► 2013 Hyundai i30 CRASH TEST

http://www.youcar.tv The passenger compartment of the i30 remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Hyundai showed that a similar level of protection would be provided for occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was weak. The seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. Based on dummy results in the dynamic tests, the i30 scored maximum points for its protection of both the 18 month infant and the 3 year old child. In the frontal impact, forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising he likelihood of contact with parts of the car's interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled by means of a switch, allowing a rearward facing child restraint to be used in the passenger seat. The system provided clear information to the driver regarding the status of the airbag. There were clear warnings of the dangers of using a reaward facing restraint in that seating position without having deactivated the airbag. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians and the car scored maximum points in this area. The front edge of the bonnet provided predominantly good protection. In most areas where a child's head might strike, the bonnet provided good protection but the protection of an adult's head was mixed.

More Videos...


2017 Hyundai i30 - Crash test
2017-2018 Hyundai i30 Crash Test Review ADULT OCCUPANT Comments The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset impact. Dummy readings from the driver's knee indicated adequate protection. Structures in the dashboard presented a risk of injury to the driver and passenger and protection of the knee/femur/pelvis area was downgraded to marginal. Otherwise, protection of both dummies was good or adequate. In the full-width rigid-barrier test, and also in the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was at least adequate. In the more severe side pole impact, dummy measurements of chest deformation indicated marginal protection for that part of the body. Tests on the front seats and head restraints indicated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection there. The i30 has, as standard, an autonomous emergency braking system. Tests of the system at the low speeds typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries are caused, showed good performance. CHILD OCCUPANT Comments In the frontal offset test, protection of the 10 year dummy was good or adequate. Dummy readings of chest deceleration in the 6 year dummy indicated marginal protection. In the side barrier test, both dummies were well protected and maximum points were scored. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraints for which the i30 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION AEB Pedestrian Comments The bonnet surface provided good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian but performance was weak and poor in tests around the windscreen pillars. The protection provided to pedestrians' legs by the bumper was good at all test locations. Protection of the pelvis was also predominantly good. An autonomous emergency braking system which detects pedestrians is available as an option but was not assessed as part of this rating as it is not standard equipment. SAFETY ASSIST Comments The autonomous emergency braking system performed adequately in tests of its functionality at highway speeds. A seatbelt reminder is standard for the front and rear seats. A driver-set speed limitation device and a lane departure warning system are also both standard fit. "Elantra GT interior 2016 Driver Assistance systems" "SUBSCRIBE NOW"





Car Crash & Accidents Tests - Chevrolet Nissan Mazda Fiat & More
Videos of car crash and accidents tests related to Chevrolet Volt, Mini Cooper, Fiat 500, Nissan Juke and Leaf, Mazda 5. Chevrolet Volt - 2014 TOP SAFETY PICK +, Small overlap crash test rating: ACCEPTABLE; Mini Cooper Countryman - 2014 TOP SAFETY PICK, Small overlap crash test rating: GOOD; Fiat 500L, Small overlap crash test rating: POOR; Nissan Juke, Small overlap crash test rating: POOR; Nissan Leaf, Small overlap crash test rating: MARGINAL; Mazda 5, Small overalp crash test rating: POOR; Mazda 5 - Side impact test with deformable barrier moving 31 mph, Side test rating: MARGINAL, The Mazda 5 is the only 2014 model car to earn anything less than acceptable in the side test





Livsfara: Styrningen på Hyundai i30 dör
I Teknikens Världs undermanöverprov älgtestet dör styrservon på Hyundai i30 vilket är livsfarligt. Läs mer om hur det gick till på http://bit.ly/Hyundai-i30-farlig





Top 10 Worst Vehicle Crash Tests
Top 10 Worst Performing Vehicles in Crash Testing




Follow