Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

► 2013 Hyundai i30 CRASH TEST

http://www.youcar.tv The passenger compartment of the i30 remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Hyundai showed that a similar level of protection would be provided for occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was weak. The seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. Based on dummy results in the dynamic tests, the i30 scored maximum points for its protection of both the 18 month infant and the 3 year old child. In the frontal impact, forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising he likelihood of contact with parts of the car's interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled by means of a switch, allowing a rearward facing child restraint to be used in the passenger seat. The system provided clear information to the driver regarding the status of the airbag. There were clear warnings of the dangers of using a reaward facing restraint in that seating position without having deactivated the airbag. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians and the car scored maximum points in this area. The front edge of the bonnet provided predominantly good protection. In most areas where a child's head might strike, the bonnet provided good protection but the protection of an adult's head was mixed.


 


More Videos...


► 2012 BMW 3 Series CRASH TEST
► http://www.facebook.com/youcarpress The passenger compartment of the 3 Series remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. BMW showed that a similar level of protection would be provided for occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, all body regions were well protected and the car scored maximum points. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest and abdomen was adequate and that of the head and pelvis was good. The seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. Based on dummy restults in the dynamic tests, the 3 Series scored maximum points for its protection of the 18 month infant, and lost only a fraction of a point for protection of the 3 year old. In the frontal impact, forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of contact with parts of the car's interior. A switch is available as an option to deactivate the passenger airbag, allowing a rearward facing child restraint to be used in the passenger seat. This was not assessed as it is not standard equipment. There were clear warnings of the dangers of using a rearward facing restraint in that seating position without having deactivated the airbag. Both the bumper and the front edge of the bonnet provided good protection to pedestrians and the car scored maximum points in these areas. In almost all areas where a child's head might strike, the bonnet provided good protection but was predominantly poor in those areas likely to be struck by an adult's head.





► Renault Alpine A110-50 Proto - TRAILER
► http://www.youcar.tv Design clip where the concept car Renault Alpine A110-50 meets Renault Alpine A110.





[ESC TEST] 2013 Hyundai i30
► http://www.youcar.tv Electronic stability control is standard equipment on the i30 and met Euro NCAP's requirements. A seatbelt reminder is standard for the driver, front passenger and rear seats. A speed limitation device is available but was not assessed by Euro NCAP as it is offered as an option.





► 2013 Mazda CX-5 CRASH TEST
► http://www.youcar.tv The passenger compartment of the CX-5 remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Mazda showed that a similar level of protection would be provided for occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, protection of all body regions was good and the car scored maximum points. Even in the more severe side pole test, the driver was well protected in all areas and maximum points were scored. The seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. Based on dummy readings in the dynamic tests, the CX-5 scored maximum points for its protection of the 3 year child and lost only a fraction of a point for protection of the 18 month infant. In the frontal impact, forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of contact with parts of the car's interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled by means of a switch, allowing a rearward facing child restraint to be used in the passenger seat. Clear information is provided regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. There were clear warnings of the dangers of using a reaward facing restraint in that seating position without having first deactivated the airbag. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians and the car scored maximum points in this area. The front edge of the bonnet was at best marginal in the protection offered to pedestrians. In most areas where it might be struck by the head of a child or an adult, the bonnet provided good protection.





Hyundai i30 1,6l GDi explicit video 1 of 4
For comments, more details, pictures and videos: http://www.turatii.ro





2. Bad Crash Tests Compilation 1
Here is a video compilation showing some vehicles that perform poorly on crash tests. This video includes vehicles other than cars. All of these vehicles did poorly on the crash test(s). Crash Tests: 1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ukq-UUQAcZs 2. Blue Bird TC1000/TC2000 side impact test http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFD-XxTJ_rk 3-6. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOs6MrYDhc4 7. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqI5R7XYBac 8. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-TWXjDYqCk





Hyundai i30 Engine and Interior
Everything about the new i30: http://www.automobilismo.it/articoli_cerca?t=i30





Hyundai i30 2012 1,6 GDI - acceleration 0-200 km/h
For future comparison with VW Golf VII 1,4 TSI... More at http://www.Autoforum.cz





TOP 10 WORST CRASH TESTS
Thanks For Watching! Make Sure You Leave A Like! And Make Sure You Subscribe To Me And Others! Twitter: https://twitter.com/rp01ful https://twitter.com/RP01fulYoutube RP01ful : http://www.youtube.com/user/RP01ful Mr Geoclay : http://www.youtube.com/user/MrGeoclay Hi!, It's Regan : http://www.youtube.com/channel/UClVzxtLAINUdDv-JIP7XB0A exL Aquas : http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbo0RvMR7MAfo4KOHlNDlyg Theawsomegamer: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZ-pj2aAST-0FMr96hsyrxg Make Sure You Like My friends Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/snapsaplenty





Team Review: Hyundai i30 - Fifth Gear
The team have the Hyundai i30, and review it on it's looks, handling and power. But some seem more impressed than others! For more fantastic car reviews, shoot-outs and all your favourite Fifth Gear moments, subscribe to our Official Channel - https://www.youtube.com/user/fifthgearuk





Airbag Test
Opels Airbag Misuse test ensures driving safety.





