2012 Chevrolet Aveo CRASH TEST

The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection for the knees and femurs of both the driver and front passenger dummies and Chevrolet showed that a similar level of protection would be offered to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different seating positions. The Aveo scored maximum points in the side barrier test, all body regions being well protected. Even in the more severe pole test, the chest was adequately protected. The seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. Maximum points were scored in the dynamic tests for the protection of the 3 year infant. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded by Euro NCAP. Permanently attached labels also provide clear warnings that the passenger airbag should be disabled before a rearward facing child seat can be used in that position.

More Videos...


2012 Chevrolet Captiva CRASH TEST
Adult occupant The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs. Chevrolet showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and those sat in different positions. All body areas were well protected in the side barrier test and the car scored maximum points in this test. In the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of rib compression indiciated marginal protection of the chest area. The front seats and head restraints provided marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear end collision. Child occupant Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side barrier test, both child dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of dangerous head contacts. The passenger airbag can be disabled by means of a switch, allowing a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not clear and the system was not rewarded. Clear warnings are given of the dangers of using a rearward facing restraint in that seat without first disabling the airbag. Pedestrian The front edge of the bonnet provided uniformly poor protection to pedestrians. In most areas likely to be struck by a child's head, the bonnet provided good protection. However, predominantly poor protection was provided in those areas likely to be struck by and adult's head. Safety assist Electronic stability control is standard equipment, as is a seatbelt reminder for the driver and front passenger seats. A speed limitiation device is not available.





Car Crash & Accidents Tests - Chevrolet Nissan Mazda Fiat & More
Videos of car crash and accidents tests related to Chevrolet Volt, Mini Cooper, Fiat 500, Nissan Juke and Leaf, Mazda 5. Chevrolet Volt - 2014 TOP SAFETY PICK +, Small overlap crash test rating: ACCEPTABLE; Mini Cooper Countryman - 2014 TOP SAFETY PICK, Small overlap crash test rating: GOOD; Fiat 500L, Small overlap crash test rating: POOR; Nissan Juke, Small overlap crash test rating: POOR; Nissan Leaf, Small overlap crash test rating: MARGINAL; Mazda 5, Small overalp crash test rating: POOR; Mazda 5 - Side impact test with deformable barrier moving 31 mph, Side test rating: MARGINAL, The Mazda 5 is the only 2014 model car to earn anything less than acceptable in the side test





SMART car crash (TEST)





Chevy Sonic | 2012 | Pole Crash Test | NHTSA | CrashNet1
2012/2013 Chevrolet Sonic 4 DR FWD | High Speed Camera Chevrolet Sonic 4 DR FWD | High Speed Camera Also known as: Suzuki Swift+ Chevrolet Aveo Holden Barina NHTSA Side Overall: 5 Stars Frontal: 5 Stars Side: 5 Stars Rollover: 4 Stars A small-sized adult female crash test dummy is placed in the driver's seat and is secured with a seat belt. The test vehicle, angled at 75 degrees, is then pulled sideways at 20 mph into a 25-cm diameter pole at the driver's seating location. This test mimics a side impact crash involving a narrow, fixed object like a utility pole or tree. -- Do you think this vehicle is safe when compared to others in the same class? Do you like the test result? MORE CRASH TESTS EVERY WEEK: Subscribe to CrashNet1! http://youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=ikea55




Follow