Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

First Institute crash tests of Smart car

IIHS news release • May 14, 2008 First Institute crash tests of Smart car: diminutive two-seater earns top ratings for protecting people in front & side crashes ARLINGTON, VA — The Smart car is getting a lot of attention for its small size and style, and now it's earning impressive crash test ratings. In recent Insurance Institute for Highway Safety tests, the 2008 Smart Fortwo, the smallest car for sale in the US market, earned the top rating of good for front and side crash protection. Its seat/head restraints earned the second highest rating of acceptable for protection against whiplash in rear impacts. Full text of release at http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr051408.html


 


More Videos...


Mini and microcar bumpers
IIHS news release • June 11, 2009 Mini and microcar bumpers allow pricey damage; none of the 7 tested rates good under new system ARLINGTON, VA — Urban drivers often pick mini and microcars because they're affordable, fuel efficient, and easy to park on city streets. Fender-benders are hazards of urban driving, and just one of them can add up to thousands of dollars in repair costs because the bumpers don't adequately protect vehicles from damage. None of the bumpers on 7 mini and microcars the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety recently tested earns the top rating of good, and just 1, the Smart Fortwo, is acceptable. Five out of the 7 earn poor ratings and 1 earns a marginal. Full text of news release: http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr061109.html





Safety consequences of vehicle size and weight
IIHS news release • April 14, 2009 New crash tests demonstrate the influence of vehicle size and weight on safety in crashes; results are relevant to fuel economy policies ARLINGTON, VA — Three front-to-front crash tests, each involving a microcar or minicar into a midsize model from the same manufacturer, show how extra vehicle size and weight enhance occupant protection in collisions. These Insurance Institute for Highway Safety tests are about the physics of car crashes, which dictate that very small cars generally can't protect people in crashes as well as bigger, heavier models. Full text of release at http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr041409.html





New roof strength tests
IIHS news release • March 24, 2009 Roof strength is focus of new rating system; 4 of 12 small SUVs evaluated earn top marks ARLINGTON, VA — The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety is launching a new roof strength rating system to help consumers pick vehicles that will help protect them in rollover crashes. Twelve small SUVs are the first to be put to the test. Only 4 earn the top rating of good. The Volkswagen Tiguan has the strongest rated roof, and the Kia Sportage has the weakest among the 2008-09 models evaluated. Full text of release at http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr032409.html





2014 Volvo XC90 small overlap IIHS crash test
2014 Volvo XC90 40 mph small overlap IIHS crash test Overall evaluation: Good Full rating at http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings/vehicle/v/volvo/xc90/2014





Crash Test Lamborghini, Honda, Range Rover, Pagani Huayra #28
crash test Avto Man Subscribe to new videos http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=1AVTOman Car Crashes Compilation 2014





2013 Smart Fortwo Electric Drive | Frontal Crash Test by NHTSA | CrashNet1
Overall: 4 Stars Frontal: 4 Stars Side: 5 Stars (Side Pole: 3 Stars) Rollover: 4 Stars Risk of rollover: 15.5 % NHTSA - New Car Assessment Program (NCAP), Frontal Test: Crash test dummies representing an average-sized adult male and a small-sized adult female are placed in the driver and front passenger seats, respectively, and are secured with seat belts. Vehicles are crashed into a fixed barrier at 35 mph (56.3km/h), which is equivalent to a head-on collision between two similar vehicles each moving at 35 mph. -- Thumbs up for the crash test dummies! Do you think this vehicle is safe? Do you like the test result? More crash tests coming up every week. Favorite this video and subscribe to CrashNet1! Subscribe: http://youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=ikea55 fb: http://www.facebook.com/CrashNet1 g+: http://plus.google.com/104919524738137564116 twitter http://twitter.com/CrashNet1 On the web: http://www.CrashNet1.com





smart car crash
smart car crash safety smart car crash smart car crash statistics are smart cars safe smart car crash test rating





Smart VS. Mercedes E-Class CRASH TEST
http://www.youcar.tv





Smart Car Fortwo | 2011 | 20% Small Overlap Crash Test | NHTSA | CrashNet1
This is a new type crash test by NHTSA. 20% small overlap frontal crash test aims for vehicle safety improvements. 2011 Smart Car For Two 56mph (90 km/h) 20% Offset 7 degree angle Barrier weight: 2486 kg (5480 lbs). Moving deformable barrier impacts each vehicle at the same velocity: - Compare results across the fleet. - Procedure is more severe for smaller cars. - Potential to drive convergence of vehicle front-end stiffness. -- Thumbs up for the crash test dummies! Do you think this vehicle is safe? Do you like the test result? More crash tests coming up every week. Favorite this video and subscribe to CrashNet1! Subscribe: http://youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=ikea55 fb: http://www.facebook.com/CrashNet1 g+: http://plus.google.com/104919524738137564116 On the web: http://www.CrashNet1.com





► Smart Fortwo VS Mercedes E-Class - CRASH TEST
More Crash Test on http://www.youcarpress.com





