Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

Euro NCAP | Audi A6 | 2011 | Crash test

http://www.euroncap.com/results/audi/a6/2011/435.aspx Frontal Impact takes place at 64 Km/h, 40% of the width of the car striking a deformable barrier. In the side impact, a mobile deformable barrier impacts the driver's door at 50 km/h. In the pole test, the car tested is propelled sideways at 29km/h into a rigid pole.


 


More Videos...


TOP 10 WORST CRASH TESTS
Thanks For Watching! Make Sure You Leave A Like! And Make Sure You Subscribe To Me And Others! Twitter: https://twitter.com/rp01ful https://twitter.com/RP01fulYoutube RP01ful : http://www.youtube.com/user/RP01ful Mr Geoclay : http://www.youtube.com/user/MrGeoclay Hi!, It's Regan : http://www.youtube.com/channel/UClVzxtLAINUdDv-JIP7XB0A exL Aquas : http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbo0RvMR7MAfo4KOHlNDlyg Theawsomegamer: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZ-pj2aAST-0FMr96hsyrxg Make Sure You Like My friends Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/snapsaplenty





SMART car crash (TEST)





BMW all Series - Crash Test 2013
► SUBSCRIBE NOW : Subscribe : http://www.youtube.com/user/Auto1News?sub_confirmation=1





2009 Chevy Malibu vs 1959 Bel Air Crash Test
This crash test between a modern sedan and the classic 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air shows just how far passenger protection has come in the last fifty years. The Institute for Highway Safety staged the test to commemorate its 50th anniversary. Find more crash tests on our web site: http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/video-hub/cars/iihs-crash-tests/67619540 5001/?EXTKEY=I93YT01&CMP=OTC-YUTBE





Ford Focus Crash Test
FIlmed at Millbrook Proving Ground in their crash test lab using a psc unit and mulitple high speed cameras shooting at 1000fps for the crash.





► 2009 BMW X6 - CRASH TEST
► http://www.facebook.com/youcarpress





Mercedes C-Class VS Chevrolet Malibu - CRASH TEST





2010 Mercedes S-Class CRASH TEST
► http://www.facebook.com/youcarpress





Crash Test Global Ncap India: Hyundai i10, VW Polo, Tata Nano, Ford Figo - 0 Stars
The first-ever independent crash tests of some of India's popular and important small cars have shown a high-risk of life threatening injuries in road crashes. All the cars selected by Global NCAP for testing in a frontal impact at 64km/h received zero-star adult protection ratings. The models tested included India's best-selling car, the Suzuki-Maruti Alto 800. The Tata Nano, Ford Figo, Hyundai i10 and Volkswagen Polo also underwent the safety assessment. Combined sales of these five cars account for around 20% of all the new cars sold in India last year. Global NCAP chose the entry-level version of each model and as a result none were fitted with air bags as standard. The results highlight major differences in the structural integrity of the vehicles tested. Max Mosley, Chairman of Global NCAP, said: "India is now a major global market and production centre for small cars, so it's worrying to see levels of safety that are 20 years behind the five-star standards now common in Europe and North America. Poor structural integrity and the absence of airbags are putting the lives of Indian consumers at risk. They have a right to know how safe their vehicles are and to expect the same basic levels of safety as standard as customers in other part of the world." In the Suzuki-Maruti Alto 800, the Tata Nano and the Hyundai i10, the vehicle structures proved inadequate and collapsed to varying degrees, resulting in high risks of life-threatening injuries to the occupants. The extent of the structural weaknesses in these models were such that fitting airbags would not be effective in reducing the risk of serious injury. The Ford Figo and Volkswagen Polo had structures that remained stable -- and, therefore, with airbags fitted, protection for the driver and front passenger would be much improved. Coinciding with the Global NCAP tests, Volkswagen has decided to withdraw the non-airbag version of the Polo from sale in India. Because of this, Global NCAP agreed to a request from VW to assess a version of the Polo that has two airbags fitted as standard as from now. Other manufacturers had the same opportunity. The protection proved much better and this airbag-equipped model received a four-star rating for adult occupant protection. Consumers are encouraged to check which version of the Polo they buy. - See more at: http://www.globalncap.org/crash-tests-show-indias-cars-are-unsafe/#sthash.W EEJ0RJ8.dpuf ►THANKS for taking the time to visit, I hope you SUBSCRIBE and enjoy the upcoming videos! I'm an italian petrolhead and cars & motorbikes are my passion which I want to share with all the petrolheads around the world by taking these videos. ►If You like, PLEASE SUBSCRIBE NOW for More videos: http://bit.ly/12ULPud ►Gommeblog.it, Portale dedicato alla Tecnica e Performance di Auto e Moto. Al Suo interno potrai trovare sezioni dedicate a Supercar, Video Test di tutte le più importanti case e bran come Alfa Romeo. Audi, Abarth, BMW, Mercedes, Ferrari, Lamborghini, MTM, AMG, Porsche, Aston Martin, Koenigsegg, Gumpert (solo per citarne alcune) e interssanti video recensioni su gomme Michelin, Pirelli, Dunlop, Goodyear, Continental ... ►Non perderti le Ultime NEWS Video: ISCRIVITI ADESSO AL CANALE: http://bit.ly/12ULPud ►If you like this video Please rate and comment! ►Se questo video ti è piaciuto, Clicca mi Piace o Lascia un commento ►Follow Us on Social Network: ►Google +: https://plus.google.com/101792401712738693835/ ►Facebook: http://facebook.com/gommeblog ►Twitter: https://twitter.com/gommeblog ►Website: http://www.gommeblog.it





