Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

Mahindra XUV 500 vs. Toyota Fortuner Video Comparison by CarToq.com

Given that the Mahindra XUV500 offers a lot more than the Toyota Fortuner in terms of features -- that too, at a significantly reduced price -- there's simply no argument that the XUV is better value for money. But in terms of build quality and long-term reliability, you can't go wrong with a Fortuner. For more, visit http://www.CarToq.com


 


More Videos...


Mahindra XUV 500 W8 Video Review and Road Test by CarToq.com
The Mahindra XUV500 is a great feature-laden cross-over that's absolute value for money. It has good on-road manners, drives well, and is quite comfortable for everyday city use as well as long, cross-country road trips. For more, visit http://www.CarToq.com





Mahindra XUV500 vs Renault Duster: Video Comparison by CarToq.com
If you are looking for a full fledged SUV with a good set of features on offer and can spare the money, then the Mahindra XUV500 is the vehicle for you. However, if you want a compact vehicle the Renault Duster is better suited as an urban SUV, and a good alternative to a sedan. For more, visit http://www.CarToq.com





Tata Aria Pleasure vs Mahindra XUV500 W8 - Comparison Video by CarToq.com
If you are looking for a crossover with seven seats and want the most bang for your buck, the Mahindra XUV500 delivers on all counts. But if space is a priority, the Tata Aria has an edge. Our pick, would be the XUV. For more, visit http://www.CarToq.com





Toyota Fortuner off-roading video review, CarToq.com road test of 2012 Toyota Fortuner SUV India
This video review of the Toyota Fortuner is brought to you by http://www.CarToq.com Visit us for the latest news, videos, and to ask questions to the CarToq community of car owners and experts. The new Toyota Fortuner is in most ways better than the 2011 variant in all aspects but one - the design from the front. It is a little too tame, we feel. Keep that aside, and the Fortuner 4x4 for 2012 is clearly a more sophisticated, cooler car in almost all respects. here we take the new Toyota Fortuner over some really rough terrain testing out its off road capabilities. we also drive it on tarmac - of course! - to see if it is suitable for those who go off road very rarely. http://www.CarToq.com





Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?




Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1972 Ford Pinto : 9.630 @ 137.890
Jeff Wilson, Engine: Ford 472, Supercharger: no Turbos: no Tires: Good Year Eagles


1977 Ford Pinto : 10.312 @ 136.230
J.D. CRANKS (' EM UP!), Engine: 2976CC 2.3L FORD 4 CYL., Supercharger: NONE BUT THIS SEEMS COOL Turbos: NONE BUT THINKING ABOUT IT Tires: 15X14X32 GOODYEARS


1972 Ford Pinto : 10.884 @ 120.640
Chris Russell, Engine: 331 Stroker, Tires: Hoosers 33/15


1971 Ford Pinto sand bagger: 10.990 @ 103.200
David McLellan, Engine: 460 Ford, 0 0 Tires: 14x32


1971 Ford Pinto : 12.244 @ 108.610
Jeff Wilson, Engine: 306, Tires: 28 / 10.5 / 15 ET Drags


1978 Ford Pinto Electric: 12.470 @ 104.470
Mike Willmon/Hank Buettner, Engine: Two 9 inch electric motors, Supercharger: none Turbos: nope Tires: Hoosier 275/60R15 Drag Radials


2005 Saab 9-2x : 13.253 @ 102.520
TheChurt, Engine: 2.0, Turbos: FP 16G Tires: Sumoto


2011 Hyundai Equus : 14.510 @ 99.050
NA, Engine: V8: 385 HP,


2005 Saab 9-2x Aero: 14.710 @ 92.010
CD,


2005 Saab 9-2x Aero: 14.800 @ 92.000
Brian,


2005 Saab 9-2x Aero: 14.904 @ 92.610
Matt,


1978 Ford Pinto pony: 16.591 @ 83.940
chris bryce, Engine: 2.3L 4 cyl, Supercharger: none Turbos: none Tires: bfgoodrich


 


©2015 DragTimes - Disclaimer - Contact Us