Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

Top-Heavy (Crash Test Rollovers Compilation)

I made this for MfalmeVTold since he requested it. This video features the following vehicles: 2009 Honda Stepwgn 2010 Ford Ranger 2009 Daihatsu Mira 2003 Chevrolet Blazer 2010 Daihatsu Tanto 2006 Dodge Dakota Crew Cab 2011 Daihatsu Move 2011 Nissan Rogue 2011 Nissan Serena 2011 Nissan Elgrand 1999 Isuzu Rodeo 2009 Toyota Prado 2008 Nissan Rogue


 


More Videos...


TOP 10 WORST CRASH TESTS
Thanks For Watching! Make Sure You Leave A Like! And Make Sure You Subscribe To Me And Others! Twitter: https://twitter.com/rp01ful https://twitter.com/RP01fulYoutube RP01ful : http://www.youtube.com/user/RP01ful Mr Geoclay : http://www.youtube.com/user/MrGeoclay Hi!, It's Regan : http://www.youtube.com/channel/UClVzxtLAINUdDv-JIP7XB0A exL Aquas : http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbo0RvMR7MAfo4KOHlNDlyg Theawsomegamer: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZ-pj2aAST-0FMr96hsyrxg Make Sure You Like My friends Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/snapsaplenty





2009 Chevy Malibu vs 1959 Bel Air Crash Test
This crash test between a modern sedan and the classic 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air shows just how far passenger protection has come in the last fifty years. The Institute for Highway Safety staged the test to commemorate its 50th anniversary. Find more crash tests on our web site: http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/video-hub/cars/iihs-crash-tests/67619540 5001/?EXTKEY=I93YT01&CMP=OTC-YUTBE





Mini and microcar bumpers
IIHS news release • June 11, 2009 Mini and microcar bumpers allow pricey damage; none of the 7 tested rates good under new system ARLINGTON, VA — Urban drivers often pick mini and microcars because they're affordable, fuel efficient, and easy to park on city streets. Fender-benders are hazards of urban driving, and just one of them can add up to thousands of dollars in repair costs because the bumpers don't adequately protect vehicles from damage. None of the bumpers on 7 mini and microcars the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety recently tested earns the top rating of good, and just 1, the Smart Fortwo, is acceptable. Five out of the 7 earn poor ratings and 1 earns a marginal. Full text of news release: http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr061109.html





Roll over crash - No seat belt
Driver falls asleep, car rolls over. Driver doesn't have a seat belt on.





Chevrolet Tahoe | 2013 | Frontal Crash Test | NHTSA High Speed Camera | CrashNet1
Thumbs up for the crash dummies! Do you think this vehicle is safe when compared to others in the same class? Please comment. Crash test dummies representing an average-sized adult male and a small-sized adult female are placed in the driver and front passenger seats, respectively, and are secured with seat belts. Vehicles are crashed into a fixed barrier at 35 mph (56.3km/h), which is equivalent to a head-on collision between two similar vehicles each moving at 35 mph. Chevy Tahoe LS 4WD 2011 Chevy Tahoe LS 4WD 2012 Chevy Tahoe LS 4WD 2013 Vehicle Test Weight: 5678 lbs. Overall: 4 Stars Frontal: 5 Stars Side: 5 Stars Rollover: 3 Stars -- Thumbs up for the crash test dummies! Do you think this vehicle is safe? Do you like the test result? More crash tests coming up every week. Favorite this video and subscribe to CrashNet1! Subscribe: http://youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=ikea55 fb: http://www.facebook.com/CrashNet1 g+: http://plus.google.com/104919524738137564116 On the web: http://www.CrashNet1.com





Low-speed vehicle crash tests
IIHS news release • May 20, 2010 ARLINGTON, VA - Low-speed vehicles and minitrucks shouldn't share busy public roads with regular traffic More states are allowing a relatively new breed of vehicle on public roads, but crash tests by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety show why the mix of low-speed vehicles (LSVs) or minitrucks and regular traffic is a deadly combination. LSVs are designed for tooling around residential neighborhoods, and minitrucks are for hauling cargo off-road. While these vehicles have a lot of appeal as a way to reduce emissions and cut fuel use, they don't have to meet the basic safety standards that cars and pickups do, and they aren't designed to protect their occupants in crashes. Full text of release at http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr052010.html





1992 S-10 Rollover Test 1
This is an old 92 S-10 that i sold to a neighbor of mine. he worked for a Crash Test company and this is them rolling my truck!! Found it on my old harddrive and thought i'd put it up here! Enjoy.





