Crash Test: Subaru Impreza

Go to MYRIDE.COM for more car videos. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Crash Test: Subaru Impreza.

More Videos...


2016 Toyota Hilux - Crash Test
Safety Sense (Assistance Systems) 00:00 Crash Test 00:33 Euro NCAP Frontal Impact takes place at 64 Km/h, 40% of the width of the car striking a deformable barrier. In the Full Width test, 100% of the width of the car the car impact a rigid barrier at 50 Km/h. In the side impact, a mobile deformable barrier impacts the driver's door at 50 km/h. In the pole test, the car tested is propelled sideways at 32 km/h into a rigid pole. interior New 2017 side AEB inter-Urban - Pedestrian "SUBSCRIBE NOW"





Smart Car Crash Test #TBT- Fifth Gear
It's #ThowbackThursday! the gang decide to crash test the Smart Car. With an NCAP rating of 3 out of 5 stars can the little compact withstand a 70mph crash into re-enforced concrete barriers? For more fantastic car reviews, shoot-outs and all your favourite Fifth Gear moments, subscribe to our Official Channel - https://www.youtube.com/user/fifthgearuk





2017 Subaru Impreza Vs 2016 Honda Civic Sedan Crash Tests
The Subaru Impreza was redesigned for the 2017 model year. Two small overlap frontal tests of the Impreza were conducted, one by the Institute and the other by Subaru as part of frontal crash test verification. Ratings are based on both tests, but the vehicle specifications shown below are based on the Institute’s test. Ratings apply to both the 4-door sedan and wagon versions of the Impreza. Structure The driver space was maintained well in both tests, with maximum intrusion of the lower interior of 7 cm at the footrest. Upper interior intrusion measured 2-4 cm at the upper hinge pillar and instrument panel. Injury measures In both tests, measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity. Restraints and dummy kinematics Dummy movement was well controlled in both tests. The dummy’s head loaded the frontal airbag, which stayed in front of the dummy until rebound. The side curtain airbag deployed and has sufficient forward coverage to protect the head from contact with side structure and outside objects. Tested vehicle specifications Tested vehicle 2017 Subaru Impreza 2.0i 4-door 4wd Weight 3,034 lbs. Side airbags front and rear head curtain airbags and front seat-mounted torso airbags Wheelbase 105 in. Length 182 in. Width 70 in. Engine 2.0 L 4-cylinder EPA ratings 28 mpg city / 38 mpg highway Honda Civic The Honda Civic was redesigned for the 2016 model year. Structure The driver space was maintained well, with maximum intrusion of the lower interior of 7 cm at the footrest. Upper interior intrusion measured 2 cm at the upper hinge pillar and instrument panel. Injury measures Forces on the dummy's head when it hit the steering wheel through the airbag indicate that head injuries would be possible in a crash of this severity. Measures indicate that injuries to the right lower leg also would be possible. Restraints and dummy kinematics The dummy’s movement was well controlled. The dummy’s head loaded the frontal airbag, which stayed in front of the dummy until rebound. The side curtain airbag deployed and has sufficient forward coverage to protect the head from contact with side structure and outside objects. The side torso airbag also deployed. Tested vehicle specifications Tested vehicle 2016 Honda Civic LX 4-door Weight 2,761 lbs. Side airbags front and rear head curtain airbags and front seat-mounted torso airbags Wheelbase 106 in. Length 182 in. Width 71 in. Engine 2.0 L 4-cylinder EPA ratings 31 mpg city / 41 mpg highway





2017 Land Rover Discovery - Crash Test
Comments - ADULT OCCUPANT The passenger compartment of the Discovery remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs for both the driver and passenger. Land Rover showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. There was insufficient pressure in the driver's airbag to prevent the head from 'bottoming out' against the steering wheel, and the car was penalised for this. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good apart from the chest, protection of which was adequate. Readings of chest compression in the rear passenger dummy indicated marginal protection for this body area, with good protection of all others. Dummy readings indicated good protection of all critical body regions in both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact. However, in the barrier test, the driver's door became unlatched and the car was penalised. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. However, a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated poor whiplash protection. The Discovery has, as standard, an autonomous emergency braking system. In tests of its low-speed functionality, the system performed well with impacts avoided up to 35km/h and the impact speed reduced up to 50km/h. Comments - CHILD OCCUPANT In the frontal offset test, protection of the neck of the 10 year dummy was rated as marginal, as was that of the chest of the 6 year dummy. Otherwise, protection was good or adequate. In the side barrier test, protection of both dummies was rated as good and maximum points were scored. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver and the system was rewarded. Most of the restraint types for which the Discovery is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the vehicle. Comments - PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was good or adequate at most test locations, with some poor results recorded along the front edge of the bonnet. The protection offered by pedestrians' legs by the bumper was good and maximum points were scored. Protection of the pelvis was mixed, with some good and some poor areas. The autonomous emergency braking system scored maximum points in Euro NCAP's tests of its pedestrian protection, with complete avoidance of the target up to 40km/h and adequate speed mitigation thereafter. Comments - SAFETY ASSIST Tests of the autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests of its functionality at highway speeds. A lane departure warning system is fitted as standard equipment, as is a driver-set speed limiter. A seatbelt reminder is standard equipment on all seating positions including, if fitted, the optional third row seats. Specifications Tested Model: Land Rover Discovery, 2.0 diesel HSE, RHD Body Type: - 5 door SUV Year Of Publication: 2017 Kerb Weight: 2390kg VIN From Which Rating Applies: - all of the specification tested Class: Large Off-Road Euro NCAP Frontal Impact takes place at 64 Km/h, 40% of the width of the car striking a deformable barrier. In the Full Width test, 100% of the width of the car impacts a rigid barrier at 50 Km/h. In the side impact, a mobile deformable barrier impacts the driver's door at 50 km/h. In the pole test, the car tested is propelled sideways at 32 km/h into a rigid pole. "interior New 2016 Drive Assistance Systems" "SUBSCRIBE NOW"




Follow