Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

05 Altima SER vs 94 Mustang Cobra

Fastima vs Cobra Cobra gave the altima the jump to try to catch up, but waited a little too long. lol CNM RACERS


 


More Videos...


Mustang leaving SVT Cobra Club - Parkway Ford Show 2013 (2 of 3)
12th Annual Carolina Regional SVT Cobra, Shelby, Boss, Mustang, and all Ford Show on August 24, 2013. Hosted by SVT Cobra Mustang Club (SCMC) and Parkway Ford in Winston-Salem, NC. For more info go svtcobraclub.com. Video is of various cars leaving the show area. Vid 1 of 3. Don't forget to check out my youtube channel to see Mustang videos!





Honda Civic Vs Viper
turboed Civic Vs Viper Nas





2012 Mustang V6 vs 2008 Altima 3.5 SE Coupe
2012 Mustang V6 - 6 speed manual stock vs 2008 Altima 3.5 SE Coupe - CVT w/ intake/Exhaust/tune





Altima vs Trans Am
ME vs my brothers TA. Close race, I only lost by .09 seconds.





Nissan Altima vs Subaru WRX STi Capital Raceway
title





Altima vs Dodge Charger R/T
My Altima 3.5 vs my wife's aunt in her 06 Charger R/T 5spd autos in both cars. Charger was stock, my car as intake, Exhaust, Y pipe, and VIAS delete plate. Was not my best time on the day but a good heads up race. Here is a link to another 2006 Charger R/T 1/8th mile racing. Ran 9.87 @ 74.xx mph. So stop telling me my aunts Hemi is a V6 PLEASE. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5B8Nk3zI1jo





Altima vs Roush Mustang
My Altima 3.5 5AT with intake, catback, Y pipe, and VIAS delete vs a stage 2 Roush Mustang 5spd with Stage 3 Supercharger @ 5psi. I lost but was happy with how close I was :-).





2014 and 2015 Nissan Altima Detailed Review and Road Test
Check out my other videos! http://vid.io/xqoB Who is Alex? Find out here! http://vid.io/xqoF The "family sedan" may not be very exciting, but without midsized sales auto makers would be in a pickle. Ponder this: the five best-selling midsized sedans in America accounted for 1.3 million of the 12.8 million vehicles sold in 2011. With numbers like that, it's important to get your mass-market people mover right. This means competitive fuel economy, a low base price and swipe as much tech from your luxury brand as possible. Either that or just wear a Nissan badge on the front. Say what? The last generation Altima was the second best-selling car despite being long in the tooth and filled with some questionable plastics. This Altima has a tougher task however, it needs to compete with Honda's new Accord and Ford's sexy Fusion which is selling like hot cakes. Can Nissan's traditional value proposition make up the difference? Or does the Altima have something else up its sleeve? A design that doesn't alienate the customer you expect to return and buy their second or third car is critical. Just ask Ford how that bubble-Taurus redesign went in 1996. Still, midsize sedan shoppers demand some style so Nissan's design team jammed a bit of Maxima, a pinch of Infiniti M and a "whole-lotta" Versa into a sausage press and cut the Altima off at 191.5 inches. This makes the new Altima longer than a Camry, a hair longer than a Maxima and essentially the same size as the Accord and Fusion. Nobody will confuse the Altima with an Aston Martin, nor will they think their neighbor is driving a budget Bentley. Instead the slab-sided Altima delivers clean lines and elegant good looks. Think of it as the Midwestern farm girl to the Fusion's Los Angeles call girl. Since our tester was the top-of-the-line SL, the cockpit featured a heated tilt/telescopic steering wheel, an 8-way power driver's seat and manually adjustable lumbar support. Shoppers that chose the 3.5L V6 will be treated to a pair of the best looking and best feeling magnesium paddle shifters this side of a BMW M6. Seriously. There's just one problem: paddle shifters on a car with a CVT make as much sense as a parking brake on a french poodle. (Yet for some reason I found myself caressing their magnesium goodness non-stop when I was behind the wheel.) Like the most entries in this segment, the front passenger seat remains manually adjustable regardless of trim level and upholstery. Thanks to Nissan's "Zero Gravity" seat design, the front seats proved comfortable and didn't' aggravate my temperamental knee during a 2 hour road trip. Since manufacturers "march to their own drummer" when measuring legroom, take your family to the dealer and jam them all in the car before making a purchase. The crash diet and CVT pay dividends at the pump. The Altima 2.5 manages 27/38/31 MPG (City/Highway/Combined) and does so without direct injection, start/stop, batteries or aero packages. What about that V6? Nissan's focus on weight has made the Altima 3.5 lighter than the Accord V6 and Fusion 2.0 EcoBoost by over 200lbs. In our 3.5 SL I averaged an impressive 27.6MPG over a week of mixed driving. This is notably above the 25MPG combined EPA score despite my commute and the 2,200ft mountain pass I cross twice a day. You can thank the light curb weight and CVT for that. The Accord V6 matches the Altima's combined EPA number and the Fusion trumps it by one MPG on paper. In the real world, the Altima beat both by 4MPG. When the road curves, a light chassis will only get you so far, thankfully Nissan tuned the Altima's suspension to be compliant but surprisingly agile. Adding to the fun-factor, all V6 models are shod with 235/45R18 rubber, notably wider than the V6 Camry's standard 215 or optional 225 tires. The suspension, curb weight and tires combine to give the Altima a slightly higher road holding score than the Fusion 2.0 EcoBoost we got our hands on, but numbers aren't everything. The Fusion's steering may be numb, but it manages more feeling than the Altima and even I have to admit the CVT sucks the fun out of aggressive driving. If that matters to you, drive past the Nissan dealer and pick up a Fusion 2.0T with or without AWD. Some may call this a cop-out, but in my book the Accord, Fusion and Altima tie for first place in my mind. Here's why: each of this trio plays to a different audience. The Fusion is gorgeous, more dynamic than the Altima but has stumbled with the 1.6L EcoBoost quality issues. The Accord is a traditional choice with a solid reputation and greater visibility thanks to an enormous greenhouse. Meanwhile the new Altima is a stylish elegant sedan with a powerful and seriously efficient V6. If I were dropping my own money on a sedan in this category I would have a hard time choosing between the Altima 3.5 SL and a Fusion 2.0 EcoBoost.