Crash Test Global Ncap India: Hyundai i10, VW Polo, Tata Nano, Ford Figo - 0 Stars
The first-ever independent crash tests of some of India's popular and important small cars have shown a high-risk of life threatening injuries in road crashes. All the cars selected by Global NCAP for testing in a frontal impact at 64km/h received zero-star adult protection ratings. The models tested included India's best-selling car, the Suzuki-Maruti Alto 800. The Tata Nano, Ford Figo, Hyundai i10 and Volkswagen Polo also underwent the safety assessment. Combined sales of these five cars account for around 20% of all the new cars sold in India last year. Global NCAP chose the entry-level version of each model and as a result none were fitted with air bags as standard. The results highlight major differences in the structural integrity of the vehicles tested. Max Mosley, Chairman of Global NCAP, said: "India is now a major global market and production centre for small cars, so it's worrying to see levels of safety that are 20 years behind the five-star standards now common in Europe and North America. Poor structural integrity and the absence of airbags are putting the lives of Indian consumers at risk. They have a right to know how safe their vehicles are and to expect the same basic levels of safety as standard as customers in other part of the world." In the Suzuki-Maruti Alto 800, the Tata Nano and the Hyundai i10, the vehicle structures proved inadequate and collapsed to varying degrees, resulting in high risks of life-threatening injuries to the occupants. The extent of the structural weaknesses in these models were such that fitting airbags would not be effective in reducing the risk of serious injury. The Ford Figo and Volkswagen Polo had structures that remained stable -- and, therefore, with airbags fitted, protection for the driver and front passenger would be much improved. Coinciding with the Global NCAP tests, Volkswagen has decided to withdraw the non-airbag version of the Polo from sale in India. Because of this, Global NCAP agreed to a request from VW to assess a version of the Polo that has two airbags fitted as standard as from now. Other manufacturers had the same opportunity. The protection proved much better and this airbag-equipped model received a four-star rating for adult occupant protection. Consumers are encouraged to check which version of the Polo they buy. - See more at: http://www.globalncap.org/crash-tests-show-indias-cars-are-unsafe/#sthash.W EEJ0RJ8.dpuf ►THANKS for taking the time to visit, I hope you SUBSCRIBE and enjoy the upcoming videos! I'm an italian petrolhead and cars & motorbikes are my passion which I want to share with all the petrolheads around the world by taking these videos. ►If You like, PLEASE SUBSCRIBE NOW for More videos: http://bit.ly/12ULPud ►Gommeblog.it, Portale dedicato alla Tecnica e Performance di Auto e Moto. Al Suo interno potrai trovare sezioni dedicate a Supercar, Video Test di tutte le più importanti case e bran come Alfa Romeo. Audi, Abarth, BMW, Mercedes, Ferrari, Lamborghini, MTM, AMG, Porsche, Aston Martin, Koenigsegg, Gumpert (solo per citarne alcune) e interssanti video recensioni su gomme Michelin, Pirelli, Dunlop, Goodyear, Continental ... ►Non perderti le Ultime NEWS Video: ISCRIVITI ADESSO AL CANALE: http://bit.ly/12ULPud ►If you like this video Please rate and comment! ►Se questo video ti è piaciuto, Clicca mi Piace o Lascia un commento ►Follow Us on Social Network: ►Google +: https://plus.google.com/101792401712738693835/ ►Facebook: http://facebook.com/gommeblog ►Twitter: https://twitter.com/gommeblog ►Website: http://www.gommeblog.it





Hyundai i30 1,6l GDi explicit video 2 of 4
For comments, more details, pictures and videos: http://www.turatii.ro





Crash Test Lamborghini, Honda, Range Rover, Pagani Huayra #28
crash test Avto Man Subscribe to new videos http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=1AVTOman Car Crashes Compilation 2014





Hyundai i30 hatchback 2013 review - CarBuyer
Hyundai i30 hatchback 2014 review: http://bit.ly/z4ikck Subscribe to the Carbuyer YouTube channel: http://bit.ly/17k4fct Subscribe to Auto Express: http://subscribe.autoexpress.co.uk/cb "The Hyundai i30 has bridged the gap to the likes of the VW Golf in terms of quality, performance and running costs."





Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?




Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1998 Infiniti I30 t: 13.400 @ 107.000
Ant, Engine: VQ30DE, Tires: Nankang Ultra-Sport


2002 Infiniti I30 T: 13.926 @ 104.250
Tim V, Engine: Vq30de-k,


1999 Infiniti I30 : 16.976 @ 82.470
Boggie, Engine: VG30DE,


 


©2014 DragTimes - Disclaimer - Contact Us