Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

1982 camaro z28 seafoam

seafoaming my 1982 z228 Camaro. its got a stock 305 but that will be soon changed


 


More Videos...


Glance at a 1984 Z28 / Test drive.
My Camaro Z28 from 1984, 350ci GM Goodwrench crate engine with Comp Cams 268H camshaft, T5 transmission. Filmed in France, in 25 fps interlaced mode. New Spot ManCamaro : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3MjZ41jJTQ





Camaro Z28 Flowmaster vs Cutout
1982 Camaro z28 with electric cut out! 20inch rims nd a bumping system must see!





1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 2 Owner Iroc v8 Classic $2500
This is a very nice 83 Chevy Camaro Z-28 V8 Rally wheels etc. You are going to love this car it is a 2 Owner car and has been very well taken care of it will need a little here and there but right now ust hop in and drive it this car is ready to go and youll be hard pressed to find one in this shape for this kind of money. make sure and check out my other videos on my Channel and Subscribe i am always getting in all sorts of unique and Interesting Classic, Muscle and EURO cars also you can check out my Web site at www.Cerealmarshmallows.com Click on Blog to see alot of my cars Nathan Wratislaw 406 544 6919





My Camaro Loves Sea Foam
So there I am walking through Walmart in a zombie daze when I find myself in the automotive aisle. I begin reading all the labels on the different 'Motor Treatment' products, but one stands out. Sea Foam, in it's nondescript can, claims to reduce or eliminate engine ticks and pings while removing carbon, gum, and buildup from high-mileage engines. I was understandably skeptical, since this miracle in a can only cost $6.00. After I got home, I did a little post-sale research on YouTube. To my surprise, there are hundreds of videos praising this product. Anyway, the next day I warmed the engine and per instructions, disconnected the Brake Booster Vacuum Line and SLOWLY fed the Sea Foam into the line. The engine nearly stalled several times, but overall took it very well. I confirmed my suspicion of an Exhaust manifold leak when the fog began pouring from the left of the engine. I shut the engine off and let it sit for 30 minutes before starting the camera and engine. You see the results. The results were nothing short of immediate and unbelievable. Not only did the engine idle 300% smoother, but the ticking was nearly inaudible and the throttle response was both powerful and instant. Now, I know I am supposed to drive it like I stole it for about ten miles after the treatment, but as you can see, I don't yet have a plate or tags, or insurance, so that will have to wait. Long story short. I LOVE SEA FOAM!!!!





G92 Camaro IROC-Z vs LT1 Camaro Z28
1990 G92 optioned TPI 5.0 liter 5-speed Camaro IROC-Z and 1993 LT1 powered Camaro Z28 5.7 liter automatic messing around on the street... --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- -1990 Camaro IROC-Z 5.0 TPI 5spd, DX3-code decal-stripe delete, G92-code performance package, factory GU6-code 3.42 gears, factory N10-code high flow Exhaust w/ addition of Edelbrock headers, Flowmaster cat-back, SLP runners, underdrive pulley, 24lb injectors, Lakewood control arms, adjustable pan-hard rod... -1993 Camaro Z28 LT1 5.7 liter automatic, K&N FIPK cold air kit, throttle body air-foil, custom chip, factory 2.73 gears... --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- Most car guys don't know much about the 5.0 G92 5-speed cars from 90-92, with 230hp from the factory, 5-speed tranny and 3.42 gears, these 3rd Gen F-body sleepers gave 5.0 Mustangs absolute hell. In 1990 the G92 option code became a full performance package rather than simply a rear axle option as in previous model years... GM also offered an answer to the Saleen Mustangs by way of option 1LE, which consisted of the G92 optioned without A/C and other creature comforts, and the addition of Corvette brakes and other road racing equipment. About the only way an IROC-Z Camaro could take out a 5.0L Mustang from this era was with the Tuned Port Induction and addition of these performance options: G92, 1LE, L98 or B4C. The TBI powered Camaro were not even in the same league as the performance version TPI Camaro, or 5.0 Mustang, these 170hp TBI models were GM's economy de-tuned versions and were around 50-60 less horsepower versus the performance optioned TPI models. These non-performing models gave the 3rd Gen F-bodies a bad reputation back in those days... many think that these were the example of 3rd Gen F-bodies, when in fact, and unlike Ford, GM offered many models, with many versions of the 5.0 and 5.7 liter engines, many camshaft designs and many rear-gear ratios... For more info on the rare G92 and ultra rare 1LE optioned Camaro & Firebird, check out http://nedacfilms.hubpages.com/hub/Camaro-VS-Mustang-Revisited Produced by John (Trae) King @ nedaCFilms with intro music produced and performed by Kevin "The Axe Murderer" Kent & Burn the Earth.





