Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

Ford Ranger vs Toyota Hilux

The new Ford Ranger takes on the king of the bakkies - the Toyota Hilux


 


More Videos...


OFF ROAD-Megatest: Ford Ranger, Isuzu D-Max, Nissan Navara, VW Amarok
Wir testen den neuen Ford Ranger und Isuzu D-Max gegen die beliebte Konkurrenz von Nissan und Volkswagen. Den ausführlichen Vergleich zum Making-of-Video gibt's in der OFF ROAD 4/2013, die ab dem 12. März im Zeitschriftenhandel ausliegt. Den Test und die Fotoproduktion haben wir im Offroad-Park Langenaltheim produziert. Leider war das Wetter und die Streckenverhältnisse zum Zeitpunkt der Videoaufnahmen deutlich schlechter als das am Vortag bei den Tests der Fall war -- das kann man am Kontrast der Wetterbedingungen Video/Fotos gut sehen. Jetzt wünschen wir euch aber viel Spaß beim Reinziehen!





Crash Test Ford Ranger 2012 VS Toyota Hilux Vigo
Crash Test Ford Ranger 2012 VS Toyota Hilux Vigo





New Ford Ranger Gets Stuck - Terry's Views Part 7
Towbar strikes again! Register now to start voting for Terry at www.fordrangerchallenge.com.au .Apologies for the lower quality video I had problems editing.





Ford Ranger im Test: Offroad ein echter Kerl
Endlich -- werden sich die deutschen Ranger-Fans denken -- ist es vorbei mit der biederen Optik des Pick-ups von Ford. Beim neuen Ranger sieht man nun die Verwandtschaft zu den größeren "F"-Modellen, die in den USA die meistverkaufte Pick-up-Baureihe darstellt. Unser Testfahrer Christian Jehle hat den neuen Konkurrenten von Amarok und Co im Offroad-Park Langenaltheim auf Herz und Nieren getestet. Den detaillierten Testbericht gibt es unter http://www.auto-news.de/test/einzeltest/anzeige_Onroad-wie-Offroad-ein-echt er-Kerl-Der-neue-Ford-Ranger_id_32000





Dual Cab 4x4 of the Year Award - Rob Fraser Reviews
myrv.com.au 4x4 Dual Cab of the Year Award Introducing the best Dual Cab utes in a no holds barred shootout.Representing the pinnacle of Diesel performance. Which is the total performance package, which sets a new benchmark. For more information please visit myrv.com.au





La Nueva Ford Ranger 2012 contra el mundo
Compilado de las pruebas realizadas de dos ingenieros de Ford Australia donde testean la Nueva Ford Ranger en diferentes exigencias y superficies. Toda la info sobre la Nueva Ranger en http://www.16valvulas.com.ar/nueva-ford-ranger-versiones-equipamiento-preci os-y-colores/ Leer mas sobre el video en http://www.16valvulas.com.ar/video-nueva-ford-ranger-2012-prueba-en-todo-ti po-de-terreno/





4x4 tug of war Ford Ranger vs VW Amarok
This video is just for fun and i'd say the result is only down to the drivers.





All new Ranger พี่เปี๊ยกสุดยอด
สุดๆๆ





Desafio Ranger
Prueba de la nueva Ford Ranger en Expoagro 2012





2012 Ford Ranger T6 EuroNCAP Crash Tests (Frontal, Side, & Pole Impacts)
Five Stars Adult occupant The passenger compartment of the Ranger remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings in the tests indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and front passenger. Ford showed that a similar level of protection would be provided for occupants of different sizes and those sat in different seating positions. For the passenger, all body regions were well protected. For the driver, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good. Maximum points were scored in the side barrier test, with good protection of all body areas. In the more severe side pole test, chest protection was adequate and that of other body regions was good. The front seats and head restraints provided marginal protection against whiplash injuries in a rear-end impact. Child occupant Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained in the protective shells of their restraints, minimsing the risk of dangerous head contacts. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. Pedestrian The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs. The front edge of the bonnet was more mixed, with good areas and some areas which gave poor protection to struck pedestrians. However, in the areas likely to be struck by a child's head, the bonnet provided almost entirely good protection and was predominantly good in the areas likely to be struck by an adult's head. Safety assist Electronic stability control is standard equipment on all variants of the Ranger and met Euro NCAP's test requirements. A seatbelt reminder is provided for the driver and front passenger seats. A speed limitation device is not available.





