Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

SRT8s Jeep Srt8 con Nitro vs. Mustang Supercharged y Nitro

Gano la Cherokee por 1/2 carro


 


More Videos...


SRT8s Cherokee Srt8 con Nitro vs. Lightning Supercharged y Nitro
Sin palabras!!





2015 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat: Almost Everything You Ever Wanted to Know
( http://www.TFLcar.com ) The 2015 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat with the new supercharged 6.2L engine will burn rubber all day long. But what makes this classic American car so new and special. In another interesting and informative TFLcar video we tell you almost everything you ever wanted to know about the new HEMI 2015 Dodge Challenger SRT HEMI Hellcat. Facebook: ( https://www.facebook.com/tflcar ) Twitter: ( https://www.twitter.com/tflcar ) and now even Truck Videos on YouTube at: The Fast Lane Truck ( http://www.youtube.com/user/tflcar ) and classic cars as well at: TFLClassics ( http://www.youtube.com/user/ClassicsUnleashed )





Fastest NA SRT 8 Jeep Cherokee vs Big Block Camaro - Wheelstand - Drag Race Video -- Road Test TV
http://www.RoadTestTV.com World's Fastest Naturally Aspirated Grand Cherokee SRT8 does a wheelstand and puts it on the bumper during this 10.49 @ 123 mph 1/4 mile pass. This bad Jeep SRT 8 has a LPM stroked 440 cubic inch Hemi that puts down 650 horsepower to the wheels and has been converted from 4 wheel drive to 2 wheel drive.





Jeep SRT8 vs. BMW E46 M3
Facebook: http://on.fb.me/RHPage Twitter: http://bit.ly/RHTweets (MORE...) Bone stock Jeep SRT-8 vs. 2003 BMW e46 M3 with billy boat (b&b) Exhaust from roll. Location: Mexico, just east of Cozumel ****************************************************** FOLLOW ME PHOTOS: http://razzi.me/Robert/photos FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/RobertsCarChannel TWITTER: http://www.twitter.com/roberthimler ******************************************************





426 TECHCO SUPERCHARGED JEEP SRT8
426 TECHCO SUPERCHARGED JEEP SRT8 ONLY 5.5 LBS OF Boost..THIS IS NOT MY JEEP. ITS FOR MUELLGE!... http://www.youtube.com/user/muellge





Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8 (13.1 @ 102) against a Camaro SS
Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8 owned by Anthony Wheelus.





Jeep SRT8 vs ML 63 AMG from inside the ML 63 AMG
Jeep SRT8 vs ML 63 AMG from inside the ML 63 AMG THIS VIDEO IS PROPERTY OF rtmill & RockSoccer90