ADAC - Small convertibles in the rollover test
Somersault in the ADAC crash test center: convertibles fly with just under 50 kilometers per hour through the air and land upside down. The unfortunate result: Citroën C3 Pluriel, Mini Cooper and Peugeot 207 reveal - as well as in 2003 tested models of the middle class by Mazda, Opel and VW - a significant improvement. Convertibles are in fashion: They look chic and bring to motorists the Closer to Nature. But the missing roof earned him not only light and air, but in very rare case of a rollover also unpleasantly close contact with the earth. Reinforced windscreen frame and roll bar to prevent the worst. To check whether the rollover protection for the passengers really works, the ADAC crash test engineers have dropped three small current convertibles on the head. For the rollover we chose especially popular models: the extravagant Citroen C3 Pluriel, the trendy Mini Cooper and the neat little Peugeot 207 CC. The rollover protection systems of this four-seat open-air versions are designed differently. While Citroën only on the stability of the windshield frame (A-pillar) is that BMW engineers have her convertible standard added two fixed rollover bars and even two Peugeot automatically EXTENDING high guard. The rollover test, the ADAC engineers revealed again defects in occupant protection: the front occupants of convertibles are poorly protected when the A-pillars do not have the stability offered. Thus, the Citroën, are exposed in both the front and rear passengers a very high risk of injury, only get the ADAC "poor". The Mini conceded despite a stable windshield frame for the first row of seats, the ADAC-grade "fair" and a backbencher for "satisfactory". Of the very high outgoing automatic Überrollbügen the Peugeot benefited particularly the second row, which with the ADAC score pays "good", however, because it is the deformation joyful "A-pillar" for front only the predicate "sufficient". More safety in the convertible is not magic, however: In addition to the essential stability of the windscreen frame and a sufficiently high rear roll bar are seat belts with height adjustment and belt tensioner triggering rollover protection as a fundamental essential. To avoid arcing should be fitted every convertible also with the electronic stability control. Here the vehicle manufacturers are required. Individual result: Peugeot 207 CC: The fresh sequel to the popular best-selling 206 CC has been just over a year on the road. For occupant protection Peugeot automatically offers high EXTENDING roll bar, which benefit especially the backbenchers. In return, earned the Frenchman open the ADAC as "good", although the rear protection for taller people (from 1.75 meters) is still in need of improvement. Less sure of the seats in the front row because of the windshield frame (A-pillar) with about 11 centimeters most deformed compared to test competitors. Despite the rear roll bar so the front survival space is drastically reduced, so here is the occupant protection only with the ADAC grade of "satisfactory". In addition to all passengers is the lack of seat belt height adjustment unfavorable and only the ignition pretensioners for the dangerous sliding out counter of the straps. Individual result: Mini Cooper Convertible: The trendy classic rolls past seven years almost unchanged from the southern English band. The rollover protection is solid: A stable framework in conjunction with rear wheel, rigid roll bar offers the largest remaining survival space of all test subjects. Unfortunately, this success is created by unfavorable belts naught: In our test, the passenger slid sharply with the upper body from the belt and hit very hard on the road. This dangerous effect could be effectively reduced by a seat belt height adjustment and a belt tensioner. Even the rear passengers are only befriedend protected because the test was a brief head contact. The roll bars are also sized for riders from 1.75 meters too short. Individual result: Citroen C3 Pluriel: With an extravagant design and a clever roof mechanism allows the French car especially the hearts of fresh air loving women since mid-2003 beat. Less trouble the Citroën designers have invested in the occupant protection: An adequate rollover protection is absent when the Pluriel goes with recessed roof rails over the country. This means that the front and rear passengers exposed to a very high risk of injury for the passengers can be total only rated "poor". To be in the Citroen nevertheless better protected in the event of a rare rollover, you should not do without the detachable roof bars. Source and more info here: http://www.adac.de/infotestrat/tests/crash-test/cabrio_rollover/default.asp x?ComponentId=25850&SourcePageId=31799





Small pickup rollover protection
IIHS news release • February 4, 2010 First time Institute ratings small pickups for rollover protection; only one model rates good in test that assures strength of roof ARLINGTON, VA — The Nissan Frontier has the strongest roof and the Chevrolet Colorado the weakest among 5 small pickup trucks, all 2010 models, that recently were tested for rollover protection by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. The Frontier, also sold as the Suzuki Equator, is the only pickup in the group to earn the highest rating of good. The Ford Ranger is rated acceptable while the Dodge Dakota, Toyota Tacoma, and Colorado (also sold as the GMC Canyon) earn the second lowest rating of marginal. Full text of release at http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr020410.html