Rat Rod vs Lamborghini Aventador! Roadkill Episode 5
On this episode of Roadkill, HOT ROD's David Freiburger and Mike Finnegan spend 24 crazy hours with a 1930 Model A Rat Rod and a 2012 Lamborghini Aventador to find out which wildly impractical, larger-than-life car attracts the most attention. Roadkill appears every fourth Friday on the new Motor Trend channel. http://www.youtube.com/motortrend Subscribe now to make sure you're in on all the action! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=motortrend Facebook - http://facebook.com/motortrendmag & http://facebook.com/hotrodmag Twitter - http://twitter.com/motortrend Google+ - https://plus.google.com/101867967859016552744/posts Website - http://www.motortrend.com & http://www.hotrod.com





1984 Z28 Camaro Project Car
My dad's 1984 Chevrolet Z28 Camaro. I no longer plan to restore and use this car as a daily driver. I will be buying an older pickup truck and will restore it and I will upload videos of the restoration process of it. I will restore this car at a later time. Fuel economy plays a big role in this decision and I really would like something that already runs and doesn't have 200k miles and that gets better than 8 to 10 mpg and doesn't have rust holes everywhere. I have been finding more and more big problems with this car than I first thought there were and it is cheeper for me to get a more practical and a bit better on gas. I hope this doesn't dissapoint anyone and I hope you guys enjoy the videos to come! Shout out to gearheadAbe Keep up the good videos!





3rd Gen Camaro - Fox-Body Mustang (the good, bad and the ugly)
Most car guys don't know the difference between the 230hp G92 optioned models, or the 5-speed and automatic models, or the 170hp lackluster TBI versions (not to be confused with TPI versions)... Mustang guys smoke the 170hp TBI models, as well as the "run of the mill" TPI automatic models, and believe they can do this to any and all. Well, not all 3rd Gen F-bodies are created equal. Optioned from the factory with the 230hp TPI (not TBI) engine, manual 5-speed tranny and 3.42 gears, these 3rd Gen F-body sleepers gave 5.0 Mustangs absolute hell. In 1990 the G92 option code became a full performance package rather than simply a rear axle option as in previous model years... GM also offered an answer to the Saleen Mustangs by way of option 1LE, which consisted of the G92 optioned without A/C and other creature comforts, and the addition of Corvette brakes and other road racing equipment. About the only way an IROC-Z Camaro could take out a 5.0L Mustang from this era was with the Tuned Port Induction and addition of these performance options: G92, 1LE, L98 or B4C. The TBI powered Camaro were not at all in the same league as the performance version TPI Camaro, or 5.0 Mustang, these 170hp TBI models were GM's economy de-tuned versions and were around 50-60 less horsepower versus the performance optioned TPI models. These non-performing models gave the 3rd Gen F-bodies a bad rep on the street... many think that these were the example of 3rd Gen F-bodies, when in fact, and unlike Ford, GM offered many models, with many engines, camshafts and rear-gear ratios... For more info on these rare optioned Camaro & Firebird, check out my website http://www.streetshowdriftdrags.com/Camaro.html or the Mustang guys can check out http://www.Mustang-Town.com Produced by John (Trae) King @ nedaCFilms For more details on the G92-optioned F-Bodies, check out: http://nedacfilms.hubpages.com/hub/Camaro-VS-Mustang-Revisited





Corvette Seafoam
LS1 motor.. smokey..