98 Jeep Grand Cherokee 5.2 vs BMW X5 4.4i
98 Grand Cherokee modded 5.2 vs BMW X5 4.4i v8 from 0-110mph and 60-108mph.





mustang vs srt8
mustan supercargado vs cherokee srt8





Jeep SRT600 vs McLaren SLR (402m)
Jeep SRT600 vs McLaren SLR from 0km





Jeep SRT-8 Supercharged--Chicago Cars Direct
Test drive of a 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT 8 with a SUPERCHARGED 6.1 Hemi V8 producing 575 horsepower from Chicago Cars Direct. Without question, the Jeep is the hottest rod here. Although the two have fairly similar power-to-weight ratios (11.4 pounds per horsepower for the Jeep, 12.3 for the Chevy), the Jeep easily outruns the SS. This thing explodes when you jump on the gas. The four-wheel-drive system routes the majority of the engine's power to the rear wheels while cruising, and a clutch in the center differential can reroute power to the front wheels if the system detects that the rears are losing traction. Hit the gas, and after a barely audible chirp from the rear tires, the Jeep hurtles forward. From rest to 60 mph takes only 4.5 seconds, which is about as quick as a BMW M3 and a second quicker than the SS. The Jeep passes 100 mph in 12.0 seconds, 2.6 seconds sooner than the Chevy. Part of the Jeep's acceleration advantage comes from the quick-shifting transmission. It has a manumatic feature that allows manual gear selection, but the automatic mode worked so well that we mostly relied on it. Upshifts and downshifts are quick and much smoother than the Chevy's. As a smack-you-into-the-seat machine, the Jeep's got a definite edge. It also handles fairly well. We're talking about a 4794-pound sport-ute with a decidedly unsportingly high center of gravity, but it's crisper in the curves than you'd think. On the skidpad, its 0.88 g outperformed the Chevy's 0.81-g score. The SRT8 would have performed better in the lane-change test, but its stability-control system can't be completely disabled. In normal mode, the system clamps down at the slightest slide. Hitting the "off" button allows a little more sliding, but it still intervenes enough that it slowed us down in the lane change. But in the real world, the stability system wasn't a bother. In fact, this truck is fun in the twisties. Although we didn't put it on the clock as we zipped around our well-traveled handling loop, the Jeep didn't feel much slower than the high-powered sports cars we usually pick for this particular group of back roads. We could carry a lot of speed in the corners. The Jeep doesn't lean much, but you never lose the feeling that you're sitting high in the air. Thankfully, the brakes are terrific. The pedal has a reassuringly firm feel that's a relief to encounter at the end of a high-speed straight, and the brakes felt up to the task of repeatedly slowing the nearly 2.5-ton brute. We liked the steering, too, which has a tight feel to it. After a few miles of spirited driving, you forget you're in a truck. The responses are sports-car quick, and you drive this Grand Cherokee like you would any other performance car. For example, in one tricky corner we used the brakes to bring the nose down to the corner apex and then squeezed the gas for a quick shot down the following short straight. The choreography was straight out of racing school. That handling precision, however, comes with a stiff ride. The Grand Cherokee swallows large impacts well enough, but humps in the road set the chassis into a harsh up-and-down motion that could bring on nausea. Maybe we're getting soft, but it's uncomfortable enough that we wouldn't want to endure the ride on a daily basis. In the ride category, we gave the Jeep an eight and the Chevy a nine. Besides the ride, the Jeep also lost points in the utility department. That 3500-pound towing capacity cost it three points, and there's the interior, which is small compared with the Chevy's. The back seats are tighter, and the rear-seat cushion is too low. In rear-seat comfort, the Jeep got four points to the Chevy's five. Plus, the Jeep can't carry as much stuff. With the seats folded, the SRT8 offers 67 cubic feet of space versus 80 in the SS. Those deficiencies cost the Jeep first place, but it lost by only two measly points. We loved the V-8 rumble and fantastic thrust, but it's still a truck, and we expect more utility. Sure, it looks great and is loads of fun, but you can get that with plenty of cars — a Dodge Charger SRT8, for one.





Jeep Cherokee SRT-8 vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo
Moscow Unlim 500+ Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT-8 vs Porsche Cayenne turbo Evotech www.dragtimes.info





srt8 jeep , svt cobra , and supra playin around
99 Mustang svt cobra , 08 jeep srt8, 95 toyota supra ( twin turbo)





Bugatti Veyron vs BMW M3
An airstrip drag race between a Bugatti Veyron and Dutch racing driver Ho-Pin Tung in a new E92 M3. View the original on: http://www.autojunk.nl/2007/09/bugatti-Veyron-vs-bmw-m3 Welcome to our Autoblogger channel! Follow us on twitter: http://twitter.com/autoblog ENGLISH: We bring you the best reviews of the most interesting cars. Since september '10 we also had our own carshow on Dutch television. Subscribe to us for the latest models and reviews! Several cars which are shown and reviewed in our video's: Audi R8, Ferrari 458, Ferrari 599 GTB, Ferrari California, Lamborghini Gallardo, Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder, Bugatti Veyron, BMW M3 E92, BMW M5 F10, Audi RS4, Audi RS6, Mercedes SLS, Mercedes SLR McLaren, Mercedes C63, Mercedes E63 AMG, Porsche 959, Porsche Carrera GT, Porsche 911 (991 and 997), Porsche Cayenne GTS, Porsche Panamera, Aston Martin DBS, Aston Martin V8 vantage, Aston Martin V12 Vantage, Corvette ZR1, Tesla Model S, Nissan GT-R, Spyker C8 Laviolette, Alfa Romeo 4C, Alfa Romeo 8C, Alfa Giuilietta QV, Ford Focus RS500 and many many more! For suggestions or ideas, please sent an email to tips@autoblog.nl