CRASH TEST Mercedes S-Class
CRASH TEST 2010 Mercedes S-Class http://www.youcar.tv





► 2006 Chrysler 300 - CRASH TEST
► http://www.facebook.com/youcarpress





Tata Nano scores zero stars in Global NCAP crash tests
The first-ever independent crash tests of some of India's popular and important small cars have shown a high-risk of life threatening injuries in road crashes. In the 64km/h NCAP test, the Tata Nano achieved zero stars rating for its adult occupant protection. The vehicle structure was rated as unstable, increasing the risk of life-threatening injuries and making the car unsuitable for the fitment of airbags. The car achieved a zero-star rating for its child protection as it was not possible to install child seats in the car. The Nano was not able to meet the UN's minimum safety requirements in the 56km/h crash test. Read more about the crash tests here: http://bit.ly/1loNVSh





► Smart Fortwo VS Mercedes E-Class - CRASH TEST
More Crash Test on http://www.youcarpress.com





Euro NCAP | Opel Ampera | 2011 | Crash test
http://www.euroncap.com/results/opel_vauxhall/ampera/2011/443.aspx Frontal Impact takes place at 64 Km/h, 40% of the width of the car striking a deformable barrier. In the side impact, a mobile deformable barrier impacts the driver's door at 50 km/h. In the pole test, the car tested is propelled sideways at 29km/h into a rigid pole.





