Met Police - "I don't need to know" (just following orders) - March 26

New video in HD = "Oh for fuck sake not you again" - -- Relevant Legislation -- Section 3, Criminal Justice Act 2003 Section 174, Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 Part 2, Other repeals and revocations

More Videos...

Met Undercover Snatch and Grab Squad at Soho Square - April 29, 2011 + Full Video: FIT Officers = PC Glen Williams and Photographer 4674 - UK Uncut "Trial of the century...NHS vs The Banks" At Soho Square on May 28th @ 1pm. Facebook Event - UK Uncut website event - Video footage given to the BBC for their use. My comments below are not supported nor endoresed by the BBC. The comments below are my own. I was on my way to deliver this footage to the BBC in Regent Street when I was detained under section 60. I had started recording on my camera before the police approached me and they forced the camera from my hand and held both my arms as if I was a criminal. I was asked for my details but refused to give any until I had been told what law and what crime I had committed. The officers could not tell me what crime but were only able to use Section 60 which is a stop and search power. Everyone has the right not to give their details during a search. They then asked me if my bank card which they took from my pocket belonged to me. I told them that it did and they arrested me for Suspicion of Handling Stolen Goods. (The card belonged to me). Before my arrest I had arranged to give my footage to the BBC and a BBC reporter booked my name with reception. I was followed from Soho by two police officers in uniform. I was detained and arrested on Regent Street close to the BBC building. I found it strange how they would decide to detain me before I could get to the BBC. After I was released without Charge and without Caution after 4 hours I promptly made my way back to the BBC in Regent Street and was finally able to pass them this footage. I also want to point out that many people have been arrested over the last two days including Charlie Veitch who is well known for hugging the police (Love Police) who was arrested yesterday. No one knows exactly what he was arrested for but the footage I have just seen on the BBC of a play right being arrested along with another man who was wearing fancy costume. Apparently its illegal to wear fancy costume when the royal family are doing something. "Marksmen from the Met's specialist CO19 firearms unit are understood to be on a 'shoot to kill' footing and special forces are expected to infiltrate the crowds." Read more: wedding-protests#ixzz1LFwEr8PK

Cop busts biker AGAIN
The cops pulled me over yesterday for "gesticulation whilst in charge of a motorcycle". Bet you've never heard of *that* offence! --- He was wrong about the number plate and didn't know the law I've since found out. A lot of them don't! Certain imported vehicles may be permitted to display number plates with smaller characters if: The vehicle does not have European Community Whole Vehicle Type Approval AND The vehicle's construction/design cannot accommodate standard size number plates Specifications for smaller sized plates (for certain imported vehicles) ALL KTM's for instance are imported... (it would ONLY be the British makes for bikes actually MADE here that would NOT be imported...) and "can't accommodate" means: By virtue of both size, available space and main intended use.. (I.E. off road/racing...) where a standard plate would be quickly damaged by virtue of it's required positioning and the available space at that location. Guide for size and layout is: Character Height 64mm Character Width 44mm Character Stroke 10mm Space between characters 10mm Note: I.E. if the bike is imported and note made in the UK then you can have a smaller plate. The guide is that this would be the accepted size for characters that can be easily read at 20.5 meters.. although the characters can be smaller IF they can still be easily read at 20.5 meters.

Met Police harass photographer at Palestinian Nakba - May 15 + "Now take a look at this cheeky bugger, this police officer Bully #2 badge TX 465 came to the rescue of his colleague officer TX 507 who was clearly loosing the battle whom we saw in the earlier photo. It was TX 465 we caught on video, he gladly shut up and walked back onto the road when i refused to move. This is when i took a picture of him. So he was arguing with me that i was blocking the pavement, i was clearly standing against the wall with all 3 of them surrounding me. I told them to go over to the other side where they will find plenty more people blocking the pavement. I was merely standing next to a man in a wheelchair but he insisted i move. So what did i do? I moved three steps to the right and told him i moved. He then told me to stop being "Pedantic". So we argued a bit more, I asked him whether he will arrest me, he said no, instead he said he will escort me. Escort me where? So i told him i wasn't going to move and i challenged him to do whatever he was going to do. So he stopped for a while and didn't say anything. This is when James Newman came along with his video camera after seeing the confrontation i was having. (He also helped me earlier with another altercation in the day with another set of police officers.) So we both stood there refusing to move, this is when they decided to back off because everything was being recorded and what they were infact doing was harassing us. The video link is posted below. Something i've learnt.. that is to always stand up for yourself, it only takes common sense to know what is right and what is wrong. James said to the officers that he knew the law which helped fend them off, at this point the officers knew if they got into any further discussions they could be in trouble. Smiling for the camera isn't going to help, officer TX 465 you lost this one! Notice his chum TX 507 was listening attentively." By Khalid Malik 957.1674784747&type=1&theater#!/photo.php?fbid=1588895257013&set=a.15888756 16522.67957.1674784747&type=1&theater&pid=1089681&id=1674784747

Art - Part 3 - Police and details again
WARNING - Do NOT try this at home, UNLESS you are willing to be arrested. As some of you know, I was arrested, locked up, finger printed and even charged and end up in a very rigged game. in February for basically refusing to give my details. I learned a lot from it but some of you may not fancy such an education. Its easy to get into an ego battle with them about this. Instead, I try and stay centred and keep asking questions although its not easy as you can see here. Watch the way they respond to my question 'am I obliged to give you my details?'.....Notice they ask me why I am not giving them my details ? If I was asked that again, I would repsond with 'Am I obliged to justify myself as to why i dont want to give my details?!!' Also, the idea that if someone is alarmed harrassed or distressed that she can arrest me is in my understanding a load of nonsense. It depends on what I was doing and saying not purely on whether someone is alarmed ! Oh and by the way, here is part of the wording of section 5 which I think she forgot and many officers dont seem to remember... (4)A constable may arrest a person without warrant if— (a)he engages in offensive conduct which [F2a] constable warns him to stop, and (b)he engages in further offensive conduct immediately or shortly after the warning.