Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

► 2013 Hyundai i30 CRASH TEST

http://www.youcar.tv The passenger compartment of the i30 remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Hyundai showed that a similar level of protection would be provided for occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was weak. The seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. Based on dummy results in the dynamic tests, the i30 scored maximum points for its protection of both the 18 month infant and the 3 year old child. In the frontal impact, forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising he likelihood of contact with parts of the car's interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled by means of a switch, allowing a rearward facing child restraint to be used in the passenger seat. The system provided clear information to the driver regarding the status of the airbag. There were clear warnings of the dangers of using a reaward facing restraint in that seating position without having deactivated the airbag. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians and the car scored maximum points in this area. The front edge of the bonnet provided predominantly good protection. In most areas where a child's head might strike, the bonnet provided good protection but the protection of an adult's head was mixed.


 


More Videos...


► 2012 BMW 3 Series CRASH TEST
► http://www.facebook.com/youcarpress The passenger compartment of the 3 Series remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. BMW showed that a similar level of protection would be provided for occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, all body regions were well protected and the car scored maximum points. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest and abdomen was adequate and that of the head and pelvis was good. The seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. Based on dummy restults in the dynamic tests, the 3 Series scored maximum points for its protection of the 18 month infant, and lost only a fraction of a point for protection of the 3 year old. In the frontal impact, forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of contact with parts of the car's interior. A switch is available as an option to deactivate the passenger airbag, allowing a rearward facing child restraint to be used in the passenger seat. This was not assessed as it is not standard equipment. There were clear warnings of the dangers of using a rearward facing restraint in that seating position without having deactivated the airbag. Both the bumper and the front edge of the bonnet provided good protection to pedestrians and the car scored maximum points in these areas. In almost all areas where a child's head might strike, the bonnet provided good protection but was predominantly poor in those areas likely to be struck by an adult's head.





► Renault Alpine A110-50 Proto - TRAILER
► http://www.youcar.tv Design clip where the concept car Renault Alpine A110-50 meets Renault Alpine A110.





► 2013 Mazda CX-5 CRASH TEST
► http://www.youcar.tv The passenger compartment of the CX-5 remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Mazda showed that a similar level of protection would be provided for occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, protection of all body regions was good and the car scored maximum points. Even in the more severe side pole test, the driver was well protected in all areas and maximum points were scored. The seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. Based on dummy readings in the dynamic tests, the CX-5 scored maximum points for its protection of the 3 year child and lost only a fraction of a point for protection of the 18 month infant. In the frontal impact, forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of contact with parts of the car's interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled by means of a switch, allowing a rearward facing child restraint to be used in the passenger seat. Clear information is provided regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. There were clear warnings of the dangers of using a reaward facing restraint in that seating position without having first deactivated the airbag. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians and the car scored maximum points in this area. The front edge of the bonnet was at best marginal in the protection offered to pedestrians. In most areas where it might be struck by the head of a child or an adult, the bonnet provided good protection.





2012 Hyundai i40 CRASH TEST
The passenger compartment of the i40 remained stable in the frontal impact. A driver knee airbag is standard equipment and dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees, femurs and pelvis for both front seat occupants. The steering column was considered a potential risk but Hyundai demonstrated that other parts of the facia offered good protection. The i40 scored maximum points in the side barrier test and provided adequate chest protection in the more severe side pole impact. The seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive and both the 3 year and the 18 month dummies were properly contained in the side impact test. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position and the i40 provides clear information to the driver regarding the status of the airbag. A permanently attached label gives a clear warning of the dangers of using a rearward facing seat in the passenger seat without first disabling the airbag.





Hyundai i30 1,6l GDi explicit video 2 of 4
For comments, more details, pictures and videos: http://www.turatii.ro





Hyundai i30 Engine and Interior





Тест-драйв Hyundai i30
место проживание и Коментарии тут http://zenkevich.ru/ правообладатель http://www.utro-russia.ru/ производство ООО"ТВпро Медиа" Hyundai i30 компактный автомобиль компании Hyundai Motor Company. Был создан на одной платформе с Kia Cee'd. Hyundai i30 выпускается, как пятидверный с кузовом хэтчбэк, так универсал. Подписывайтесь на наш канал и получайте свежие новости, тест-драйвы и обзоры автомобилей из первых рук!





2013 Hyundai i30 - road test





Crash Test Lamborghini, Honda, Range Rover, Pagani Huayra #28
crash test Avto Man Subscribe to new videos http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=1AVTOman Car Crashes Compilation 2014





Hyundai i30 my2013 1.6 crdi Test Drive da HDmotori.it





Worst EuroNCAP crash tests ever (pre 2009 ratings)
Years testing:1997-2008 The worst score gets Nissan Navara. Tested in 2008. The best score gets Chrysler Voyager. Tested in 2007.





