve inline 4,


 


©2015 DragTimes - Disclaimer - Contact Us