The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection for the knees and femurs of both the driver and front passenger dummies and Chevrolet showed that a similar level of protection would be offered to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different seating positions. The Aveo scored maximum points in the side barrier test, all body regions being well protected. Even in the more severe pole test, the chest was adequately protected. The seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.
Maximum points were scored in the dynamic tests for the protection of the 3 year infant. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded by Euro NCAP. Permanently attached labels also provide clear warnings that the passenger airbag should be disabled before a rearward facing child seat can be used in that position.
► 2012 Chevy Sonic makes a bungee jump!
When Chevrolet decided to launch the all-new Sonic in the States, it seems
they took the word 'launch' a little too seriously.
On the back of research that showed extreme sports to be highly popular
within the car's 18-30 target customer range, the company decided to make
quite an impact by throwing a car from the top of a ten storey tower in
Long Beach, California.
Well, we say impact. But just before it plummeted to the ground, the
all-new Aveo dipped its nose in a paddling pool and bounced back up in an
incredible display of non-contact automotive bungee-jumping.
The stunt was performed as part of Chevrolet's 'Let's do this' marketing
campaign in the USA.
The Bungee Jump is the second extreme sport in which the Aveo has
participated. Last month, the car was launched more quickly than any car in
history -- accelerating from 0-60mph in just 0.4 seconds as it was pushed
out of an aeroplane, to perform its first freefall skydive.
2012 Hyundai i40 CRASH TEST
The passenger compartment of the i40 remained stable in the frontal impact.
A driver knee airbag is standard equipment and dummy readings indicated
good protection of the knees, femurs and pelvis for both front seat
occupants. The steering column was considered a potential risk but Hyundai
demonstrated that other parts of the facia offered good protection. The i40
scored maximum points in the side barrier test and provided adequate chest
protection in the more severe side pole impact. The seat and head restraint
provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a
Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint,
was not excessive and both the 3 year and the 18 month dummies were
properly contained in the side impact test. The front passenger airbag can
be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating
position and the i40 provides clear information to the driver regarding the
status of the airbag. A permanently attached label gives a clear warning of
the dangers of using a rearward facing seat in the passenger seat without
first disabling the airbag.
2011 BMW X3 CRASH TEST
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy
readings indicated good protection for the knees and femurs of both the
driver and front passenger dummies and BMW showed that a similar level of
protection would be offered to occupants of different sizes and to those
sat in different seating positions. The X3 scored maximum points for the
protection it provided in the side barrier test. In the more severe side
pole impact, protection of the chest was weak. The front seat and head
restraint provided marginal protection against whiplash injuries in a
Based on dummy readings in the frontal and side impact tests, the X3 scored
maximum points for protection of the 3 year child and lost only a fraction
of a point for the 18 month old child. Althought the passenger airbag can
be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that
seating position, insufficient information is provided to the driver
regarding the status of the airbag preventing any reward for the system.
Permanently attached labels on the sun visor clearly warn of the dangers of
using a rearward facing child seat in that position without first disabling
2012 Chevrolet Captiva CRASH TEST
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy
readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs. Chevrolet
showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of
different sizes and those sat in different positions. All body areas were
well protected in the side barrier test and the car scored maximum points
in this test. In the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of rib
compression indiciated marginal protection of the chest area. The front
seats and head restraints provided marginal protection against whiplash
injuries in the event of a rear end collision.
Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint,
was not excessive. In the side barrier test, both child dummies were
properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising
the likelihood of dangerous head contacts. The passenger airbag can be
disabled by means of a switch, allowing a rearward facing child restraint
to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the
driver regarding the status of the airbag is not clear and the system was
not rewarded. Clear warnings are given of the dangers of using a rearward
facing restraint in that seat without first disabling the airbag.
The front edge of the bonnet provided uniformly poor protection to
pedestrians. In most areas likely to be struck by a child's head, the
bonnet provided good protection. However, predominantly poor protection was
provided in those areas likely to be struck by and adult's head.
Electronic stability control is standard equipment, as is a seatbelt
reminder for the driver and front passenger seats. A speed limitiation
device is not available.
TOP 10 WORST CRASH TESTS
Thanks For Watching! Make Sure You Leave A Like!
