Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

Crash Test 2002 - Discontinue Hyundai XG 350 IIHS

Hyundai XG300/XG350 2001-05 models FRONTAL OFFSET TEST OVERALL EVALUATION: Good Structure/safety cage Injury measures Restraints/dummy kinematics Head/neck Chest Leg/foot, left Leg/foot, right Acceptable Good Good Good Acceptable Good Important: Frontal crash test ratings can be compared only among vehicles of similar weight. Test details: The Hyundai XG300 was introduced in the 2001 model year and renamed the XG350 for the 2002 model year because the engine size was increased. The XG350 was dropped after the 2005 model year, replaced by the Hyundai Azera. Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement was well controlled. During rebound, the dummy's head hit the B-pillar. Injury measures — Measures taken from the head, neck, chest, and left leg indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity. Forces on the right tibia and right foot indicate that injuries to the lower leg and foot would be possible. Head acceleration from the B-pillar hit was low.


 


More Videos...


Mini and microcar bumpers
IIHS news release • June 11, 2009 Mini and microcar bumpers allow pricey damage; none of the 7 tested rates good under new system ARLINGTON, VA — Urban drivers often pick mini and microcars because they're affordable, fuel efficient, and easy to park on city streets. Fender-benders are hazards of urban driving, and just one of them can add up to thousands of dollars in repair costs because the bumpers don't adequately protect vehicles from damage. None of the bumpers on 7 mini and microcars the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety recently tested earns the top rating of good, and just 1, the Smart Fortwo, is acceptable. Five out of the 7 earn poor ratings and 1 earns a marginal. Full text of news release: http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr061109.html





Tiburon vs. XG350
2005 Tiburon SE V6 vs. 2002 XG350





Hyundai Grandeur XG At Top Speed Internal 2
I found all of these Hyundai Videos online through various sites. I thought it would be nice to collect these vids for us all to see. Credit must go to those who originally put them together.





FUNNY hahahaha taking a 2003 hyundai sonata down the 1/4 mile
2003 sonata. 6cyl 2.7l auto 4speed. as a joke we took my friends moms sonata down the track. car seat was in the back on stock tires and everything. sonata ran a 16.97. almost took that rustang out. @ cecil dragway





TOP 10 WORST CRASH TESTS
Thanks For Watching! Make Sure You Leave A Like! And Make Sure You Subscribe To Me And Others! Twitter: https://twitter.com/rp01ful https://twitter.com/RP01fulYoutube RP01ful : http://www.youtube.com/user/RP01ful Mr Geoclay : http://www.youtube.com/user/MrGeoclay Hi!, It's Regan : http://www.youtube.com/channel/UClVzxtLAINUdDv-JIP7XB0A exL Aquas : http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbo0RvMR7MAfo4KOHlNDlyg Theawsomegamer: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZ-pj2aAST-0FMr96hsyrxg Make Sure You Like My friends Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/snapsaplenty





2001 Hyundai XG300
http://www.edmarksuperstore.com 1-888-632-2935 (stock #88547A)





Crash Test 2002 - 2007 Dodge Caravan / Chrysler Town & Country (Frontal Offset) IIHS
Dodge Grand Caravan 2002-07 models results also apply to: 2002-07 Chrysler Town & Country FRONTAL OFFSET TEST OVERALL EVALUATION: Acceptable Structure/safety cage Injury measures Restraints/dummy kinematics Head/neck Chest Leg/foot, left Leg/foot, right Acceptable Acceptable Good Acceptable Poor Good Important: Frontal crash test ratings can be compared only among vehicles of similar weight. Good Good Acceptable Acceptable Marginal Marginal Poor Poor Test details: The Dodge Grand Caravan and Chrysler Town and Country were redesigned for the 2001 model year. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of the Grand Caravan in three 40 mph frontal offset crash tests into deformable barriers. After the first test, DaimlerChrysler indicated the results were different from tests the company had conducted and requested a retest. Results of the second test were more consistent with company test results for structural performance, but the amount and pattern of intrusion were similar. More significantly, a fuel leak occurred, revealing a weakness in the design of a circular fitting where the fuel lines exit the fuel tank. Further examination of the fitting in the van tested first showed stress fractures in the same area as the leak in the second van. A third test was conducted after DaimlerChrysler made a design change to fix the fuel tank fitting and retrofitted a 2001 model with the redesign (all 2002 and later models include the modification). Examination of the redesigned fitting after the third test indicated no damage. Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement was well controlled in all three tests, except there was too much upward steering wheel movement in the second test. Injury measures — Measures taken from the neck and chest in all three tests indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity. A high acceleration occurred when the dummy's head hit the steering wheel through the airbag in the first and second tests, indicating that injuries to the head would be possible. Forces on the left femur indicate that injuries to the upper leg would be possible in the first and third tests. Forces on the right tibia and foot indicate that injuries to the lower leg and foot would be likely in all three tests.





Crash Test 2004 - 2007 Acura TL IIHS
Acura TL 2004-08 models FRONTAL OFFSET TEST OVERALL EVALUATION: Good Structure/safety cage Injury measures Restraints/dummy kinematics Head/neck Chest Leg/foot, left Leg/foot, right Good Good Good Good Good Good Important: Frontal crash test ratings can be compared only among vehicles of similar weight. Test details: The Acura TL was redesigned for the 2004 model year. Its base price has increased sufficiently to reclassify it as a midsize luxury car. (The 1999-2003 TL was classified as a midsize moderately priced car.) Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement was well controlled. After the dummy moved forward into the airbag, it rebounded into the seat without its head hitting any stiff structure that could cause injury. Injury measures — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.