2013 Ford Fusion vs Nissan Altima 0-60 MPH Mile High Matchup Review
( http://www.TFLcar.com ) The new 2013 Ford Fusion and the new 2013 Nissan Altima directly compete for the same car buyer. They are both four door mid-sized family sedans that have gotten bigger for 2013. They both get the exact same EPA MPG but that is where the similarities end. The Fusion we tested has a turbo-charged ecoBoost 4 cylinder engine mated to a traditional 6-speed transmission and all-wheel-drive. While the Nissan Altima gets a bigger 6-cylinder mated to a CVT transmission. In another fun and informative 0-60 MPH TFLcar review, we compare both cars to see not only which one is faster but which one it the better buy.





2013 Nissan Altima | New Car Review | on Everyman Driver
2013 Nissan Altima 2.5 SV Review on Everyman Driver with Dave Erickson. Please visit http://www.everymandriver.com/ Support the EMD Team with a $20 Gas Card via Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=X3FUPM RHFUCTU Subscribe now to receive new Everyman Driver videos in your feed: http://tinyurl.com/cy4feab Subscribe now to receive new Everywoman Driver videos in your feed: http://tinyurl.com/mmug55o Subscribe now to receive new Everyman Driver News Channel videos in your feed: http://tinyurl.com/mud34b9 For more free car review videos from the Everywoman Driver visit: http://www.everywomandriver.com/ Like Everyman Driver on Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/bnys8za Follow Everyman Driver on Twitter: http://tinyurl.com/d3wo42l Dave Erickson is a Multi-Media Producer, Freelance Reporter, Videographer, Podcaster and Host. Before Everyman Driver, Dave spent 15 years working as a TV News Anchor and Reporter. Learn more at http://www.daveericksonmedia.com/





2013 Mustang 5.0 VS Altima V6 Quick Highway Pull
Got a quick pull in before hitting traffic. He wanted to get brave but im not into that hahaha. maybe we'll get em next time.





