Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

Top-Heavy (Crash Test Rollovers Compilation)

I made this for MfalmeVTold since he requested it. This video features the following vehicles: 2009 Honda Stepwgn 2010 Ford Ranger 2009 Daihatsu Mira 2003 Chevrolet Blazer 2010 Daihatsu Tanto 2006 Dodge Dakota Crew Cab 2011 Daihatsu Move 2011 Nissan Rogue 2011 Nissan Serena 2011 Nissan Elgrand 1999 Isuzu Rodeo 2009 Toyota Prado 2008 Nissan Rogue


 


More Videos...


1992 S-10 Rollover Test 1
This is an old 92 S-10 that i sold to a neighbor of mine. he worked for a Crash Test company and this is them rolling my truck!! Found it on my old harddrive and thought i'd put it up here! Enjoy.





JEEP ROLLOVER Compilation 2014
Like/Share/Subscribe I do not own any of these videos and respect everybody in them. Check out the Original owners Channels





SUV Rollovers - The Hidden Secrets of the SUV Safety Documentary
I do not own the content or copyright of this video. Rollover - The Hidden History of the SUV' is a US documentary from 2002. This documentary explores the history and development of the SUV / 4x4 and the growing number of rollover fatalities that seemed to increase at the same time as the SUV rose in popularity.





TOP 10 WORST CRASH TESTS
Thanks For Watching! Make Sure You Leave A Like! And Make Sure You Subscribe To Me And Others! Twitter: https://twitter.com/rp01ful https://twitter.com/RP01fulYoutube RP01ful : http://www.youtube.com/user/RP01ful Mr Geoclay : http://www.youtube.com/user/MrGeoclay Hi!, It's Regan : http://www.youtube.com/channel/UClVzxtLAINUdDv-JIP7XB0A exL Aquas : http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbo0RvMR7MAfo4KOHlNDlyg Theawsomegamer: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZ-pj2aAST-0FMr96hsyrxg Make Sure You Like My friends Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/snapsaplenty





157. Worst Crash Test Ratings of all Time Compilation 7
Rover 100/Metro/114/114i/111i/115 D/R6, Austin Metro, Kia Sephia/Mentor/Shuma/Spectra, Ford Sierra/Scorpio/P100, Merkur XR4Ti, Ford Courier/Everest/Ranger, Mazda Bravo/Fighter/Proceed/B2500/UN, Ford Ranger J97M/Everest, Mazda BT 50, Hyundai Sonata/EF/Sonica, Kia Optima/Magentis, Audi A4/B8/Typ 8K, Toyota Camry XV50, Daihatsu Altis, Kia Soul/Track'ster/TrackSter/Track'ter/TrackTer, Mazda CX 9, Ford Edge, Honda Pilot/MR V, Honda Fit/Jazz, Chevy/Chevrolet/Holden Cruze, Daewoo Lacetti Premiere, Lexus IS XE20/IS 250/IS 350/IS 220d/IS F, Lexus ES/XV40/ES 240/ES 350/GSV40/ES 300h, Hyundai Accent/RB/Fluidic Verna/Solaris/Grand Avega/Verna/i25, Dodge Attitude, Toyota RAV4/XA40, Hyundai Tucson/ix35, Buick Encore, Opel/Vaux/Vauxhall Mokka, Toyota Prius c/Aqua, Toyota Corolla/E160/Axio/Fielder, Mitsu/Mitsubishi Mirage/Space Star/Attrage





Low-speed vehicle crash tests
IIHS news release • May 20, 2010 ARLINGTON, VA - Low-speed vehicles and minitrucks shouldn't share busy public roads with regular traffic More states are allowing a relatively new breed of vehicle on public roads, but crash tests by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety show why the mix of low-speed vehicles (LSVs) or minitrucks and regular traffic is a deadly combination. LSVs are designed for tooling around residential neighborhoods, and minitrucks are for hauling cargo off-road. While these vehicles have a lot of appeal as a way to reduce emissions and cut fuel use, they don't have to meet the basic safety standards that cars and pickups do, and they aren't designed to protect their occupants in crashes. Full text of release at http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr052010.html





New Crash Test Mercedes E-Class Convertible 2010
New Crash Test Mercedes E-Class Convertible 2010





2009 Chevy Malibu vs 1959 Bel Air Crash Test
This crash test between a modern sedan and the classic 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air shows just how far passenger protection has come in the last fifty years. The Institute for Highway Safety staged the test to commemorate its 50th anniversary. Find more crash tests on our web site: http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/video-hub/cars/iihs-crash-tests/67619540 5001/?EXTKEY=I93YT01&CMP=OTC-YUTBE





