Crash Test 2000 - 2005 (Discontinued) Dodge Neon (Front) IIHS

Dodge Neon 2000-05 models results also apply to: 2003-05 Dodge SRT-4 | 2000-01 Plymouth Neon FRONTAL OFFSET TEST OVERALL EVALUATION: Marginal Structure/safety cage Injury measures Restraints/dummy kinematics Head/neck Chest Leg/foot, left Leg/foot, right Marginal Good Good Poor Acceptable Marginal Important: Frontal crash test ratings can be compared only among vehicles of similar weight. Test details: The Dodge and Plymouth Neon were redesigned for the 2000 model year. The Plymouth Neon was dropped after the 2001 model year, and the high-performance Dodge SRT-4 model was added in the 2003 model year. Both the Dodge Neon and SRT-4 were dropped after the 2005 model year. Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement wasn't well controlled. As the dummy moved into the airbag, it also moved toward the driver door, which had bowed outward, and its head approached but didn't hit the window sill. There was too much rearward movement of the steering column, and during the impact the steering wheel broke off from the column. Injury measures — Measures taken from the head, neck, and chest indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity. Forces on the left femur indicate that injuries to the upper leg would be likely. Forces on both tibias indicate that injuries to lower legs would be possible.

More Videos...


2005 Dodge Neon side IIHS crash test
2005 Dodge Neon without optional side airbags 31 mph side IIHS crash test Overall evaluation: Poor Full rating at http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=284





Car Crash & Accidents Tests - Chevrolet Nissan Mazda Fiat & More
Videos of car crash and accidents tests related to Chevrolet Volt, Mini Cooper, Fiat 500, Nissan Juke and Leaf, Mazda 5. Chevrolet Volt - 2014 TOP SAFETY PICK +, Small overlap crash test rating: ACCEPTABLE; Mini Cooper Countryman - 2014 TOP SAFETY PICK, Small overlap crash test rating: GOOD; Fiat 500L, Small overlap crash test rating: POOR; Nissan Juke, Small overlap crash test rating: POOR; Nissan Leaf, Small overlap crash test rating: MARGINAL; Mazda 5, Small overalp crash test rating: POOR; Mazda 5 - Side impact test with deformable barrier moving 31 mph, Side test rating: MARGINAL, The Mazda 5 is the only 2014 model car to earn anything less than acceptable in the side test





1959 Chevrolet Bel Air vs. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu IIHS crash test
IIHS 50th anniversary demonstration test • September 9, 2009 In the 50 years since US insurers organized the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, car crashworthiness has improved. Demonstrating this was a crash test conducted between a 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air and a 2009 Chevrolet Malibu. In a real-world collision similar to this test, occupants of the new model would fare much better than in the vintage Chevy. "It was night and day, the difference in occupant protection," says Institute president Adrian Lund. "What this test shows is that automakers don't build cars like they used to. They build them better." The crash test was conducted at an event to celebrate the contributions of auto insurers to highway safety progress over 50 years. Beginning with the Institute's 1959 founding, insurers have maintained the resolve, articulated in the 1950s, to "conduct, sponsor, and encourage programs designed to aid in the conservation and preservation of life and property from the hazards of highway accidents." More information at http://www.iihs.org





Crash Test Car IIHS + FAIL: WORST CRASHES EVER
DEADLY CRASHES - WORST Crash Test Car IIHS: This crash tests iihs is one of the worst crash test. New crash tests: Underride guards on most big rigs leave passenger vehicle occupants at risk in certain crashes DEADLY Crashes - IIHS Crash Tests Accident Car DEADLY Сбои: IIHS краш-тестов ÖLÜMCÜL Çöküyor: IIHS Crash Testleri Modern semitrailers for the most part do a good job of keeping passenger vehicles from sliding underneath them, greatly increasing the chances of surviving a crash into the back of a large truck, recent tests by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) show. But in crashes involving only a small portion of the truck's rear, most trailers fail to prevent potentially deadly underride. Most semitrailers are required to have underride guards. These are steel bars that hang from the backs of trailers to prevent the front of a passenger vehicle from moving underneath during a crash. Earlier research showed that the minimum strength and dimensions required for underride guards are inadequate, prompting the Institute to petition the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in 2011 for tougher standards. The Institute also asked the agency to consider applying the standards to other types of large trucks such as dump trucks that aren't required to have any underride guards. Although NHTSA hasn't responded yet, trailer manufacturers already are installing guards that are much stronger than the agency requires. These guards generally work well to prevent underride, except in crashes occurring at the outer edges of trailers, the crash tests show. One likely reason manufacturers are installing guards that are stronger than required is a tougher standard that trailers in Canada have had to meet since 2007. More recently, IIHS crash tests have drawn attention to the issue, and at least one manufacturer has started selling a trailer with an improved underride guard since the tests began. To see how well the latest guards work, IIHS engineers put trailers from the eight largest manufacturers through a series of progressively tougher crash tests. All of the trailers had underride guards that met both U.S. and Canadian standards. Both standards require a guard to withstand a certain amount of force at various points. Under the Canadian regulation, a guard must withstand about twice as much force as required by the U.S. rule at the point where it attaches to its vertical support. In each crash test, a 2010 Chevrolet Malibu (but also rolls royce crash test) struck a parked truck at 35 mph. In the first scenario, the car was aimed at the center of the trailer. All eight guards successfully prevented underride, including one from Hyundai Translead, whose previous model failed a full-width test by IIHS. In the second test, in which only half the width of the car overlapped with the trailer, all but one trailer passed. However, when the overlap was reduced to 30 percent, every trailer except one from the Canadian manufacturer Manac failed. Manac sells dry van trailers in the U.S. under the name Trailmobile. The Institute uses a 30 percent overlap for the most challenging underride test because it is the minimum overlap under which a passenger vehicle occupant's head is likely to strike a trailer if an underride guard fails. ►IF YOU LOVE CARS, YOU SHOULD SUBSCRIBE NOW TO GOMMEBLOG’S CHANNEL ►►► http://bit.ly/12ULPud ►SE AMI LE AUTO .. NON PERDERTI TUTTI I NUOVI VIDEO. ISCRIVITI ADESSO ►►► http://bit.ly/12ULPud ►Google +: https://plus.google.com/101792401712738693835/ ►Facebook: http://facebook.com/gommeblog ►Twitter: https://twitter.com/gommeblog ►Website: http://www.gommeblog.it ►Gommeblog.it: CAR CHANNEL. Videos about Cars, Video Motorbikes, News, Test Auto & Motos, Test Drive, Video Reviews, Motorsport News and Track Lap. News About the Most important Cars and Motorbikes Bands like Ferrari, Lamborghini, Audi, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Porsche, Koenigsegg, Bugatti, Ducati, Yamaha, Kawasaki .... ►THANKS for taking the time to visit, I hope you SUBSCRIBE and enjoy the upcoming videos!




Follow