2012 Lancia Voyager/Chrysler Grand Voyager EuroNCAP Crash Tests (Frontal, Side, & Pole Impacts)
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated poor protection for the knees and femurs of the passenger occupant. The steering column and facia also provided hazards to the driver occupant. The Voyager scored maximum points for the protection it provided in the side barrier test. In the more severe side pole impact, protection was good in most body areas and adequate for the chest. The front seat and active head restraints provided marginal protection against whiplash injuries in a rear-end collision.
Based on dummy readings in the frontal and side impact tests, the Voyager scored full points for protection of the 3 year old child. Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive and both the 3 year and 18 month dummies were properly contained by their restraints in the side impact, minimising the risk of dangerous head contact. However, the ISOFIX child restraints are mounted on support stands, the legs of which rest on storage compartments in the floor of the rear seating positions. For the 18 month dummy, the cover of this storage compartment partially collapsed during the frontal impact and Euro NCAP awarded no points for compatibility of the restraints with the vehicle. Lancia has stated that they will implement improvements to eliminate this concern. The passenger airbag cannot be disabled, preventing the fitment of a rearward-facing child restraint in that seating position. The sun-visor label warning of the dangers of using a rearward facing child seat in that position were presented in the relevant EU languages and did not meet the Euro NCAP requirements.
The Voyager is equipped with an 'active' bonnet. Sensors in the bumper determine when a pedestrian has been struck and actuators lift the bonnet to provide greater clearance to hard structures underneath. Lancia showed that the system worked for a wide range of pedestrian statures and over a range of speeds, so the car was tested with the system deployed. Although some areas were good, most areas likely to be struck by a pedestrian's head offered poor protection. The area likely to be struck by a pedestrian's hip and pelvis was poor in all areas tested and scored no points. The bumper offered good protection to a pedestrian's legs.
Electronic stability control is standard and met Euro NCAP's requirements. Speed limitation devices are not availble. There is a seatbelt reminder system for the driver and passenger seats only.
TOP 10 WORST CRASH TESTS
UPDATED VERSION: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRyAB1aC0bw
Thanks For Watching! Make Sure You Leave A Like!
And Make Sure You Subscribe To Me And Others!
Mr Geoclay :
Hi!, It's Regan :
exL Aquas :
Make Sure You Like My friends Facebook Page:
21. Dateline 1995, 1996, 1997 Minivan IIHS Crash Test.flv
Dateline NBC: Crash Test
Ford Windstar, Mazda MPV, ɛ̃fini MPV, Dodge Caravan, Dodge Grand Caravan,
Chrysler Town and Country, Chrysler Town & Country, Chrysler T&C, Chrysler
Voyager, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Plymouth Voyager, Plymouth Grand Voyager,
Chrysler Voyager, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Caravan, Chrysler Grand
Caravan, Honda Odyssey, Honda Shuttle, Isuzu Oasis, Nissan Quest, Mercury
Villager, Chevrolet Astro, GMC Safari, Ford Aerostar, Toyota Previa, Toyota
Estima, Toyota Tarago, Toyota Canarado, Pontiac Trans Sport, Oldsmobile
Silhouette, Chevrolet Venture, Chevrolet Trans Sport, Pontiac Montana, Opel
Sintra, Vauxhall Sintra
From Mrchevy baja (unlisted channel) (used to be bajabusta)
Crash test Ford Focus a 190 km/h, Fifth Gear
http://www.sicurauto.it - Cosa succede ad una Ford Focus che va a
scontrarsi contro un muro a 190km/h?
Scopriamolo insieme nel crash test di Fifth Gear...
(Fonte video: Five TV UK)
Euro NCAP | Pedestrian safety
Pedestrian-vehicle crashes are responsible for more than a third of all
traffic related fatalities and injuries worldwide. Many crashes involving
pedestrians occur in urban areas where cars drive at relatively low speeds.
The severity of injuries can be significantly reduced if appropriate
countermeasures are taken on the vehicle front-end. Euro NCAP uses
standardized tests that simulate the most common pedestrian-vehicle crashes
to assess the level of pedestrian safety.
Chrysler Grand Voyager review - What Car?
Read the What Car? Chrysler Grand Voyager review http://bit.ly/xAIVzQ
The Grand Voyager offers loads of space and ingenious fold-away rear seats.
Its classy image means decent residual values, too.
The diesel engine is underpowered and the interior quality is rather
Become our friend on Facebook: http://on.fb.me/dKOpu8
Follow us on Twitter: http://bit.ly/x3WZtV
What Car? is the UK's biggest car-buying brand and has been helping
Britain's car buyers make purchasing decisions for over 40 years. Our tests
are widely regarded as the most trusted source of new car advice.
This channel brings you trusted reviews on all the new models on the market
, all the latest first drives, reader reviews, and great car-buying advice.