Mini and microcar bumpers
IIHS news release • June 11, 2009 Mini and microcar bumpers allow pricey damage; none of the 7 tested rates good under new system ARLINGTON, VA — Urban drivers often pick mini and microcars because they're affordable, fuel efficient, and easy to park on city streets. Fender-benders are hazards of urban driving, and just one of them can add up to thousands of dollars in repair costs because the bumpers don't adequately protect vehicles from damage. None of the bumpers on 7 mini and microcars the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety recently tested earns the top rating of good, and just 1, the Smart Fortwo, is acceptable. Five out of the 7 earn poor ratings and 1 earns a marginal. Full text of news release: http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr061109.html





Mercedes C-Class VS Chevrolet Malibu - CRASH TEST





Chevy Tahoe (2007) - JRS Test
Here is a Jordan Rollover System (JRS) test on a 2007 Chevy Tahoe to measure the roof strength. This Video Contains both roll 1 and roll 2 of the same vehicle to simulate the actual event of a rollover (rollover accidents usually involve more than one roll). As you will see the A and B pillar both undergo significant roof crush.





Jeep Grand Cherokee moose test -- the full story
All performed moose tests with Jeep Grand Cherokee. All failed. The full story and figures at: http://www.teknikensvarld.se/jeepmoosetest-part4/





Huge cost of mismatched bumpers
IIHS news release • December 2, 2010 Huge cost of mismatched bumpers: When bumpers on cars and SUVs don't line up (and many of them don't), low-speed collisions produce more damage and higher repair costs ARLINGTON, VA — Bumpers are the first line of defense against costly damage in everyday low-speed crashes. Bumpers on cars are designed to match up with each other in collisions, but a long-standing gap in federal regulations exempts SUVs from the same rules. New Insurance Institute for Highway Safety crash tests demonstrate the results: SUV bumpers that don't line up with those on cars can lead to huge repair bills in what should be minor collisions in stop-and-go traffic. Full text of release at: http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr120210.html





Crash Test a 200km/h
Focus jogado contra um bloco de concreto a 200km/h. Matéria completa no primeiro episódio da vigésima temporada do Fifth Gear.





ADAC - Small convertibles in the rollover test
Somersault in the ADAC crash test center: convertibles fly with just under 50 kilometers per hour through the air and land upside down. The unfortunate result: Citroën C3 Pluriel, Mini Cooper and Peugeot 207 reveal - as well as in 2003 tested models of the middle class by Mazda, Opel and VW - a significant improvement. Convertibles are in fashion: They look chic and bring to motorists the Closer to Nature. But the missing roof earned him not only light and air, but in very rare case of a rollover also unpleasantly close contact with the earth. Reinforced windscreen frame and roll bar to prevent the worst. To check whether the rollover protection for the passengers really works, the ADAC crash test engineers have dropped three small current convertibles on the head. For the rollover we chose especially popular models: the extravagant Citroen C3 Pluriel, the trendy Mini Cooper and the neat little Peugeot 207 CC. The rollover protection systems of this four-seat open-air versions are designed differently. While Citroën only on the stability of the windshield frame (A-pillar) is that BMW engineers have her convertible standard added two fixed rollover bars and even two Peugeot automatically EXTENDING high guard. The rollover test, the ADAC engineers revealed again defects in occupant protection: the front occupants of convertibles are poorly protected when the A-pillars do not have the stability offered. Thus, the Citroën, are exposed in both the front and rear passengers a very high risk of injury, only get the ADAC "poor". The Mini conceded despite a stable windshield frame for the first row of seats, the ADAC-grade "fair" and a backbencher for "satisfactory". Of the very high outgoing automatic Überrollbügen the Peugeot benefited particularly the second row, which with the ADAC score pays "good", however, because it is the deformation joyful "A-pillar" for front only the predicate "sufficient". More safety in the convertible is not magic, however: In addition to the essential stability of the windscreen frame and a sufficiently high rear roll bar are seat belts with height adjustment and belt tensioner triggering rollover protection as a fundamental essential. To avoid arcing should be fitted every convertible also with the electronic stability control. Here the vehicle manufacturers are required. Individual result: Peugeot 207 CC: The fresh sequel to the popular best-selling 206 CC has been just over a year on the road. For occupant protection Peugeot automatically offers high EXTENDING roll bar, which benefit especially the backbenchers. In return, earned the Frenchman open the ADAC as "good", although the rear protection for taller people (from 1.75 meters) is still in need of improvement. Less sure of the seats in the front row because of the windshield frame (A-pillar) with about 11 centimeters most deformed compared to test competitors. Despite the rear roll bar so the front survival space is drastically reduced, so here is the occupant protection only with the ADAC grade of "satisfactory". In addition to all passengers is the lack of seat belt height adjustment unfavorable and only the ignition pretensioners for the dangerous sliding out counter of the straps. Individual result: Mini Cooper Convertible: The trendy classic rolls past seven years almost unchanged from the southern English band. The rollover protection is solid: A stable framework in conjunction with rear wheel, rigid roll bar offers the largest remaining survival space of all test subjects. Unfortunately, this success is created by unfavorable belts naught: In our test, the passenger slid sharply with the upper body from the belt and hit very hard on the road. This dangerous effect could be effectively reduced by a seat belt height adjustment and a belt tensioner. Even the rear passengers are only befriedend protected because the test was a brief head contact. The roll bars are also sized for riders from 1.75 meters too short. Individual result: Citroen C3 Pluriel: With an extravagant design and a clever roof mechanism allows the French car especially the hearts of fresh air loving women since mid-2003 beat. Less trouble the Citroën designers have invested in the occupant protection: An adequate rollover protection is absent when the Pluriel goes with recessed roof rails over the country. This means that the front and rear passengers exposed to a very high risk of injury for the passengers can be total only rated "poor". To be in the Citroen nevertheless better protected in the event of a rare rollover, you should not do without the detachable roof bars. Source and more info here: http://www.adac.de/infotestrat/tests/crash-test/cabrio_rollover/default.asp x?ComponentId=25850&SourcePageId=31799





Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?




Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1967 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme 442 clone: 9.850 @ 135.000
John Gibreal, Engine: 485 ci Olds, Tires: Hooseir 16x33


1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme : 10.068 @ 132.596
Tyler Bonham, Engine: 406 small chevy, Supercharger: None Turbos: None Tires: 32


1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme 2 Door: 10.073 @ 134.320
Antonio Brintley, Engine: 383 small block chevy, Tires: Hoosier 29.0/10.0


1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme : 10.480 @ 128.100
Jerad, Engine: Chevy 327, Tires: 185/65r15 Front, 275/60r15 Rear


1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme : 10.551 @ 125.930
Rich Panicaro, Engine: 357 chevy, Tires: 29x9x15 rear


1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme : 10.570 @ 128.000
Kam Nevala, Engine: 509 BBC, Tires: 28x9 slicks


1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme : 10.826 @ 123.360
Jason Walker, Engine: 496 Olds, Supercharger: n/a Turbos: n/a Tires: Hoosier 30/9.0-15


1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme : 11.670 @ 115.720
jim barber, Engine: 355 chevy, Tires: mickey thompson drag radial


1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme : 11.677 @ 120.970
Jason Hansen, Engine: 1972 Olds 455, Tires: MT ET Street 28X11.5X15


1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme : 11.700 @ 121.226
Brian, Engine: 455 olds .040,


1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme : 11.720 @ 112.540
Ryan Ortosky, Engine: 3.8 SFI Turbo Buick, Turbos: stock Tires: MT ET Drags


1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme : 11.947 @ 117.570
T.J., Engine: 455, Tires: MICKEY THOMPSON ET STREET


1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme : 12.000 @ 110.584
Dan Durrence, Engine: 355 Olds Rocket, Supercharger: N/A Turbos: N/A Tires: Front=Stock....Rear+Drag Slicks..28.5x9x15


1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme : 12.048 @ 112.560
Dwight, Engine: 455, Supercharger: none Turbos: none Tires: MT Radial


1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme : 12.197 @ 111.390
Dwight Kohout, Engine: 455 Olds, 0 0 Tires: MT radials


1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme : 12.300 @ 106.000
Edwin, Engine: 355, Tires: M/T Drag Radials


1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme : 12.620 @ 110.640
Dwight Kohout, Engine: 455 Olds, Tires: BFG


1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Coupe: 12.930 @ 106.690
Ryan Ortosky, Engine: 350 Olds, Tires: 215/65R15, 275/50R15


1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme 2 DOOR POST CAR: 13.020 @ 99.760
DANNY AMOS, Engine: 1978 403, Tires: REAR 29.1100


1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme brougham: 13.208 @ 102.740
christopher stephenson, Engine: 406, Supercharger: na Turbos: na Tires: hoosire 26/10 15'' drag slicks


 


©2014 DragTimes - Disclaimer