Crash Test of 2004 - 2008 BMW 545 i IIHS (Frontal Impact)
BMW 5 series 2004-08 models FRONTAL OFFSET TEST OVERALL EVALUATION: Good Structure/safety cage Injury measures Restraints/dummy kinematics Head/neck Chest Leg/foot, left Leg/foot, right Good Good Good Good Acceptable Good Important: Frontal crash test ratings can be compared only among vehicles of similar weight. Test details: The BMW 5 series was redesigned for the 2004 model year. Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement well controlled. During rebound, the dummy's head hit the roof rail. Injury measures — Measures taken from the head, neck, chest, and left leg indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity. Forces on the right tibia indicate that injuries to the lower leg would be possible. Head acceleration from the roof rail hit was low.





Crash Test 2001 - 2006 Hyundai Santa Fe IIHS
Hyundai Santa Fe 2001-06 models mfg. after Mar. 2001 FRONTAL OFFSET TEST OVERALL EVALUATION: Good Structure/safety cage Injury measures Restraints/dummy kinematics Head/neck Chest Leg/foot, left Leg/foot, right Good Acceptable Good Good Acceptable Good Important: Frontal crash test ratings can be compared only among vehicles of similar weight. Test details: The Hyundai Santa Fe was introduced in the 2001 model year. All 2001 Santa Fe models manufactured after March 2, 2001 include a modified accelerator pedal intended to reduce right leg injury risk in frontal offset crashes. Beginning with 2002 models manufacturered after March 2002, they were equipped with standard side airbags for drivers' and front passengers' heads and chests (note: information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on or near the driver door). The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of a Santa Fe with the modified accelerator pedal in a 40 mph frontal offset crash test into a deformable barrier. The vehicle was retrofitted with the modified accelerator pedal before the crash test. A redesigned, larger Santa Fe was introduced in the 2007 model year. Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement was well controlled. During rebound, the dummy's head hit the B-pillar. Injury measures — Measures taken from the neck, chest, and left leg indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity. A high head acceleration occurred when the dummy's head hit the B-pillar, indicating that injuries to the head would be possible. Forces on the right tibia indicate that injuries to the lower leg would be possible.





Hyundai XG 250
Automerk: Hyundai Carrosserie: Sedan Bouwjaar: 05 - 2004 Conditie: Gebruikt Type(nummer): Hyundai XG 250 Brandstof: Benzine Kilometerstand: 80.000 - 90.000 Opties: ABS, Airbag dubbel, Airbag enkel, Airco, Automatische transmissie, Boordcomputer, Centr.vergrendeling, Cruise control, Elektr. buitenspiegels, Elektr. ramen v + a, Elektr.ramen voor, Parkeersensor, Radio & CD Kleur: Zilver Full option Afneembare trekhaak Gsi installatie met ringtank op plaats vh reservewiel 86881 Km Met onderhoudsboekje. --- Automatische transmissie, Boordcomputer, Centr.vergrendeling, Cruise control, Elektr. buitenspiegels, Elektr. ramen v + a, Getint glas, Lederen bekleding, Lichtmetalen velgen, Metallic lak, Parkeersensor, Radio & CD, Startonderbreker, Stuurbekrachtiging, Trekhaak Kleur: Zilver





1998 HYUNDAI GRANDEUR XG
HYUNDAI GRANDEUR XG COMMERCIAL





2015 Hyundai Sonata small overlap IIHS crash test
2015 Hyundai Sonata 40 mph small overlap IIHS crash test Overall evaluation: Acceptable Full rating at http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings/vehicle/v/hyundai/sonata/2015





Crash Test 2004 - 2008 (Discontinued) Chrysler Pacifica (Frontal Offset) IIHS
Chrysler Pacifica 2004-08 models FRONTAL OFFSET TEST OVERALL EVALUATION: Good Structure/safety cage Injury measures Restraints/dummy kinematics Head/neck Chest Leg/foot, left Leg/foot, right Acceptable Good Good Good Good Good Important: Frontal crash test ratings can be compared only among vehicles of similar weight. Test details: The Chrysler Pacifica was introduced in the 2004 model year. Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement was well controlled. After the dummy moved forward into the airbag, it rebounded into the seat without its head hitting any stiff structure that could cause injury. Injury measures — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.





Crash Test 2002 - 2008 Jaguar X-Type (Rear Pole & Angle Barrier Test) IIHS
5.mp.h into pole and barrier




Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?





Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1972 BMW 2002 : 8.580 @ 156.592
Tero.Laukkanen, Engine: 2.2l -16 valve, Turbos: Turbo.... Tires: M / T ET street


1967 BMW 2002 2.1 turbo: 12.250 @ 120.000
pentti pekola, Engine: 2.1 8valve, Turbos: modified holset 3 ld Tires: 245 street normal


1975 BMW 2002 : 14.008 @ 98.450
Arturo Martnez, Engine: 1990, Tires: Bridgtone 215X50X13 DOT


1975 BMW 2002 tii: 15.500 @ 95.000
Jose Martinez, Engine: 2002, Supercharger: no Turbos: no Tires: 205X50


1976 BMW 2002 : 17.466 @ 75.320
Zvonimir Kokorovic, Engine: M10 2.0L I4, Tires: 215 Sumitomo


 


©2014 DragTimes - Disclaimer