Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

2009 Nissan GT-R vs BMW X5M Drag Racing 1/4 Mile

http://www.dragtimes.com/


 


More Videos...


2012 Nissan GT-R vs 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG RENNtech Drag Racing
http://www.dragitmes.com/





Jeep SRT-8 Supercharged vs BMW X5M with a RENNtech Tune Drag Racing 1/4 Mile
http://www.dragtimes.com/





2006 Pontiac GTO vs 2006 Corvette Z06 Stock on Drag Radials Drag Racing 1/4 Mile
http://www.dragtimes.com/





2012 Nissan GT-R vs Porsche 911 Turbo Drag Racing
http://www.dragitmes.com/





Nissan R35 GTR 9.7@142 (730awhp) Stock Motor
Nissan R35 GTR 9.7@142 (730awhp) Stock motor and tranny 2009 GTR Upgraded turbos, e-85, 730awhp www.ThatRacingChannel.com





Drag Week 2013 - Monday Highlights
LIVE from Bowling Green, KY - We're bringing you all of the highlights of Drag Week 2013 - we'l be following the 1000 mile drag racing tour across the US all week.





Drag Race: 2012 Lexus LFA vs 2010 Nissan GT-R
We pit Lexus' first-ever supercar -- the $400,000 Lexus LFA -- against our long-term Nissan GT-R to find out which one is the king of the JDMs. Read the full story here: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/1008_2012_lexus_lfa_2010_nissan_ gtr_comparison/index.html Shot by: Jim Gleason Edited by: Jim Gleason





900ps HKS GT-R GT800+ 318km FISCO1'45"9 / LFA1'55"2
R35GT-Rを極限の速度域へ誘う『R35 GT800 RacingSpec』を、さらに高出力化するためにしカムシャフ 、ピストン+コンロッドセットを開発。900ps/100kg-m超えを 可能とする『GT800+ Racing Spec』が誕生しまた。 タービンキットは、究極の性能を求め、F1 V6ターボエンジンを彷彿とさせる『シンメトリーツイン ーボレイアウト』を採用するなど、自社で設計から組 立てを行うGTⅡ­タービンならではの拘りを注入。 また総合メーカーHKSとして、ただパーツを開発するだけ ではなく、800馬力以上の性能を世界各国で楽しんで頂け るよう、さま­ざまな商品との組み合わせによる走行テ ­トを実施し、車両全体のパッケージとして提案でき よう開発しております。 ノーマルはベストモータリングのドリキン土屋のタイム 、1'53"6なのでその差は7.7秒はすごい! LFAに至っては10秒も違う圧倒的パワー。 HKS凄すぎ! タイトル「Lexus LF-A vs GT-R vs F430 GT3 vs 911 GT2RS vs Corvette ZR1 」に純正スーパーカー達の車載映像在りますが、比較に ならない位の遅さです。おそらくニュルに持ち込めば、 LFAニュルよりも20秒位速いのでは!しかも安い。 318km/hはF1より10km/h位しか遅くなく、スーパーGT500より25 km/h速いのです。 ラップ的にはスーパーGT300クラスと同じ位ですかね。 さらに詳しい情報はHKSホームページで!! http://www.hks-power.co.jp/products/r35_gtr_parts/engine/engine.html http://www.hks-power.co.jp/products/r35_gtr_parts/turbo/turbo.html http://www.hks-tv.com I develop camshaft, piston + con rod set to make "R35 GT800 RacingSpec" which tempts R35GT-R into extreme speed level the high output more. 900ps/100kg-m super えを possibility and "GT800+ Racing Spec" to do were born. I find ultimate performance and adopt "a symmetry twin turbo layout" to remind of F1 V6 turbo engine, and the turbine kit injects the feelings only by GTII­ turbine assembling from a design in-house. In addition, I carry out the run test by the combination with the product which is state ­ state not only I develop just parts as general maker HKS, but also to have you enjoy performance more than 800HP in all the countries of the world and develop it to suggest it as a package of the whole vehicle.





Nissan GT-R(T-Killah) vs BMW X5M
Один из заездов открытия драг фестиваля в Орловском аэропорту 26 мая 2012г. канал на youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/imax057 канал vkontakte: http://vk.com/sgt_channel





X5M vs Golf GTI





Porsche 997 Turbo vs Nissan GTR
My Porsche 997 turbo Tiptronic With Evoms ECU and Fabspeed Exhaust vs Nissan GTR with Tune and Exhaust