All reviews are available in full online at Whatcar.com - the UK's leading
car-buying website, offering trusted reviews and data on every new car. The
website also offers advice on car leasing, new car deals and used cars for
Like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/whatcar
Visit us online: http://www.whatcar.com
Chrysler Town & Country Limited V6 2010
Madness US vous propose le grand monospace Town & Country de chez Chrysler,
le cousin américain de notre Grand Voyager, qui n'est plus disponible en
Europe qu'en version diesel. C'est pourquoi Madness US vous propose la
version américaine, motorisée par un V6 essence de 4 litres de cylindrée
développant la puissance de 251 chevaux. Le modèle que nous vous
proposons ici est le modèle finition Limited toutes options, c'est un
monospace familial trés haut en gamme et aussi performant qu'agréable à
conduire ! Découvrez le sur http://www.madness-us-cars.com/
2012 Toyota Yaris/Vitz EuroNCAP Crash Tests (Frontal, Side, & Pole Impacts)
In the frontal impact, the passenger compartment remained stable. Dummy
readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver
and passenger. Toyota showed that a similar level of protection would be
provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different
positions. Maximum points were awarded for protection of the driver dummy,
all body areas being well protected. In the side barrier test, dummy
readings indicated good protection of all body areas. In the more severe
side pole test, the curtain airbag became slightly trapped behind the trim
of the windscreen pillar, and the head scores for both the side barrier and
side pole tests were penalised. In the pole impact, dummy readings of rib
compressions indicated marginal chest protection. The seat and head
restraint provided marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the
event of a rear-end collision.
In the frontal impact, movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward
facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were
properly contained by the shells of their restraints. The passenger airbag
can be disabled by means of a switch to allow a rearward facing restraint
to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the
driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. The
dangers of using a rearward facing seat in the position without first
disabling the airbag are explained in permanently attached labels.
The bumper scored maximum points for protection of dummies' legs. The front
edge of the bonnet was predominantly poor. In those areas likely to be
struck by a child's head, the bonnet offered predominantly good protection,
as it did for an adult's head.
Electronic stability control is standard equipment on all variants in most
European countries but is an option on some variants in certain countries.
The system met Euro NCAP's fitment requirements for 2011 and complied with
the test requirements. A seat belt reminder is standard for the driver,
passenger and rear seats. A speed limitation device is not available for
Chrysler Voyager Warped Brake Disks
This 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager CRD had badly warped disks, the steering
juddered a lot when braking which was especially noticeable at motorway
After putting new disks and pads on the car the problem was solved.
The disks were blue print, and the pads were apec.
2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager
Video ini merupakan video review dari mobil69, dan pada review kali ini,
kami melakukan test drive dengan mobil Chrysler Grand Voyager tahun 2002.
Visit us on http://mobil69.com/
Like our Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/home.php
And follow us on Twitter @ http://twitter.com/mobil69_com
This video contain material from Queen, all rights are belong to the
Thank you for watching and see you next episode.
Наши тесты - Chrysler Grand Voyager (2008)
Больше тест-драйвов каждый день -
подписывайтесь на канал -
Присоединяйтесь к АВТО ПЛЮС:
Мой мир: http://my.mail.ru/community/autoplustv
2012 Opel/Vauxhall Zafira Tourer EuroNCAP Crash Tests (Frontal, Side, & Pole Impacts)
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy
readings for the passenger indicated good protecction of all body areas.
There were no structures in the facia which might present a hazard to the
knees or femurs, and protection of this body area was rated as good for
both driver and front passenger. In the side impact all body regions were
well protected but, in the pole impact, dummy readings of rib compression
indicated marginal chest protection. The front seat and head restraints
provided good protection against whiplash injuries in a rear-end collision.
The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child
restraint to be used in that seating position, and clear information was
provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag so the system was
rewarded. Permanently attached labels on the sun visor clearly warn of the
dangers of using a rearward facing child seat in that position without
first disabling the airbag. In the frontal impact, forward movement of the
3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive and, in
the side impact, both child dummies were contained within the protective
shells of their restraints, minimising the risk of dangerous head contacts.
Most of the areas likely to be struck by an adult pedestrian's head offered
poor protection but for small adults and children protection was mostly
good. The protection offered to the hip and pelvic areas was poor in all
areas tested. The bumper offered predominantly good protection to
pedestrians' legs but some areas were marginal or poor.
Electronic stability control is standard and met Euro NCAP's requirements.
Speed limitation devices are only availble as an option. There is a
seatbelt reminder system for the driver, passenger and rear seats, all of
which met Euro NCAP's requirements.
2012 Mercedes-Benz M-Class (W166) EuroNCAP Crash Tests (Frontal, Side, & Pole Impacts)
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy
readings indicated good protection for the knees and femurs of both driver
and front passenger. Mercedes Benz showed that a similar level of
protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and those sat
in different positions. The M Class scored maximum points in the side
barrier test. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest
was adequate and that of all other body areas was good. The front seats and
head restraints provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the
event of a rear impact.
Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint,
was not excessive. In the side impact, both child dummies were properly
contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the
risk of dangerous head contact. The front passenger airbag can be disabled
only by child restraints equipped with Mercedes Benz's automtic sensor
system, known as CPOD. As there is no way of disabling the airbag for other
rearward-facing restraints, the system was not rewarded by Euro NCAP.
Permanently attached labels provided clear warnings of the dangers of using
that seating position without first disabling the airbag.
The M Class has an 'active' bonnet. Sensors in the bumper detect when a
pedestrian has been struck and actuators lift the rear of the bonnet to
provide greater clearance to hard structures underneath. Mercedes
demonstrated that the system would deploy correctly for a wide range of
pedestrian statures, and over a broad speed range. In all areas likely to
be struck by the head of an adult, the bonnet provided good protection. In
the areas likely to be struck by a child's head, protection was mixed, with
areas of good, marginal and poor performance. The protection offered by the
front edge of the bonnet to pedestrians was poor.
The M Class has electronic stability control as standard, as well a
seatbelt reminder system for the driver, passenger and rear seats. A
driver-set speed limitation device is standard equipment but did not meet
Euro NCAP's requirements.