The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's Front and Side Impact crash tests for the Chevrolet Aveo, presented by Consumer Reports
The Chevrolet Aveo received the following ratings in the IIHS's crash tests:
Frontal Offset: Acceptable
Side Impact (With Airbags): Marginal
2009 Chevy Malibu vs 1959 Bel Air Crash Test
This crash test between a modern sedan and the classic 1959 Chevrolet Bel
Air shows just how far passenger protection has come in the last fifty
years. The Institute for Highway Safety staged the test to commemorate its
50th anniversary. Find more crash tests on our web site:
Low Speed Crash Test 2010 Chevrolet Aveo
¡Mejora tu taller!
Visita la 11a Expo Reparación Automotriz 2013
WTC Cd. de México 14-15 de marzo
Pruebas de impacto no destructivas al Chevrolet Aveo 2010. Impacto trasero:
15.43 y 15.77 para el delantero. Ensayos según las normas del RCAR,
Research Council for Automobile Repair.
Toluca, México, 30/03/2010
TOP 10 WORST CRASH TESTS
UPDATED VERSION: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRyAB1aC0bw
Thanks For Watching! Make Sure You Leave A Like!
And Make Sure You Subscribe To Me And Others!
Mr Geoclay :
Hi!, It's Regan :
exL Aquas :
Make Sure You Like My friends Facebook Page:
2012 Chevrolet Aveo CRASH TEST
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy
readings indicated good protection for the knees and femurs of both the
driver and front passenger dummies and Chevrolet showed that a similar
level of protection would be offered to occupants of different sizes and to
those sat in different seating positions. The Aveo scored maximum points in
the side barrier test, all body regions being well protected. Even in the
more severe pole test, the chest was adequately protected. The seat and
head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the
event of a rear-end collision.
Maximum points were scored in the dynamic tests for the protection of the 3
year infant. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward
facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear
information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag
and the system was rewarded by Euro NCAP. Permanently attached labels also
provide clear warnings that the passenger airbag should be disabled before
a rearward facing child seat can be used in that position.
Euro NCAP | Chevrolet Aveo | 2006 | Crash test
http://www.euroncap.com/tests/chevrolet_aveo_2006/250.aspx Frontal Impact
takes place at 64 Km/h, 40% of the width of the car striking a deformable
barrier. In the side impact, a mobile deformable barrier impacts the
driver's door at 50 km/h. In the pole test, the car tested is propelled
sideways at 29km/h into a rigid pole.
Crash Test 2012 - Chevrolet Sonic / Aveo (Frontal Offset) IIHS
2012 models 2012 Chevrolet Sonic: good performance in front, side,
rollover, and rear tests and standard electronic stability control
FRONTAL OFFSET TEST
OVERALL EVALUATION: Structure/safety cage Injury measures Restraints/dummy
Head/neck Chest Leg/foot, left Leg/foot, right
Important: Frontal crash test ratings can be compared only among vehicles
of similar weight.
Good Acceptable Marginal Poor
The Chevrolet Sonic was introduced in the 2012 model year as a replacement
for the Chevrolet Aveo.
Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement was well controlled. The
driver side curtain airbag deployed during the crash. After the dummy moved
forward into the frontal airbag, its head contacted the side curtain
Injury measures — Measures taken from the neck, chest, and both legs
indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this
severity. A high head acceleration occurred when the dummy's head hit the
steering wheel through the airbag, indicating that head injuries would be
Ford F150 and Honda Civic frontal crash test by IIHS
When large, truck-based SUVs collide with passenger cars or minivans, the
results can be devastating for the occupants of the latter.
But fatalities in such accidents are on the decrease in the United States
thanks to measures employed by automakers. Traffic deaths are down 64
percent since the year 2000 due to changes in automobile design such as
lower bumpers for SUVs and better-protect cabin cells for passenger cars.
In 2000, the death rate for car and minivan passengers in collisions with
trucks or SUVs was 44 deaths per million. That came down to 16 deaths per
million by 2009.
The study was conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, a
private-sector group based in Arlington, Virginia.
"By working together, the automakers got life-saving changes done quickly,"
said Joe Nolan, the institute's chief administrative officer.
Test Chevrolet Aveo 1.6L: El secreto esta en el promedio
Lee el test completo ►http://goo.gl/Ac2KcE
Síntesis: Llega para ocupar el escalón superior del segmento B de los
nuevos exponentes de los tricuerpos, sobre el Chevrolet Corsa II y a
pasitos del, ¿Abandonado?, Astra. Tomando sus definiciones de a una
(motor, precio, equipamiento, calidad) no impresiona; pero cuando revisamos
el promedio final la ecuación cambia. Un auténtico bajo perfil que cuando
se lo conoce en profundidad puede volcar la balanza. Llega desde México y
se diseñó, para Europa, en Corea.
Podes seguirnos a través de nuestras redes sociales:
Low Speed Crash Test MAZDA 3 2010
Video que muestra el comportamiento del Mazda 3 en choques a baja
velocidad. Cesvi México estudia la reparabilidad del vehículo así como
el costo y disponibilidad de refacciones.