1982 Z28 - My First Project
This is an older video that I made when I was 16/17 when we first put everything together. Things have changed a little bit, and I will post video of the car soon.





LS1 Third Gen Camaro Z28 LS1 Swap Comp Cam
This is my 85 z28 with a LS1 in it. We just finished this car and this was after the first drive. This is before we tuned the car. This car has original paint and interior! This is a LS1 with 241 heads and LS6 intake. Cam: comp cam 275hr





1985 Camaro z28 5L that i am working on
a look at my 85 Camaro that im working on .





OutLawRacer - 1982 Camaro berlinetta rev up, engine's about dead
Heres my 1982 Camaro Berlinetta reving up, its a 383 small block, turbo350 trans, Dyno'd at 510hp engine. 423hp wheels. "2 leaking valves"/ piston 7 acting up bad





305 HO all original
Let us know. Aircleaner flipped over or not. Be sure to let us know in comments below.





1982 Camaro burnout
307 SBC with a th350




Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?





Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1999 Chevrolet Camaro TAFC: 5.625 @ 256.060
Jimmy Jones, Engine: TFX, Supercharger: PSI Tires: Goodyear


1968 Chevrolet Camaro rs: 6.150 @ 224.880
Shannon Jenkins, Engine: 748 Cheverolet, Tires: goodyear


1999 Chevrolet Camaro pro modified: 6.321 @ 232.780
Jordan S. Comilang, Engine: Kieth Black 527, Supercharger: Weiand 1471 Tires: Goodyear Eagles


1991 Chevrolet Camaro nitro coupe: 6.321 @ 225.670
tommy howes, Engine: blown 526, Supercharger: 1471


1996 Chevrolet Camaro : 6.440 @ 221.080
TJ Stewart,


1969 Chevrolet Camaro SS 641 Blown Pro: 6.740 @ 220.700
Nick D'Amico, Engine: 641 Blown Pro Kill, Supercharger: a bigger one Turbos: n/a


1997 Chevrolet Camaro Z28: 6.900 @ 196.000
jeff fleming, Engine: 819 CI, Supercharger: no Turbos: no


1990 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28: 6.959 @ 195.620
Marvin Blaney, Engine: Blaney's Competition,


1979 Chevrolet Camaro Z 28: 7.025 @ 210.000
Zoltan Kohari, Engine: Pat Musi Dart Big M Block, Supercharger: 14-71 Little field Tires: 34.5/17.0-16


1968 Chevrolet Camaro SS: 7.050 @ 198.000
GREG CASON, Engine: 565,


1967 Chevrolet Camaro Pro-Street: 7.470 @ 192.000
Dale L Collins Jr, Engine: 540, Turbos: 106 Precision Tires: Mickey Thompson


1968 Chevrolet Camaro RS: 7.470 @ 179.000
Ken Staib, Engine: 532 in. big block, Tires: M.T. 33 x10.5W


2002 Chevrolet Camaro bickel: 7.520 @ 175.300
Steve Tiona, Engine: 588 cid, Tires: 17x15x33


1989 Chevrolet Camaro Z28: 7.561 @ 189.000
Steve Toppe, Engine: 615, Tires: 33.5x17


1967 Chevrolet Camaro ss632: 7.860 @ 165.800
Thomas Coffman, Engine: 632, Supercharger: none Turbos: none Tires: 33x17x15 goodyear


1992 Chevrolet Camaro : 7.936 @ 172.210
Todd, Engine: 548 BBC,


1978 Chevrolet Camaro Z28: 7.970 @ 176.000
Aldo Aka Junior, Engine: 572ci, Tires: Goodyear


1990 Chevrolet Camaro : 8.220 @ 165.000
JCE, Engine: 468 small block chevy, Tires: 10.5 W


1978 Chevrolet Camaro z-28: 8.280 @ 160.000
john begglry, Engine: 565, Tires: goodyear


1987 Chevrolet Camaro : 8.300 @ 165.000
Jamie Oxendine, Engine: 540cu chevy, Supercharger: none Turbos: none Tires: 33.5/15/15


 


©2014 DragTimes - Disclaimer