All New FORD RANGER Overview #3 Sustainability
Full Presentation, Test Drive and Road Trip of ALL NEW FORD RANGER by Ford Asia Pacific & Australia in Chiang Rai Thailand 10 November 2011. For more info articles and photos, please visit: http://stephenlangitan.com/





Ford Ranger pick-up review - CarBuyer
Ford Ranger pick-up 2014 review: http://bit.ly/1klWpZV Subscribe to the Carbuyer YouTube channel: http://bit.ly/17k4fct Subscribe to Auto Express: http://subscribe.autoexpress.co.uk/cb The Ford Ranger is now in its third generation and this latest model is designed to offer the most car-like driving experience yet, without compromising the Ranger's load-carrying or off-road abilities. There are plenty of body style choices, a good choice of engines and the Ranger even looks pretty good too. Subscribe to Auto Express magazine and get 6 issues for £1 plus a free gift: http://subscribe.autoexpress.co.uk/cb





ford vs toyota
2004 ford ranger vs 2010 Toyota Tacoma





Volkswagen Amarok pick-up review - CarBuyer
Volkswagen Amarok 2014 review: http://bit.ly/1lKCVcF Subscribe to the Carbuyer YouTube channel: http://bit.ly/17k4fct Subscribe to Auto Express: http://subscribe.autoexpress.co.uk/cb The Volkswagen Amarok brings the firm's unbeatable image and peerless quality to the double-cab pick-up market. It benefits from the same company car tax breaks as any other contender in this class, but has just as much appeal as a family car as it does as a commercial vehicle. This is mainly down to the space and quality on offer inside. The Amarok is sold only as a double-cab five-seater for now -- a single-cab model will follow later -- and it stands out with its high-grade materials and solid build quality. As the styling suggests, this car is virtually unstoppable away from the beaten track. The 2.0-litre twin-turbo diesel engine comes with a choice of 120bhp or 161bhp outputs, while there are Startline, Trendline and Highline specs. All feature four-wheel drive, to ensure the car can take the roughest terrain in its stride. Massive dimensions make parking a challenge, but once you've got used to how big it feels from behind the wheel, the Amarok is a great deal of fun. Subscribe to Auto Express magazine and get 6 issues for £1 plus a free gift: http://subscribe.autoexpress.co.uk/cb





Chevy vs. Ford HD Truck - Bed Bend Video
Watch a video that shows the difference in bed and frame twist strength in the new Chevy and Ford HD pickup trucks.for




Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?





Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

2003 Ford Ranger Full Tube Chassis: 7.414 @ 183.980
Don Nase Jr, Engine: 2.3 Liter, Turbos: Single


1983 Ford Ranger short wheelbase: 9.690 @ 119.000
Robert, Engine: 408, Tires: 11.00


1984 Ford Ranger : 9.710 @ 136.000
, Engine: 331,


1987 Ford Ranger : 9.943 @ 132.520
Jay Taylor, Engine: 351 Windsor, Supercharger: Nope Turbos: Nope Tires: Mickey Thompson ET Drags


1989 Ford Ranger : 9.980 @ 135.480
Roughcut Racing Ranger, Engine: 408 Windsor (All Motor), Supercharger: Nope Turbos: Nope Tires: 31*12.5*15 MT rear / Hooiser 26/3.5 Front


1984 Ford Ranger xl: 10.572 @ 120.400
Ron Graham, Engine: 347, Tires: Hoosier


1998 Ford Ranger : 10.790 @ 124.000
Kevin Ouellette, Engine: ford 347, Supercharger: no Turbos: no Tires: Mickey thompson 29.5 x 10.5


1983 Ford Ranger : 10.873 @ 125.030
Jeff Whitaker, Engine: 347, Supercharger: weiand 174 Tires: M/T Drag Radials


1984 Ford Ranger : 11.000 @ 121.000
Richard Novak, Engine: 466 Big Block Ford, Tires: Hoosier QuickTime Pro


1984 Ford Ranger Long Bed: 11.055 @ 121.000
Mark, Engine: 501, Tires: Et Streets


1989 Ford Ranger : 11.125 @ 118.930
Darin Johnson, Engine: 351 Windsor, Tires: 31x16.5 et streets


1984 Ford Ranger : 11.380 @ 116.770
Mike Georgelin, Engine: 89 5.0L,


1992 Ford Ranger : 11.620 @ 112.000
nathan, Engine: 302, Tires: mickey street radial drags


1998 Ford Ranger : 12.065 @ 114.830
Jess Warren, Engine: 2.5 block, Supercharger: No Turbos: Holset hx35 Tires: Slicks


1993 Ford Ranger : 12.400 @ 108.000
lofgren, Engine: 302, 0 0 Tires: 11.5 x 15 slick


1995 Ford Ranger : 12.510 @ 101.650
Steven Meyer, Engine: 302 ci, Tires: Drag Radial


1986 Ford Ranger : 12.810 @ 107.000
John, Engine: dodge 360, Tires: slick


1985 Ford Ranger shortbed: 12.955 @ 110.010
Ian Olson, Engine: 289 V8, Tires: 245/45/R17 Cooper Zeon 2XS


1987 Ford Ranger Cobra: 13.170 @ 102.460
Cody, Engine: 93' Cobra 302ci, Tires: BFG Radial T/A's


1987 Ford Ranger : 14.309 @ 95.320
David MacBeth, Engine: 289, Tires: BFG's


 


©2014 DragTimes - Disclaimer