► 2009 BMW X6 - CRASH TEST
► http://www.facebook.com/youcarpress





2007 Ford Expedition | Dynamic Rollover Test by NHTSA | CrashNet1
This dynamic rollover crash test was conducted to investigate the dynamics of belted occupants during rollover crashes. This test was conducted with a modified 2007 Ford Expedition on the FMVSS 208 rollover cart moving at 48.1 km/h (29.9 mph), releasing the vehicle with its roll axis perpendicular to the direction of rollover cart motion, and first contacting the passenger's side. The vehicle was modified by replacing the rear seat with a modified front seat to simulate similar characteristics in both seating positions. The center console was also removed. The air bags were disabled for this test condition. The OEM belts and buckles were replaced in all positions. The driver and left rear seats were replaced with a seat with integrated 3-Point belts without pretensioners. The right front position was equipped with a motorized retractor and a pretension buckle system1. The pretensioner was fired manually at 300ms into the event and the motorized retractor was manually activated prior to launch. -- Thumbs up for the crash test dummies! Do you think this vehicle is safe? Do you like the test result? Favorite this video and subscribe to CrashNet1! More crash tests coming up every week. Subscribe: http://youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=ikea55 fb: http://www.facebook.com/CrashNet1 g+: http://plus.google.com/104919524738137564116 twitter http://twitter.com/CrashNet1 On the web: http://www.CrashNet1.com





Toyota Landcruiser Prado 4WD Test Drive
Toyota introduced its new Prado Landcruiser mid-size 4WD as a "best of both worlds" solution for both the highway and the rough stuff. Gizmag had a chance to test the vehicle on all types of terrain - including, open roads, tight forest trails and a formidable purpose built 4x4 track - and it didn't fail to impress. Full story and image gallery at http://www.gizmag.com/prado-test-drive/13534/





супертест Toyota Landcruiser prado 150
супертест Toyota Landcruiser prado 150





2014 Volvo XC90 small overlap IIHS crash test
2014 Volvo XC90 40 mph small overlap IIHS crash test Overall evaluation: Good Full rating at http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings/vehicle/v/volvo/xc90/2014





BMW Safety - Rollover Facility Crash Tests
BMW performs rollover safety crash tests on their BMWs. This is above and beyond any requirements by the United States National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, but is part of BMWs drive to keep their customers as safe as possible.




Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?





Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1995 Chevrolet Lumina : 7.710 @ 186.300
Sam Parker, Engine: 565 Cubic Inches,


1999 Panoz AIV Roadster : 12.100 @ 110.000
Clements,


1992 Chevrolet Lumina Z34: 12.720 @ 113.200
Eric Holland, Engine: 3.4L DOHC 207cu., Supercharger: Eaton Tires: 265/40R18


1991 Chevrolet Lumina : 12.747 @ 108.250
Tom Wright, Engine: 3800 Series II Supercharged, Supercharger: Eaton M90 Tires: Mohawk Predator HRS


1998 Chevrolet Lumina LTZ Supercharger: 13.033 @ 104.400
Shawn Bucklad, Engine: L67, Supercharger: M90 Tires: MT Sportsman Pro


2004 BMW 745Li : 14.500 @ 98.600
NA, Engine: 4.4 Liter V-8,


2004 Infiniti QX56 : 15.210 @ 88.510
NA,


1994 Chevrolet Lumina Z34: 15.580 @ 89.250
David Rickey, Engine: 3.4L V6,


2005 Infiniti QX56 : 15.700 @ 88.000
NA,


1991 Chevrolet Lumina z34: 15.790 @ 90.108
Francis Guillemette, Engine: 3.4 twin dual cam v6 24 valves, Tires: 225/60/16


1998 Chevrolet Lumina LS: 16.021 @ 79.000
Lee Roy Goolsby III, Engine: 3.1 liter SFI,


1999 Chevrolet Lumina ls: 16.760 @ 81.500
adam rich, Engine: 3.1L, Tires: 225/60 goodyears


1999 Chevrolet Lumina Standard: 17.010 @ 80.680
Mark, Engine: 3.1 Liter DOHC,


1994 Chevrolet Lumina Euro: 18.100 @ 81.500
Pat G, Engine: stock 3.1 mpfi, Tires: 215/60/16 eagle GA


 


©2014 DragTimes - Disclaimer