Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

First Institute crash tests of Smart car

IIHS news release • May 14, 2008 First Institute crash tests of Smart car: diminutive two-seater earns top ratings for protecting people in front & side crashes ARLINGTON, VA — The Smart car is getting a lot of attention for its small size and style, and now it's earning impressive crash test ratings. In recent Insurance Institute for Highway Safety tests, the 2008 Smart Fortwo, the smallest car for sale in the US market, earned the top rating of good for front and side crash protection. Its seat/head restraints earned the second highest rating of acceptable for protection against whiplash in rear impacts. Full text of release at http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr051408.html


 


More Videos...


Mini and microcar bumpers
IIHS news release • June 11, 2009 Mini and microcar bumpers allow pricey damage; none of the 7 tested rates good under new system ARLINGTON, VA — Urban drivers often pick mini and microcars because they're affordable, fuel efficient, and easy to park on city streets. Fender-benders are hazards of urban driving, and just one of them can add up to thousands of dollars in repair costs because the bumpers don't adequately protect vehicles from damage. None of the bumpers on 7 mini and microcars the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety recently tested earns the top rating of good, and just 1, the Smart Fortwo, is acceptable. Five out of the 7 earn poor ratings and 1 earns a marginal. Full text of news release: http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr061109.html





Safety consequences of vehicle size and weight
IIHS news release • April 14, 2009 New crash tests demonstrate the influence of vehicle size and weight on safety in crashes; results are relevant to fuel economy policies ARLINGTON, VA — Three front-to-front crash tests, each involving a microcar or minicar into a midsize model from the same manufacturer, show how extra vehicle size and weight enhance occupant protection in collisions. These Insurance Institute for Highway Safety tests are about the physics of car crashes, which dictate that very small cars generally can't protect people in crashes as well as bigger, heavier models. Full text of release at http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr041409.html





Low-speed vehicle crash tests
IIHS news release • May 20, 2010 ARLINGTON, VA - Low-speed vehicles and minitrucks shouldn't share busy public roads with regular traffic More states are allowing a relatively new breed of vehicle on public roads, but crash tests by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety show why the mix of low-speed vehicles (LSVs) or minitrucks and regular traffic is a deadly combination. LSVs are designed for tooling around residential neighborhoods, and minitrucks are for hauling cargo off-road. While these vehicles have a lot of appeal as a way to reduce emissions and cut fuel use, they don't have to meet the basic safety standards that cars and pickups do, and they aren't designed to protect their occupants in crashes. Full text of release at http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr052010.html





Huge cost of mismatched bumpers
IIHS news release • December 2, 2010 Huge cost of mismatched bumpers: When bumpers on cars and SUVs don't line up (and many of them don't), low-speed collisions produce more damage and higher repair costs ARLINGTON, VA — Bumpers are the first line of defense against costly damage in everyday low-speed crashes. Bumpers on cars are designed to match up with each other in collisions, but a long-standing gap in federal regulations exempts SUVs from the same rules. New Insurance Institute for Highway Safety crash tests demonstrate the results: SUV bumpers that don't line up with those on cars can lead to huge repair bills in what should be minor collisions in stop-and-go traffic. Full text of release at: http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr120210.html





Crash Test Lamborghini, Honda, Range Rover, Pagani Huayra #28
crash test Avto Man Subscribe to new videos http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=1AVTOman Car Crashes Compilation 2014





2013 Smart Fortwo Electric Drive | Frontal Crash Test by NHTSA | CrashNet1
Overall: 4 Stars Frontal: 4 Stars Side: 5 Stars (Side Pole: 3 Stars) Rollover: 4 Stars Risk of rollover: 15.5 % NHTSA - New Car Assessment Program (NCAP), Frontal Test: Crash test dummies representing an average-sized adult male and a small-sized adult female are placed in the driver and front passenger seats, respectively, and are secured with seat belts. Vehicles are crashed into a fixed barrier at 35 mph (56.3km/h), which is equivalent to a head-on collision between two similar vehicles each moving at 35 mph. -- Thumbs up for the crash test dummies! Do you think this vehicle is safe? Do you like the test result? More crash tests coming up every week. Favorite this video and subscribe to CrashNet1! Subscribe: http://youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=ikea55 fb: http://www.facebook.com/CrashNet1 g+: http://plus.google.com/104919524738137564116 twitter http://twitter.com/CrashNet1 On the web: http://www.CrashNet1.com





Smart VS. Mercedes E-Class CRASH TEST
http://www.youcar.tv





SMART car crash (TEST)





Smart fortwo production, Hambach 2014
Footage of the Smart fortwo being produced at the company's Hambach plant. Shot in 2014.