Most Muscle? Camaro SS v Challenger SRT8 v Shelby GT500
2010 Camaro SS vs. 2009 Challenger SRT8 vs. 2010 Shelby GT500 http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/Comparos/articleId=154386 Camaro v Mustang v Challenger: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=as2erdrkQbI Hennessey Camaro v Shelby GT500: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwCFIk0xH_s More Articles: http://www.insideline.com Car Prices & Info: http://www.edmunds.com Twitter Feed: http://twitter.com Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/ins... Hi-Res Videos: http://www.hulu.com/edmunds-in side-line In our recent pony car comparison test, the retro-heavy — and just plain heavy — 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS walked away with top honors in its debut. The big V8-powered coupe needed a new challenge. It was time to refocus the lens. Shoot from a different angle, so to speak. So we squared the brooding visage of our SS-badged protagonist up against the cruelest bunch of savages we could find, the range-topping 2009 Dodge Challenger SRT8 and 2010 Ford Shelby GT500.




Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?





Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1969 Ford Mustang : 6.860 @ 204.000
Bill Sexton, Engine: 712ci Pontiac built by Sonny Leonard,


1969 Ford Mustang : 7.170 @ 177.000
CARL EPPLE, Engine: 572CI SVO 460, Tires: 33X10.5W MICKY THOMP


1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1: 7.670 @ 178.210
Phil Manquen - Walt Drakeford, Engine: 602 CI, Tires: 10.5


1987 Ford Mustang Turbo: 7.816 @ 180.800
Brad, Engine: 347CI, Turbos: Precision 98.5mm Tires: 28 x 10.5 MTs


1995 Ford Mustang Cobra: 7.889 @ 197.360
Jim Mills, Engine: 427 Windsor, Turbos: Twin GT47-88 Tires: M/T 325/50/15 Radials


2007 Ford Mustang Super GT500 Twin Turbo: 7.890 @ 175.220
EV, Engine: Built 5.4L Aluminum Engine, Turbos: Twin 67mm Precision Turbos


1989 Ford Mustang lx: 7.930 @ 172.300
jorge fretts, Engine: 598, Tires: 33x10.5w


1989 Ford Mustang LX Hatchback 10.5 tire: 8.000 @ 170.000
Marshall Hancock, Engine: 572 ci, Supercharger: n/a Turbos: n/a Tires: M/T


1986 Ford Mustang THE STAMPEEDE BANDIT: 8.013 @ 170.033
Larry Gotreaux, Engine: BBF-ELIMINATOR-460-605ci, by Tims Engines, Denham Springs,, Supercharger: N/A Turbos: N/A Tires: 27x15 GY & 33.5x17x15W-GY-D1


1993 Ford Mustang LX: 8.390 @ 167.870
Lee Howie, Engine: Bennett, Turbos: 1 Precision PT90 Tires: DOT


1987 Ford Mustang coupe: 8.400 @ 162.370
Todd, Engine: 385ci,


1989 Ford Mustang coupe: 8.420 @ 167.000
Ryan Ellington, Engine: sbc 434, Tires: mt 275/60/15 drag radial


1991 Ford Mustang GT: 8.520 @ 172.700
PRO LARRY, Engine: 351W, Supercharger: NA Turbos: NA Tires: NA


1990 Ford Mustang GT: 8.527 @ 172.300
PRO LARRY AND BRANDON G.T, Engine: 351W, Tires: 10.5 SLICK'S


1993 Ford Mustang Cobra 363 Nitrous: 8.541 @ 152.870
CJ Williams, Engine: 363,


2006 Ford Mustang GT: 8.579 @ 158.780
Paul Fercho, Engine: 572 CID big block ford, Supercharger: none Turbos: none Tires: M/T 29.5X10.5WX15 Slicks


1985 Ford Mustang lx: 8.600 @ 159.000
mike pritchard, Engine: 537ci, Tires: 30x13.50 et streets


1990 Ford Mustang LX Coupe: 8.780 @ 154.000
Clint Lynch, Engine: 418 windsor, Tires: 28x10.5


1991 Ford Mustang Turbo: 8.800 @ 161.000
Mike, Engine: 306CI, Turbos: Air Research 91mm Tires: 28X13.5X15 ET STREETS.


1985 Ford Mustang GT coupe: 8.860 @ 154.000
James Cudse, Engine: 358 W, Supercharger: Paxton Novi 2000 Tires: skinnies, Hoosier 14.5x28


 


©2014 DragTimes - Disclaimer