Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

CHALLENGER RT SLP LOUDMOUTH 1

LM1s


 


More Videos...


2011 Dodge Challenger R/T With Dual Cherry Bomb Single Chamber Exhaust and Resonator Delete
2011 Dodge Challenger R/T With Dual Cherry Bomb Single Chamber Exhaust and Resonator Delete - Done by TBC in Fayetteville, NC ...Just ignore how I can't seem to get into my car...the automatic door unlock doesn't seem to wanna work for me lately. lol





2012 Challenger R/T with SLP Loudmouth Cat-Back Exhaust
My 2012 Dodge Challenger 5.7L R/T with SLP Loudmouth Cat-Back Exhaust (the loudest of the Exhaust series). Doing some revving and small burnouts. Enjoy! Other modifications include: - custom green racing stripe and green brake calipers - green halos - tinted windows and tail lights - H&R lowering springs - HID's





Challenger R/T vs 03 Cobra
Stock 09 R/T w/ JBA Exhaust messing around with a friends Pullied 03 Cobra. The challenger does suprisingly well out of the hole, but it's obvious it doesn't make the power it needs.





Challenger R/T Dynatech Long tubes and SLP Loudmouth 1's
Just a quick video showing the sound of the new Exhaust. I didnt buy the catback SLP system. It uses SRT 3inch mids and a 3 inch MBRP with LM1 resonators. The windows are up for the first part and when i turn the corner the windows are down. Mashed the go pedal in first and shifted into second spinning the entire time.





Challenger with SLP LOUDMOUTH 1
Lm1





challenger 2010 slp loudmouth driving around
My bro following behind me. didnt know he videoed so long.





Jay Leno's Challenger SRT8 with a Flowmaster American Thunder Catback Exhaust
I narrate this vid of Jay Leno's Challenger SRT8 muscle car with a 6.1L Hemi.





SLP 2010 Challenger R/T Loud Mouth II Cat-Back Exhaust (#D31030)
2010 Challenger R/T MOPAR '10 - SLP Loud Mouth II Cat-Back Exhaust (#D31030)





2015 Dodge Challenger R/T Scat Pack DETAILED Review and Road Test in 4K
Is the Dodge Challenger right for you? Check out the most detailed review on YouTube to find out. In high-res 4K! More videos: http://goo.gl/Kj1FlI Best cars in 2014: http://goo.gl/3xAVJi Upcoming reviews: http://goo.gl/pLtP6U AOA on Facebook: http://goo.gl/a47Cu1 Designing "retro" always sounds easy to me. You pull out a picture of ye olde Challenger from 1971, put it next to a picture of your largest sedan and make the shapes fit. Tack on some 5MPH inspired bumpers, spray it with lime-green paint and hey-presto, you have a modern Challenger. You also have one enormous coupé. Sure, Chrysler says the "LC" platform Challenger is shorter than their "LX" platform sedans, but you'd be hard pressed to say where inches were excised. The result is a heavyweight muscle car that is nearly a foot longer than a Mustang. Parked next to the Camaro and Mustang, the Challenger dwarfs them both like the Jolly Green Giant next to Little Pea. This means comparisons between the three muscle cars is difficult. It doesn't make rational sense to me either because they're just not the same kind of car. While the Challenger's dimensions are likely to turn off some shoppers, I was strangely intrigued. Thanks to the proportions and long wheelbase, rear accommodations are large, comfortable and "normally" shaped. What do I mean by that? Sit in a Mustang, Camaro, or most other two-door four-seat coupés and you'll notice the seat backs are set at an odd angle to "improve" the headroom and legroom numbers in an otherwise small rear compartment. Despite having (on paper) only three inches more legroom and two more inches of headroom than the Mustang or Camaro, the rear cabin feels cavernous. It's even possible to squeeze a third adult in the rear of the Challenger, something you can't do in the four-seat Camaro or Mustang. What else can you do? Drop three child seats in the back. Rather than trying to be the American 4-Series, the Challenger is more like the American BMW 6-Series or Mercedes CL. The bigger, softer Challenger is a more practical car, a more comfortable car, and with power figures that start at 300HP and go to Lamborghini territory with the 707HP Hellcat, this is a very different beast. Marching to its own drummer the Challenger is an easy win for me. The 485HP 6.4L V8 is also an easy win because you can justify it as being the practical alternative to the 707HP monster. There's just one problem: you can get the same engine in the nearly identically handling Charger SRT...