2015 BMW X5 vs. 2015 Range Rover Sport
Head-to-head: 2014 Range Rover Sport vs. 2014 BMW X5 Today’s luxury SUVs are essentially luxury sedans on stilts, withal all the prestige and performance you could want. But not all of these Lux-u-vees are created equal, so we compare two of the very best, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport and the BMW X5. Both are all-new and massively improved for 2014. But which one wins? LED lighting in the front and rear, a chunky fender vent, and a chiseled shape make the 2014 Range Rover Sport a delight to look at. When it comes to testing two premium luxury SUVs that can push their price-tags into six figures, one thing is certain: neither is going to stink up the place. That’s why comparing the all-new 2014 BMW X5 and just-as-new Land Rover Range Rover Sport is like deciding between crème brûlée and crème caramel…they’re both delicious (and highly caloric). But alas, they have very different characters. Style Statements If you can only drive one at a time, and if it was my money, I’d go with the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Why? The 2014 BMW X5’s new exterior is dowdier than before, with slab sides and a blunter nose. We wouldn’t say the X5 is unattractive, but its design relies on things like nifty LED lights and various decorative ornaments on the fasciae and body-sides to dress up the styling. Like flat-front khakis and a pastel polo shirt; the X5 is country-club correct, if not terribly interesting. The Range Rover Sport has plenty of decoration on the exterior too. This includes sleek LED lighting at the front and rear, as well as a chunky fender vent. The chiseled shape is simply more distinctive than the BMW. Range Rover also offers countless customization opportunities, including an available contrast-color roof treatment. The clear fashion-statement winner here is definitely the Rover. The 2014 BMW X5 may not be the hottest looking thing, but it does the trick. Cabin Comfort Both of these vehicles have opulent cabins, with even more premium materials and features on the options lists. But the Bimmer bests the Range Rover Sport in two key areas: space (there’s more of it, with room for up to seven passengers) and the control interface. BMW has worked for years to perfect its hockey-puck-and-screen iDrive infotainment system, and now it works brilliantly. The Range Rover Sport can only seat five, and for infotainment, it uses a touch screen interface that can’t multitask terribly well and is annoyingly slow to respond to inputs. That said, the seats are wonderful (as they are in the Bimmer, to be fair), and Rover’s boxy interior design is quite regal and British in character. The 2014 BMW X5 may not be the hottest looking thing, but it does the trick. Cabin Comfort Both of these vehicles have opulent cabins, with even more premium materials and features on the options lists. But the Bimmer bests the Range Rover Sport in two key areas: space (there’s more of it, with room for up to seven passengers) and the control interface. BMW has worked for years to perfect its hockey-puck-and-screen iDrive infotainment system, and now it works brilliantly. The Range Rover Sport can only seat five, and for infotainment, it uses a touch screen interface that can’t multitask terribly well and is annoyingly slow to respond to inputs. That said, the seats are wonderful (as they are in the Bimmer, to be fair), and Rover’s boxy interior design is quite regal and British in character. By contrast, the X5’s cabin is modern and sleek – but its business-like sterility can also work against it. In terms of luxury and style, this contest is a draw. Deciding between these luxury sport utilities comes down to an emotional connection to the vehicle. After all, that’s something a person ought to have when plunking down $60K—$100K for a vehicle. Did we find ourselves more excited about hopping into the cool and functional X5, or the character-rich Range Rover Sport? In terms of overall character, the Range Rover Sport is the winner. 2015 Lexus NX vs. 2015 Audi Q5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoIx3NqZ1zk 2014 Audi Q5 vs. 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK 250 BlueTEC http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c98GbcfHa1E 2015 Range Rover Sport vs. 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee 2015 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2014 AUDİ Q5 vs. 2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvFuYpAWP2I 2014 Infiniti QX70 2014 Porsche Cayenne





1/4 mile: Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano, Nissan GT-R R800, Mercedes SL65 AMG, Evolution ARS
Moscow Street Racing Results: http://www.dragtimes.info





BMW X5 vs JEEP Grand Cherokee





GTR vs X5M.AVI
GTR vs X5M stok





Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?




Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

2005 Ford GT Twin Turbo Supercharged Nitrous M2K Motorsports: 9.501 @ 152.490
M2K Motorsports, Engine: 5.4L V8 Supercharged and Twin Turbo, Supercharger: M2K Motorsports Turbos: M2K Motorsports


2005 Ford GT Supercharged Twin Turbo Nitrous: 9.721 @ 149.840
Mullet, Engine: 5.4L Supercharged Twin Turbo V8, Tires: 305/35/19 ET Streets


2005 Ford GT Twin Turbo Supercharged: 10.270 @ 146.480
Mullet, Engine: V8 Supercharged and Turbocharged,


2005 Ford GT Twin Turbo: 10.480 @ 144.950
moeinox, Engine: V8 Twin Turbo, Tires: drag radials


2005 Ford GT Pulley, Tune, Exhaust: 10.636 @ 132.210
FikseGTS, Engine: 5.4L Supercharged V8, Tires: Bridgestone Potenza RE050A


2005 Ford GT Pulley and Tune: 10.637 @ 133.210
typeshatch, Engine: V8 Supercharged 5.4L, Supercharger: Pulley 2.75 Tires: drag radials


2005 Ford GT PPR Twin Turbo: 10.650 @ 155.310
PPR, Engine: V8 Twin Turbo,


2005 Ford GT Heffner Tune Pulley: 10.696 @ 135.270
Jamie, Tires: stock factory tires


2005 Ford GT : 10.920 @ 128.000
NA,


2005 Ford GT Ford Racing Pulley and Tune: 10.920 @ 130.230
hmg_57, Engine: Supercharged V8, Supercharger: Ford Pulley Tires: 18


2005 Ford GT : 11.020 @ 130.000
NA,


2005 Ford GT Heffner Twin Turbo: 11.101 @ 139.020
NA, Engine: V8 DOHC 32 Valve Twin Turbo, Turbos: Twin Water Cooled Dual Ball Bearing 61mm Turbos


2005 Ford GT : 11.200 @ 131.200
NA,


2005 Ford GT : 11.200 @ 131.200
NA,


2005 Ford GT Heffner Pulley and Tune: 11.203 @ 132.370
FikseGTS, Engine: V8 Supercharged 5.4L, Supercharger: Heffner Pulley, 2.75 Tires: Bridgestone Potenza RE050A


2005 Ford GT : 11.410 @ 124.910
12secyoto, Engine: V8 Supercharged: 550HP,


2005 Ford GT : 11.540 @ 126.050
Jamie Furman,


2005 Ford GT : 11.600 @ 126.200
NA,


2005 Ford GT : 11.770 @ 126.530
GTF, Engine: V8 Supercharged: 550HP,


2005 Ford GT : 11.780 @ 124.310
NA, Engine: Supercharged 90* V-8, aluminum block/heads, Tires: 235/45ZR18; 315/40ZR19,Goodyear Eagle F1 Supercar


 


©2015 DragTimes - Disclaimer - Contact Us