DEADLY Crashes: 2013 IIHS Crash Tests
DEADLY Crashes: 2013 IIHS Crash Tests DEADLY Сбои: 2013 IIHS краш-тестов ÖLÜMCÜL Çöküyor: 2013 IIHS Crash Testleri DEADLY Crashes: 2013 IIHS Crash Tests IIHS news release New crash tests: Underride guards on most big rigs leave passenger vehicle occupants at risk in certain crashes Modern semitrailers for the most part do a good job of keeping passenger vehicles from sliding underneath them, greatly increasing the chances of surviving a crash into the back of a large truck, recent tests by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) show. But in crashes involving only a small portion of the truck's rear, most trailers fail to prevent potentially deadly underride. Full text of release at: http://www.iihs.org/iihs/news/desktopnews/new-crash-tests-underride-guards- on-most-big-rigs-leave-passenger-vehicle-occupants-at-risk-in-certain-crash es ►THANKS for taking the time to visit, I hope you SUBSCRIBE and enjoy the upcoming videos! I'm an italian petrolhead and cars & motorbikes are my passion which I want to share with all the petrolheads around the world by taking these videos. ►If You like, PLEASE SUBSCRIBE NOW for More videos: http://bit.ly/12ULPud ►Gommeblog.it, Portale dedicato alla Tecnica e Performance di Auto e Moto. Al Suo interno potrai trovare sezioni dedicate a Supercar, Video Test di tutte le più importanti case e bran come Alfa Romeo. Audi, Abarth, BMW, Mercedes, Ferrari, Lamborghini, MTM, AMG, Porsche, Aston Martin, Koenigsegg, Gumpert (solo per citarne alcune) e interssanti video recensioni su gomme Michelin, Pirelli, Dunlop, Goodyear, Continental ... ►Non perderti le Ultime NEWS Video: ISCRIVITI ADESSO AL CANALE: http://bit.ly/12ULPud ►If you like this video Please rate and comment! ►Se questo video ti è piaciuto, Clicca mi Piace o Lascia un commento ►Follow Us on Social Network: ►Google +: https://plus.google.com/101792401712738693835/ ►Facebook: http://facebook.com/gommeblog ►Twitter: https://twitter.com/gommeblog ►Website: http://www.gommeblog.it




Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?





Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

2001 Audi A6 2.7TT SSP Tuned: 11.830 @ 119.030
Nick, Turbos: K04


2009 Audi A6 Prestige: 12.630 @ 108.730
Ken, Engine: 3.0TFSI, Supercharger: Stock


2000 Audi A6 2.7T 6MT Quattro: 12.807 @ 105.340
10SecS4,


2009 Audi A6 Prestige: 12.942 @ 108.900
Ken, Engine: 3.0TFSI, Supercharger: Stock Tires: Michelin Pilot Alpin PA3


2002 Audi A6 2.7t: 13.024 @ 106.490
Richard Henry, Engine: 2.7t, Turbos: K03


2002 Audi A6 2.7T: 13.224 @ 105.540
Richard Henry, Engine: 2.7T, Turbos: K03


2010 Audi A6 3.0T Stasis: 13.280 @ 107.870
Ed, Engine: 3.0T, Supercharger: yes


2000 Audi A6 A6 2.7T: 13.331 @ 105.930
Simon, Engine: Stock, Turbos: Stock


2002 Audi A6 2.7T: 13.338 @ 105.060
Richard Henry, Turbos: stock k03


2002 Audi A6 2.7T 6speed: 13.370 @ 100.340
John Turcotte, Engine: GIAC X chip,


2013 Audi A6 Biturbo Diesel: 13.400 @ 104.050
jet, Engine: 2993, Turbos: 2


2002 Audi A6 2.7t: 13.534 @ 103.590
Richard Henry, Engine: 2.7t, Turbos: stock K03


2002 Audi A6 2.7t: 13.647 @ 101.450
Richard Henry, Engine: 2.7t, Turbos: stock Tires: stock


2001 Audi A6 2.7T: 13.823 @ 97.700
Mark Williams,


2001 Audi A6 2.7t 6spd: 13.995 @ 100.880
Hat, Engine: 2.7t, Turbos: k03


2001 Audi A6 2.7T: 14.000 @ 102.122
Nick M, Engine: V6 2.7 Bi-Turbo, Supercharger: none Turbos: stock Tires: stock


2001 Audi A6 2.7T 6 speed: 14.400 @ 99.000
Matt, Engine: 2.7L Twin Turbo V-6, Turbos: Stock K03s Tires: Toyo Proxes T1-S


2000 Audi A6 2.7T 6 spd: 14.430 @ 94.990
Jim Will, Engine: V6 2.7T, Turbos: Twin


2009 Audi A6 3.0T Quattro: 14.510 @ 96.990
NA, Engine: V6 Supercharged: 300HP,


2002 Audi A6 2.7t: 14.639 @ 92.560
Richard Henry, Engine: 2.7t, Turbos: stock K03 Tires: stock


 


©2014 DragTimes - Disclaimer