And Make Sure You Subscribe To Me And Others!
Mr Geoclay :
Hi!, It's Regan :
exL Aquas :
Make Sure You Like My friends Facebook Page:
2011 Chevrolet Aveo roadtest (english subtitled)
Groot zijn de aantallen niet voor Chevrolet in Nederland. Met de Cruze
hoopte het Koreaanse merk potten te kunnen breken in het C-segment, maar
daar is vooralsnog weinig van terecht gekomen. Het is nu de beurt aan de
Aveo om types als de Fiesta, Punto en Fabia te beconcurreren. Is hij tegen
de concurrentie opgewassen? We gaan rijden.
2013 Chevrolet Sonic RS - WR TV POV Test Drive
Read our thoughts on 2013 Sonic RS here:
2013 Chevrolet Sonic RS 6MT
Engine: turbocharged inline-four, 1.4
Output: 138 hp/148 lb-ft
Weight: 2811 lb
0-60 MPH: 8.1 sec (est)
Fuel Economy, City/Hwy: 29/39 mpg (est)
Base Price: $20,200
For the best video experience, we recommend wearing a good set of
headphones. The audio in this video was recorded with binaural microphones
that, when played back through headphones, give the feel of 3D sound. Trick
If you haven't already, subscribe to our channel! We post new videos like
this every week.
WINDING ROAD RACING is here, carrying the gear you need to go faster.
Chevrolet Aveo - видео-дополнение к тесту InfoCar.ua
Мы протестировали Авео в максимальной
комплектации LTZ с механикой и
единственным для Украины двигателем 1.6
литра мощностью 115 л.с. На сегодня ее цена
составляет 138330 грн. Читайте полную
версию теста на нашем сайте:
Crash test - Chevrolet Aveo
Crash test Chevrolet Aveo. EuroNCAP 2006.
Краш тест Шевроле Авео.
Crash Test 2012 - Chevrolet Sonic / Aveo (Frontal Offset) IIHS
2012 models 2012 Chevrolet Sonic: good performance in front, side,
rollover, and rear tests and standard electronic stability control
FRONTAL OFFSET TEST
OVERALL EVALUATION: Structure/safety cage Injury measures Restraints/dummy
Head/neck Chest Leg/foot, left Leg/foot, right
Important: Frontal crash test ratings can be compared only among vehicles
of similar weight.
Good Acceptable Marginal Poor
The Chevrolet Sonic was introduced in the 2012 model year as a replacement
for the Chevrolet Aveo.
Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement was well controlled. The
driver side curtain airbag deployed during the crash. After the dummy moved
forward into the frontal airbag, its head contacted the side curtain
Injury measures — Measures taken from the neck, chest, and both legs
indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this
severity. A high head acceleration occurred when the dummy's head hit the
steering wheel through the airbag, indicating that head injuries would be
Low Speed Crash Test 2010 Chevrolet Aveo
¡Mejora tu taller!
Visita la 11a Expo Reparación Automotriz 2013
WTC Cd. de México 14-15 de marzo
Pruebas de impacto no destructivas al Chevrolet Aveo 2010. Impacto trasero:
15.43 y 15.77 para el delantero. Ensayos según las normas del RCAR,
Research Council for Automobile Repair.
Toluca, México, 30/03/2010
Chevy Sonic | 2012 | Pole Crash Test | NHTSA | CrashNet1
2012/2013 Chevrolet Sonic 4 DR FWD | High Speed Camera Chevrolet Sonic 4 DR
FWD | High Speed Camera
Also known as:
Overall: 5 Stars
Frontal: 5 Stars
Side: 5 Stars
Rollover: 4 Stars
A small-sized adult female crash test dummy is placed in the
driver's seat and is secured with a seat belt. The test vehicle,
angled at 75 degrees, is then pulled sideways at 20 mph into
a 25-cm diameter pole at the driver's seating location. This
test mimics a side impact crash involving a narrow, fixed
object like a utility pole or tree.
Do you think this vehicle is safe when compared to others in the same
Do you like the test result?
MORE CRASH TESTS EVERY WEEK:
Subscribe to CrashNet1!