Smart Car with Hayabusa Turbo Engine! Smart Hayabusa Donuts and Burnout, Brutal Exhaust Sound!
World's most powerful and fastest smart car doing a burnout and donuts. Smart car with hayabusa turbo engine! brutal Exhaust sound! Hayabusa Smart Car https://www.facebook.com/Hayabusaturbo





The Smart Fortwo vs the Toyota IQ
A look at the 2009 Smart ForTwo and 2012 Toyota IQ3 Blog Entry http://goo.gl/WM8P4





1971 VW Beetle vs 1972 Chevy Malibu Classic | Car-To-Car Crash Test by NHTSA | CrashNet1
Volkswagen at 35mph Chevrolet Malibu at 17mph -- Thumbs up for the crash test dummies! Do you think this vehicle is safe? Do you like the test result? More crash tests coming up every week. Favorite this video and subscribe to CrashNet1! Subscribe: http://youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=ikea55 fb: http://www.facebook.com/CrashNet1 g+: http://plus.google.com/104919524738137564116 twitter http://twitter.com/CrashNet1 On the web: http://www.CrashNet1.com





Crash Test 2008 Smart Car ForTwo (Front and Side) IIHS





Huge cost of mismatched bumpers
IIHS news release • December 2, 2010 Huge cost of mismatched bumpers: When bumpers on cars and SUVs don't line up (and many of them don't), low-speed collisions produce more damage and higher repair costs ARLINGTON, VA — Bumpers are the first line of defense against costly damage in everyday low-speed crashes. Bumpers on cars are designed to match up with each other in collisions, but a long-standing gap in federal regulations exempts SUVs from the same rules. New Insurance Institute for Highway Safety crash tests demonstrate the results: SUV bumpers that don't line up with those on cars can lead to huge repair bills in what should be minor collisions in stop-and-go traffic. Full text of release at: http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr120210.html




Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?





Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1999 Chevrolet Camaro TAFC: 5.625 @ 256.060
Jimmy Jones, Engine: TFX, Supercharger: PSI Tires: Goodyear


1968 Chevrolet Camaro rs: 6.150 @ 224.880
Shannon Jenkins, Engine: 748 Cheverolet, Tires: goodyear


1999 Chevrolet Camaro pro modified: 6.321 @ 232.780
Jordan S. Comilang, Engine: Kieth Black 527, Supercharger: Weiand 1471 Tires: Goodyear Eagles


1991 Chevrolet Camaro nitro coupe: 6.321 @ 225.670
tommy howes, Engine: blown 526, Supercharger: 1471


1996 Chevrolet Camaro : 6.440 @ 221.080
TJ Stewart,


1969 Chevrolet Camaro SS 641 Blown Pro: 6.740 @ 220.700
Nick D'Amico, Engine: 641 Blown Pro Kill, Supercharger: a bigger one Turbos: n/a


1997 Chevrolet Camaro Z28: 6.900 @ 196.000
jeff fleming, Engine: 819 CI, Supercharger: no Turbos: no


1990 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28: 6.959 @ 195.620
Marvin Blaney, Engine: Blaney's Competition,


1979 Chevrolet Camaro Z 28: 7.025 @ 210.000
Zoltan Kohari, Engine: Pat Musi Dart Big M Block, Supercharger: 14-71 Little field Tires: 34.5/17.0-16


1968 Chevrolet Camaro SS: 7.050 @ 198.000
GREG CASON, Engine: 565,


1967 Chevrolet Camaro Pro-Street: 7.470 @ 192.000
Dale L Collins Jr, Engine: 540, Turbos: 106 Precision Tires: Mickey Thompson


1968 Chevrolet Camaro RS: 7.470 @ 179.000
Ken Staib, Engine: 532 in. big block, Tires: M.T. 33 x10.5W


2002 Chevrolet Camaro bickel: 7.520 @ 175.300
Steve Tiona, Engine: 588 cid, Tires: 17x15x33


1989 Chevrolet Camaro Z28: 7.561 @ 189.000
Steve Toppe, Engine: 615, Tires: 33.5x17


1967 Chevrolet Camaro ss632: 7.860 @ 165.800
Thomas Coffman, Engine: 632, Supercharger: none Turbos: none Tires: 33x17x15 goodyear


1992 Chevrolet Camaro : 7.936 @ 172.210
Todd, Engine: 548 BBC,


1978 Chevrolet Camaro Z28: 7.970 @ 176.000
Aldo Aka Junior, Engine: 572ci, Tires: Goodyear


1990 Chevrolet Camaro : 8.220 @ 165.000
JCE, Engine: 468 small block chevy, Tires: 10.5 W


1978 Chevrolet Camaro z-28: 8.280 @ 160.000
john begglry, Engine: 565, Tires: goodyear


1987 Chevrolet Camaro : 8.300 @ 165.000
Jamie Oxendine, Engine: 540cu chevy, Supercharger: none Turbos: none Tires: 33.5/15/15


 


©2014 DragTimes - Disclaimer