New roof strength tests
IIHS news release • March 24, 2009 Roof strength is focus of new rating system; 4 of 12 small SUVs evaluated earn top marks ARLINGTON, VA — The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety is launching a new roof strength rating system to help consumers pick vehicles that will help protect them in rollover crashes. Twelve small SUVs are the first to be put to the test. Only 4 earn the top rating of good. The Volkswagen Tiguan has the strongest rated roof, and the Kia Sportage has the weakest among the 2008-09 models evaluated. Full text of release at http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr032409.html





TOP 10 WORST CRASH TESTS
Thanks For Watching! Make Sure You Leave A Like! And Make Sure You Subscribe To Me And Others! Twitter: https://twitter.com/rp01ful https://twitter.com/RP01fulYoutube RP01ful : http://www.youtube.com/user/RP01ful Mr Geoclay : http://www.youtube.com/user/MrGeoclay Hi!, It's Regan : http://www.youtube.com/channel/UClVzxtLAINUdDv-JIP7XB0A exL Aquas : http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbo0RvMR7MAfo4KOHlNDlyg Theawsomegamer: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZ-pj2aAST-0FMr96hsyrxg Make Sure You Like My friends Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/snapsaplenty





The Smart Fortwo vs the Toyota IQ
A look at the 2009 Smart ForTwo and 2012 Toyota IQ3 Blog Entry http://goo.gl/WM8P4





2012 KIA Picanto, Smart ForTwo, & Renault Twingo ADAC Incompatibility Testing
Three new tests performed on three new compacts. A 50% offset where both the sled and vehicle are moving at 50 Km/h. Smart ForTwo: Best Performer. Minor head injuries, severe foot and thigh injuries, and moderate tibia injuries are possible for the driver. Moderate chest and thigh injuries and minor tibia injuries are possible for the Passenger. KIA Picanto: 2nd place Performance. Severe chest, thigh, and foot injuries, and moderate foot injuries are possible. Minor tibia injuries are possible for the Passenger. Renault Twingo: Worst performer. Severe chest, thigh, tibia, and foot injuries are possible for the driver. Minor chest, thigh, and tibia injuries are possible for the passenger.





smart car crash. with 70 miles against a concrete wall
smart ,smart commercial, smart car, smart fortwo, MCC smart, open your mind, kaputt, unfall, crash, destroyed, safety,70 miles an hour agains a concrete wall, what will happen,





Car to Car CRASH TEST
http://www.youcar.tv





Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?




Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1965 Chevrolet CK1500 Truck : 9.390 @ 139.000
Mr Hipp, Engine: 451ci Chev, Tires: 13x31 Stones


1988 Ford Festiva L: 9.970 @ 145.200
Steve, Engine: 1.6l Mazda Turbo, Turbos: Garrett GT28RS Tires: Hoosiers


1988 Ford Festiva BS: 9.970 @ 145.200
Steve Poindexter,


1965 Chevrolet CK1500 Truck : 10.090 @ 129.478
MrHipp, Engine: sml blk Chevy, Tires: 13x31 Stones


1991 Ford Festiva : 10.100 @ 136.000
dannon s., Engine: 1.6t from mazda 323gtx, Turbos: fmax turbo systems Tires: drag radials


1986 Chevrolet CK1500 Truck : 10.319 @ 132.300
David Clark, Engine: small chevy,


1989 Chevrolet CK1500 Truck : 10.320 @ 132.000
Jared Bellflower, Engine: 496, Tires: Hoosier Quik Time Pro


1984 Chevrolet CK1500 Truck short bed step side: 11.090 @ 118.000
David Baker, Engine: Buick 455, Supercharger: no Turbos: no Tires: MT drag


2004 Chevrolet CK1500 Truck Silverado SS: 11.190 @ 121.800
chase g, Engine: 370 ( 6.0 forged everything), Supercharger: Vortech t trim Tires: toyo 305/40/22 street/ mt et street 305/45/18 trac


2003 Chevrolet CK1500 Truck : 11.240 @ 121.630
Efren 6.0, Engine: Lq9 6.0, Tires: Hoosier slicks 28:10:16


1989 Chevrolet CK1500 Truck Silverado Sportside: 11.823 @ 114.410
Charlie Grech, Engine: 350 Bored .030 Over, Supercharger: No Turbos: No Tires: M/T Slicks 28x15x10.5


1995 Chevrolet CK1500 Truck C1500 2WD Manual: 12.072 @ 112.903
Jonathan, Engine: 355 SBC (.030 over), Supercharger: not yet anyways...lol Turbos: nope Tires: BFG Radials


1993 Chevrolet CK1500 Truck : 12.200 @ 109.000
frank maldanado, Engine: 383,


1991 Chevrolet CK1500 Truck : 12.228 @ 111.940
Eric, Engine: 355,


1982 Chevrolet CK1500 Truck : 12.250 @ 105.690
brad waldrop, Engine: chevy 355, Tires: 28.0 / 10.5


2005 Chevrolet CK1500 Truck SS Reg Cab: 12.400 @ 112.000
snapper, Engine: 4.8 Vortec, Tires: m/t street sliks


1991 Chevrolet CK1500 Truck SS454: 12.430 @ 107.810
henry cooper, Engine: 454, Tires: 28


2001 Chevrolet CK1500 Truck LS, Daily Driver: 12.680 @ 109.620
DAllAS, Engine: 6.2L (378ci), Supercharger: N/A Turbos: N/A Tires: Goodyear Eagle 285/50R20


1988 Ford Festiva L: 12.768 @ 108.470
Ulises, Engine: B6T, Turbos: VJ14 Tires: 20'' m/t slick


1983 Chevrolet CK1500 Truck Silverado 4x4: 12.800 @ 112.567
me, Engine: 388 stroker small block, Supercharger: no Turbos: no Tires: BFG Mud Terrain 33x12.5


 


©2014 DragTimes - Disclaimer - Contact Us