SLP 2011 Charger RT Loud Mouth Cat-Back Exhaust (#D31040)
2011 Charger RT 5.7L - SLP Loud Mouth Cat-Back Exhaust (#D31040)





Hooter's Girl Drives 500HP Challenger.mpg
http://www.speedysgarage.net Hooter's waitresses drive 500HP twin turbo Challenger.





Challenger R/T SLP Loudmouth 1
Swapped mufflers out. I had MBRP but it wasn't doin it for me so now I'm runnin SLP Loudmouth Resonators on a MBRP 3 inch Exhaust. The Kooks are next.....





Dodge Challenger SRT8 MBRP Exhaust Cat back
Startup , rev, and back up of the Challenger.





SLP LOUDMOUTH Challenger R/T
My R/T with SLP LOUDMOUTH 1 In the canyons. With a little quarter donut lol





Challenger R/T SLP Loudmouth Exhaust
Challenger R/T SLP loudmouth Exhaust installed by us at STC enjoy! See more of this Challenger and other install at our facebook page http:/www.facebook.com/streettrickscustoms





Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?




Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

1973 Dodge Challenger 383 ATI D3M ProCharger: 8.541 @ 158.740
sdconcepts, Engine: 383cid, Supercharger: ATI D3M ProCharger


2008 Dodge Challenger Direct Connection: 9.247 @ 148.830
Brian Falzon, Engine: 440 Gen 3 aluminum Hemi, Turbos: 88mm Turbonetics Tires: Hoosier 9x30


1970 Dodge Challenger SE: 9.610 @ 137.890
MoparChas, Engine: 495 CID, Tires: Hoosier


1973 Dodge Challenger : 9.620 @ 139.000
patrick et Roxanne, Engine: 440, Tires: 33-14.5


1971 Dodge Challenger : 9.720 @ 138.320
Mario C., Engine: 508 p.c (n/a), Supercharger: nd Turbos: nd Tires: 30.0 in


1971 Dodge Challenger : 9.950 @ 136.000
Melvin McDonald, Engine: 499, Tires: M/T 265/75 Drag radial


1971 Dodge Challenger : 10.400 @ 126.500
don rauch, Engine: 410 stroked, Tires: hoosiers


2010 Dodge Challenger R/T: 10.861 @ 124.960
Jon Dalton, Engine: 5.7 (345 CID) naturally aspirated, Tires: 28x10.5-15 M/T slicks


1970 Dodge Challenger : 10.904 @ 121.000
Bob Utes, Engine: 440 .040 @10.2:1, Supercharger: no Turbos: no Tires: BFGs f ront - MT drag radials rear


2009 Dodge Challenger RT 6 Speed: 10.990 @ 126.890
Speedy, Engine: Arrington forged 6.0L, Supercharger: Magnuson


1970 Dodge Challenger : 11.214 @ 118.940
Bob Utes, Engine: 440+.040 @ 10:1, Tires: BFGs front - M/T radial rear


1970 Dodge Challenger RT: 11.287 @ 120.371
Barry Conner, Engine: 346 inch small block, Tires: Good Year


2009 Dodge Challenger RT: 11.430 @ 116.000
Phil Williams, Engine: 5.7 Hemi stock block, Supercharger: magnacharger


2009 Dodge Challenger rt: 11.621 @ 115.810
Phil Williams, Engine: 5.7, Supercharger: magnacharger


2009 Dodge Challenger R/T: 11.687 @ 116.850
John Blateri, Engine: 5.7 L, Tires: Nitto NT05R 275/40/17


1970 Dodge Challenger RT: 11.780 @ 115.940
Dan Newbold, Engine: 346 inch small block, Tires: Good Year


1970 Dodge Challenger RT: 11.790 @ 115.620
Dan Newbold, Engine: 346 in Mopar small block, Tires: Hoover frt & rear


2009 Dodge Challenger RT: 11.795 @ 121.890
Speedy, Engine: Arrington 6.0L Stroker, Supercharger: Magnuson Tires: M&H 275/50-17


1970 Dodge Challenger R/T: 11.857 @ 113.680
Jack Parris, Engine: 426 Hemi, Tires: M/T ET Streets


2010 Dodge Challenger SE: 11.925 @ 114.270
Joe Bowman, Engine: 3.5 V6, Supercharger: Powerdyne


 


©2015 DragTimes - Disclaimer - Contact Us