02 Maxima vs Mustang GT
mods for maxima: intake, block off plate (autotragic)





2013 Nissan Altima 2.5SL Review, Walkaround, Exhaust, & Test Drive
As the best-selling and most important model in Nissan's lineup, the all-new fifth generation Altima sedan continues to move up the mid-size family sedan ladder with improved fuel-efficiency, refinement, technology, and space. It's a top-pick in a segment crowded with excellent offerings, only a lack of a manual transmission and somewhat deja-vu styling may have other buyers looking elsewhere.





Altima vs SRT-4
Just me in my altima with I/E vs a random SRT-4 at the track. It was a good heads up race with me winning. Times where neon 9.64@ 77.78 and my altima ran 9.44 @ 76.25.





2007-2012 Nissan Altima Cabin Air Filter Replacement
How to replace your cabin air filter in a 2007-2012 Nissan Altima. You'll need a philips head screw driver for this project. In order to access the filter you have to remove the glove box. Once removed you can access the filter.




Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?





Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1969 Ford Mustang : 6.860 @ 204.000
Bill Sexton, Engine: 712ci Pontiac built by Sonny Leonard,


1969 Ford Mustang : 7.170 @ 177.000
CARL EPPLE, Engine: 572CI SVO 460, Tires: 33X10.5W MICKY THOMP


1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1: 7.670 @ 178.210
Phil Manquen - Walt Drakeford, Engine: 602 CI, Tires: 10.5


1987 Ford Mustang Turbo: 7.816 @ 180.800
Brad, Engine: 347CI, Turbos: Precision 98.5mm Tires: 28 x 10.5 MTs


1995 Ford Mustang Cobra: 7.889 @ 197.360
Jim Mills, Engine: 427 Windsor, Turbos: Twin GT47-88 Tires: M/T 325/50/15 Radials


2007 Ford Mustang Super GT500 Twin Turbo: 7.890 @ 175.220
EV, Engine: Built 5.4L Aluminum Engine, Turbos: Twin 67mm Precision Turbos


1989 Ford Mustang lx: 7.930 @ 172.300
jorge fretts, Engine: 598, Tires: 33x10.5w


1989 Ford Mustang LX Hatchback 10.5 tire: 8.000 @ 170.000
Marshall Hancock, Engine: 572 ci, Supercharger: n/a Turbos: n/a Tires: M/T


1986 Ford Mustang THE STAMPEEDE BANDIT: 8.013 @ 170.033
Larry Gotreaux, Engine: BBF-ELIMINATOR-460-605ci, by Tims Engines, Denham Springs,, Supercharger: N/A Turbos: N/A Tires: 27x15 GY & 33.5x17x15W-GY-D1


1993 Ford Mustang LX: 8.390 @ 167.870
Lee Howie, Engine: Bennett, Turbos: 1 Precision PT90 Tires: DOT


1987 Ford Mustang coupe: 8.400 @ 162.370
Todd, Engine: 385ci,


1989 Ford Mustang coupe: 8.420 @ 167.000
Ryan Ellington, Engine: sbc 434, Tires: mt 275/60/15 drag radial


1991 Ford Mustang GT: 8.520 @ 172.700
PRO LARRY, Engine: 351W, Supercharger: NA Turbos: NA Tires: NA


1990 Ford Mustang GT: 8.527 @ 172.300
PRO LARRY AND BRANDON G.T, Engine: 351W, Tires: 10.5 SLICK'S


1993 Ford Mustang Cobra 363 Nitrous: 8.541 @ 152.870
CJ Williams, Engine: 363,


2006 Ford Mustang GT: 8.579 @ 158.780
Paul Fercho, Engine: 572 CID big block ford, Supercharger: none Turbos: none Tires: M/T 29.5X10.5WX15 Slicks


1985 Ford Mustang lx: 8.600 @ 159.000
mike pritchard, Engine: 537ci, Tires: 30x13.50 et streets


1990 Ford Mustang LX Coupe: 8.780 @ 154.000
Clint Lynch, Engine: 418 windsor, Tires: 28x10.5


1991 Ford Mustang Turbo: 8.800 @ 161.000
Mike, Engine: 306CI, Turbos: Air Research 91mm Tires: 28X13.5X15 ET STREETS.


1985 Ford Mustang GT coupe: 8.860 @ 154.000
James Cudse, Engine: 358 W, Supercharger: Paxton Novi 2000 Tires: skinnies, Hoosier 14.5x28


 


©2014 DragTimes - Disclaimer