EuroNCAP-Crashtests: BMW X1, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke und mehr
http://www.auto-news.de Die EuroNCAP-Experten haben fünf neue Crashtests durchgeführt. Geprüft wurden der BMW X1, der Dacia Duster, der Mitsubishi ASX, das Elektroauto Mitsubishi i-MiEV und der Nissan Juke. Drei Kandidaten erhielten die Maximalwertung von fünf Sternen, die übrigen zwei nur drei beziehungsweise vier. Die Sternewertung ist das Gesamtresultat eines Tests, darüber hinaus gibt es Teilergebnisse, die in Prozentwerten angegeben werden. Die Disziplinen heißen Sicherheit der Frontinsassen -- beim Frontalaufprall, Seitenaufprall einer Barriere, eines Pfahls und Heckaufprall --, Sicherheit von Kindern im Fond, Sicherheit von Fußgängern bei einem Aufprall auf die Fronthaube und Ausstattung mit Sicherheitssystemen wie ESP.





Hyundai i30 my2013 focus infotainment da HDmotori.it





Hyundai i30 Тест-драйв.Anton Avtoman.
Цены и комплектации http://hyundai-tts.ru/automobili/i30/komplektaciya-i-ceni/ http://vk.com/id132523895 Добавляйтесь в друзья!) http://www.facebook.com/anton.vorotnikov https://plus.google.com/u/0/110807444081517706579/posts Ещё Автомобили С класса http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLW46cP6LCzTVJXJMk3DUEDzECztTxwoDP Автомобиль Hyundai i30 предоставлен на тест-драйв компанией ТТС официальный дилер HYUNDAI





Crash Test Global Ncap India: Hyundai i10, VW Polo, Tata Nano, Ford Figo - 0 Stars
The first-ever independent crash tests of some of India's popular and important small cars have shown a high-risk of life threatening injuries in road crashes. All the cars selected by Global NCAP for testing in a frontal impact at 64km/h received zero-star adult protection ratings. The models tested included India's best-selling car, the Suzuki-Maruti Alto 800. The Tata Nano, Ford Figo, Hyundai i10 and Volkswagen Polo also underwent the safety assessment. Combined sales of these five cars account for around 20% of all the new cars sold in India last year. Global NCAP chose the entry-level version of each model and as a result none were fitted with air bags as standard. The results highlight major differences in the structural integrity of the vehicles tested. Max Mosley, Chairman of Global NCAP, said: "India is now a major global market and production centre for small cars, so it's worrying to see levels of safety that are 20 years behind the five-star standards now common in Europe and North America. Poor structural integrity and the absence of airbags are putting the lives of Indian consumers at risk. They have a right to know how safe their vehicles are and to expect the same basic levels of safety as standard as customers in other part of the world." In the Suzuki-Maruti Alto 800, the Tata Nano and the Hyundai i10, the vehicle structures proved inadequate and collapsed to varying degrees, resulting in high risks of life-threatening injuries to the occupants. The extent of the structural weaknesses in these models were such that fitting airbags would not be effective in reducing the risk of serious injury. The Ford Figo and Volkswagen Polo had structures that remained stable -- and, therefore, with airbags fitted, protection for the driver and front passenger would be much improved. Coinciding with the Global NCAP tests, Volkswagen has decided to withdraw the non-airbag version of the Polo from sale in India. Because of this, Global NCAP agreed to a request from VW to assess a version of the Polo that has two airbags fitted as standard as from now. Other manufacturers had the same opportunity. The protection proved much better and this airbag-equipped model received a four-star rating for adult occupant protection. Consumers are encouraged to check which version of the Polo they buy. - See more at: http://www.globalncap.org/crash-tests-show-indias-cars-are-unsafe/#sthash.W EEJ0RJ8.dpuf ►THANKS for taking the time to visit, I hope you SUBSCRIBE and enjoy the upcoming videos! I'm an italian petrolhead and cars & motorbikes are my passion which I want to share with all the petrolheads around the world by taking these videos. ►If You like, PLEASE SUBSCRIBE NOW for More videos: http://bit.ly/12ULPud ►Gommeblog.it, Portale dedicato alla Tecnica e Performance di Auto e Moto. Al Suo interno potrai trovare sezioni dedicate a Supercar, Video Test di tutte le più importanti case e bran come Alfa Romeo. Audi, Abarth, BMW, Mercedes, Ferrari, Lamborghini, MTM, AMG, Porsche, Aston Martin, Koenigsegg, Gumpert (solo per citarne alcune) e interssanti video recensioni su gomme Michelin, Pirelli, Dunlop, Goodyear, Continental ... ►Non perderti le Ultime NEWS Video: ISCRIVITI ADESSO AL CANALE: http://bit.ly/12ULPud ►If you like this video Please rate and comment! ►Se questo video ti è piaciuto, Clicca mi Piace o Lascia un commento ►Follow Us on Social Network: ►Google +: https://plus.google.com/101792401712738693835/ ►Facebook: http://facebook.com/gommeblog ►Twitter: https://twitter.com/gommeblog ►Website: http://www.gommeblog.it




Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?





Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1998 Infiniti I30 t: 13.400 @ 107.000
Ant, Engine: VQ30DE, Tires: Nankang Ultra-Sport


1999 Infiniti I30 : 16.976 @ 82.470
Boggie, Engine: VG30DE,


 


©2014 DragTimes - Disclaimer